Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

914World.com _ 914World Garage _ 'Cooling flaps' in top of engine tin

Posted by: johnnie5 Feb 6 2009, 01:38 PM

Just as the title states....
When I was dressing my new motor I noticed these 'reverse' flaps. But have no idea what cable would hook up to the flapper arm, or where it would come from? Or what would activate it?
Someone please enlighten me...

Posted by: type47 Feb 6 2009, 02:28 PM

the flaps are "cooling" flaps that divert air over the cylinder heads for .... well..... cooling. biggrin.gif the flaps are spring "loaded" such that if the arrangement fails, then the flaps are in a default cooling mode for safety sake. the flaps are operated by a cable that runs vertically upward beside the engine up through a small hole in the tin. there is a place for a screw and nut to clamp the cable on the rod (the spring loaded rod that the flaps are attached to). the cable is attached to a bellows like piece located under the engine that is the thermostat. when the thermostat gets warm, the bellows expands and the cable is .... relaxed (?).... and the flaps move to the warm engine cooling position. when the thermostat gets cold, it contracts and pulls the cable to open the cooling flaps to the cold engine position.

where is Dave Darling when you need something explained? rolleyes.gif laugh.gif

Posted by: johnnie5 Feb 6 2009, 02:41 PM

Ok, so its thermostat activated - that makes sense. Where is the stat? Does anyone have a pic?

Posted by: blitZ Feb 6 2009, 02:46 PM

QUOTE(johnnie5 @ Feb 6 2009, 03:41 PM) *

Ok, so its thermostat activated - that makes sense. Where is the stat? Does anyone have a pic?


The bellows thermostat is on the drivers side bottom of the engine sump. It's not uncommon for them to be missing and the flaps secured in the cooling position.

Posted by: ericread Feb 6 2009, 02:52 PM

Here's some classic pictures:

This picture has the cooling flaps closed - for cold weather.
Attached Image

This picture shows the cooling flaps open - engine warm condition.
Attached Image

This is a picture of the thermostat, which fits near your alternator. It expands and contracts per the temperature. The attaching wire moves with the expansion and contraction, which opens and closes the flaps.
Attached Image

Eric

Posted by: SirAndy Feb 6 2009, 03:09 PM

QUOTE(ericread @ Feb 6 2009, 12:52 PM) *

This is a picture of the thermostat, which fits near your alternator.


Just FYI, the bolt for the thermostat bracket is a *through* bolt!

If removed from the case and not plugged, you will have a nice big oil leak ...
shades.gif Andy

Posted by: maf914 Feb 6 2009, 03:27 PM

A key feature of the spring loaded cooling flaps is that when the thermostat heats up the bellows expands and relaxes the cable which is connected to the flaps. The engine is now warm and it allows the flaps to go to their default position. This position directs the maximum amount of air through the oil cooler for maximum engine cooling.

Should the cable break or not be installed the spring loaded flaps will go to this position. In warm climate areas some people leave off the thermostat and cable and run the flaps in the default position for max cooling.

When the cable is drawn tight by the cold thermostat it pulls the spring loaded flaps into a position that allows most of the air to bypass the oil cooler and travel primarily to the cylinders. If the flaps are not present the result will be similar, limited flow through the oil cooler.

Posted by: johnnie5 Feb 6 2009, 03:49 PM

Thanks everyone, for the fine explanations and pics! I now have a good understanding of how the flaps work. Being that I live in San Diego, it seems that I will be fine with not re-installing the cable from the stat and just leaving the flaps in the default position.

Posted by: ericread Feb 6 2009, 05:37 PM

QUOTE(johnnie5 @ Feb 6 2009, 01:49 PM) *

Thanks everyone, for the fine explanations and pics! I now have a good understanding of how the flaps work. Being that I live in San Diego, it seems that I will be fine with not re-installing the cable from the stat and just leaving the flaps in the default position.


agree.gif

I have the flaps but no thermostat and I have no heating issues whatsoever. Don't you just love living in South Cali???

shades.gif

Posted by: Joe Ricard Feb 6 2009, 05:47 PM

The thermostat controls the warming up of the engine.
As in the engine will come up to temp lots quicker. which is what you want , so the cylinder and piston will have less blow by. Happens when things are cold.

THAT IS WHAT THE THERMOSTAT DOES.

Posted by: Keoni914 Aug 31 2009, 08:52 PM

Interesting information for us newbies! Thanks

One question please, does one need to move the position of the connection point for the wire, completely forward on the flap connection thingie. I didn't know the flaps are positioned in the default cooling position.

Does it make sense to connect the wire while the flaps are closed? (ie tension on the thermostat wire.)

Thanks

What a great forum!!

Keoni914

Posted by: rjames Aug 31 2009, 09:01 PM

My cable is fraying from where it is rubbing on the engine tin. I'm guessing that there is supposed to be some kind of sleeve to keep this from happening?

And are new cables available, or can I just use a modified brake cable from a bike or something?

Posted by: type47 Aug 31 2009, 10:02 PM

QUOTE(Keoni914 @ Aug 31 2009, 06:52 PM) *

One question please, does one need to move the position of the connection point for the wire, completely forward on the flap connection thingie. I didn't know the flaps are positioned in the default cooling position.

Does it make sense to connect the wire while the flaps are closed? (ie tension on the thermostat wire.)


The flaps are to be connected so that they are "under tension", that is, the cable is tightened under the holding nut so the shaft is pushed against the spring. You could use a third hand in tightening the nut on the cable. As the engine warms and blows warm then hot air onto the thermostat, it expands and the spring tension on the rod that the flaps are mounted to, moves to the correct position for cooling.

I've read where someone used a bike brake or gear cable for the thermostat cable. In the factory installation, there is a small grommet (basically a rubber disk with a hole) where the cable goes through the tin.

Posted by: StratPlayer Sep 1 2009, 11:42 AM

Pic of thermostat and pulley cable sits in. You can get new cables from AA.

Posted by: StratPlayer Sep 1 2009, 11:45 AM

gdss


Attached image(s)
Attached Image

Posted by: mtndawg Sep 1 2009, 12:45 PM

This is where it goes through the tin. You can also see the rubber grommet.Attached Image

Posted by: Vacca Rabite Sep 1 2009, 12:51 PM

Keep in mind - while the flaps are supposed to fail open (cooling state) they don't always. Mine failed closed (warming state).

While I fixed that problem (more pressure on the spring, and grease in the plastic bushings) I also decided to remove the T-stat and jsut always have the flaps open.

Its a summer toy, so I consider this a really minor sin.

Zach

Posted by: RiqueMar Oct 11 2009, 12:21 AM

QUOTE(Vacca Rabite @ Sep 1 2009, 11:51 AM) *

Keep in mind - while the flaps are supposed to fail open (cooling state) they don't always. Mine failed closed (warming state).

While I fixed that problem (more pressure on the spring, and grease in the plastic bushings) I also decided to remove the T-stat and jsut always have the flaps open.

Its a summer toy, so I consider this a really minor sin.

Zach

Sorry to re-activate a possibly dead thread, btu being in San Diego and building my 2.0L for a daily driver, would I benefit from having the flaps always open?

Posted by: 7275914911 Oct 11 2009, 07:25 AM

not meaning to hijacked.gif but

If you run them OPEN what would the consequences be of not running them at all??

stirthepot.gif Inquiring minds want to know??

KP

Posted by: Jacob Oct 11 2009, 09:14 AM

Are these thermostats still available?

Posted by: tat2dphreak Oct 11 2009, 09:33 AM

QUOTE
If you run them OPEN what would the consequences be of not running them at all??

the air will not be directed properly, but you can modify and put in other pieces of tin to make them work, but you have to fab this. they not only act as an open/shutoff, they act as an air re-director. my new engine had new air pieces fabbed to re-direct the air without using the flaps.

QUOTE
Are these thermostats still available?

no, but I have heard of people using a similar one, that opens sooner

QUOTE

Its a summer toy, so I consider this a really minor sin.

agree.gif I'm in Tx it's summer from April to October usually. and if it's "cold" I won't drive it except a relatively few days that it's warm enough to run a little heat. the flaps failing in warming condition is not that unheard of.

Posted by: McMark Oct 11 2009, 10:55 AM

QUOTE
If you run them OPEN what would the consequences be of not running them at all??

Don't do it. You will not get any airflow through your oil cooler.

Posted by: SirAndy Oct 11 2009, 12:29 PM

QUOTE(McMark @ Oct 11 2009, 08:55 AM) *

QUOTE
If you run them OPEN what would the consequences be of not running them at all??

Don't do it. You will not get any airflow through your oil cooler.

agree.gif

Running "open" is the wrong terminology anyways.
The passenger side flap is actually down to direct full air flow to the oil cooler.

If you remove the flaps, you won't get any air over your oil cooler.
popcorn[1].gif Andy

Posted by: RiqueMar Oct 11 2009, 01:00 PM

QUOTE(SirAndy @ Oct 11 2009, 11:29 AM) *

QUOTE(McMark @ Oct 11 2009, 08:55 AM) *

QUOTE
If you run them OPEN what would the consequences be of not running them at all??

Don't do it. You will not get any airflow through your oil cooler.

agree.gif

Running "open" is the wrong terminology anyways.
The passenger side flap is actually down to direct full air flow to the oil cooler.

If you remove the flaps, you won't get any air over your oil cooler.
popcorn[1].gif Andy


What about keeping the flaps in, but always in cooling mode?

I understand the direction of airflow over the oil cooler, but what about always having them in cooling mode? idea.gif

Posted by: 7275914911 Oct 11 2009, 01:10 PM

QUOTE(McMark @ Oct 11 2009, 11:55 AM) *

QUOTE
If you run them OPEN what would the consequences be of not running them at all??

Don't do it. You will not get any airflow through your oil cooler.


Thx....

KP

Posted by: SirAndy Oct 11 2009, 01:12 PM

QUOTE(RiqueMar @ Oct 11 2009, 11:00 AM) *

What about keeping the flaps in, but always in cooling mode?
I understand the direction of airflow over the oil cooler, but what about always having them in cooling mode? idea.gif

I ran my 2056 like that. No thermostat, flaps always in full cooling mode.

Worked fine here in CA even through the "winter".
stirthepot.gif Andy

Posted by: tat2dphreak Oct 11 2009, 01:23 PM

QUOTE
I ran my 2056 like that. No thermostat, flaps always in full cooling mode.

agree.gif wes just took the next step and removed them and fabricated new pieces to guide the air correctly, but leaving them in "full cooling" is essentially the same.

Posted by: RiqueMar Oct 11 2009, 02:32 PM

QUOTE(tat2dphreak @ Oct 11 2009, 12:23 PM) *

QUOTE
I ran my 2056 like that. No thermostat, flaps always in full cooling mode.

agree.gif wes just took the next step and removed them and fabricated new pieces to guide the air correctly, but leaving them in "full cooling" is essentially the same.


See, I'm considering this, because SoCal has no real 'winter'.

Posted by: RiqueMar Oct 11 2009, 11:38 PM

As I said, I was considering this, so here's some visuals that I snapped today...


The first picture is of the flaps in the 'warm up' position......

IPB Image



THe second, is the flaps in the 'cooling' position....

IPB Image

Posted by: SirAndy Oct 12 2009, 12:17 AM

QUOTE(RiqueMar @ Oct 11 2009, 09:38 PM) *

The second, is the flaps in the 'cooling' position...

thumb3d.gif


Notice how the drivers side flap is all open to let air flow over the cylinders while the passenger side flap is down to give full air flow to the oil cooler.

If you simply removed the flaps, your oil cooler would not get any air ...
shades.gif Andy

Posted by: ME733 Oct 12 2009, 12:18 PM

popcorn[1].gif ..well ..NOT having any air flaps. Diverters at all.....will not effect air going over the oil cooler....the air is pressurized..and as such WILL equalize in the sheetmetal back to front and go over the cylinders and oil cooler and out. I have never had ANY repeat ANY oil cooling problems , by removing ALL the crap that is in the way, of restricting air flow to the cylinders..(.THE DAMN FLAPS.) The engine , cools ,revs better as the compacted air has less restriction, and or cavation.(compacting air to the point that air flow virtually ceases) . When your cast aluminum fan blows up (as some one in a recient post had )...it is due from the force , restriction, cavation, to such a degree that the AIR PRESSURE will break aluminum fins off the air impeller/blower. This is why the racers who turn ..LOTS of rpm,s remove fan blades. To prevent cavation. to keep air flow going at extreme rpm,s. Porsche race cars solved the problem by having air blowers/ fans, with FEWER blades... all that force , of air inside the air housings, against the fan blades ALSO COSTS HORSEPOWER, Now with all this said I do not build engines for people that sit in traffic, for hours, and turn only 3500 rpms. with 10-w-30-oil., ,.I.M.E. no flaps - no problem. However; If there are those owners of 914s who want their cars to be totally stock as relates to air diverters, flappers and are concerned that modofications MAY affect the cooling of their engine then please disreguard ALL the information in this post. By all means do it your way.It,s your money, and time. popcorn[1].gif

Posted by: SirAndy Oct 12 2009, 12:47 PM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 12 2009, 10:18 AM) *

popcorn[1].gif ..well ..NOT having any air flaps. Diverters at all.....will not effect air going over the oil cooler....the air is pressurized..and as such WILL equalize in the sheetmetal back to front and go over the cylinders and oil cooler and out.


Least resistance...
The path over the cylinders and out the bottom is much less restrictive than the path through the small cavities in the oil cooler.
I doubt you get any decent air flow through the oil cooler that way. It might work on your race car for short run sessions, but it won't work for a daily driver.

Heck, i know of one AX 914 that does not run any cooling at all, no tin, no fan, no shroud, nada.
It still does have the stock oil cooler with a 12V computer housing fan providing "air flow".
Works great on 60 second runs.
shades.gif Andy

Posted by: McMark Oct 12 2009, 01:04 PM

QUOTE
I do not build engines for people that sit in traffic, for hours, and turn only 3500 rpms. with 10-w-30-oil., ,.I.M.E. no flaps - no problem.

WHAT!? Since most of the cars here are daily driver types, and not EXCLUSIVE autocross types, PLEASE don't promote racer modifications as daily driver modifications. You said you don't have experience with daily driver cars, so don't make blanket recommendations for daily drivers. mad.gif

I recently installed the cooling flaps in a motor that the builder had left them out of and got an 80 degree drop in the oil temp. It went from baking the oil to running perfectly cool with no other changes than installing the flaps.

Posted by: ME733 Oct 12 2009, 01:44 PM

QUOTE(McMark @ Oct 12 2009, 03:04 PM) *

QUOTE
I do not build engines for people that sit in traffic, for hours, and turn only 3500 rpms. with 10-w-30-oil., ,.I.M.E. no flaps - no problem.

WHAT!? Since most of the cars here are daily driver types, and not EXCLUSIVE autocross types, PLEASE don't promote racer modifications as daily driver modifications. You said you don't have experience with daily driver cars, so don't make blanket recommendations for daily drivers. mad.gif

I recently installed the cooling flaps in a motor that the builder had left them out of and got an 80 degree drop in the oil temp. It went from baking the oil to running perfectly cool with no other changes than installing the flaps.

Which "motor" are you talking about?, the fan blower, heater motor?...the fuel pump "motor"?..etc. I am talking about the ENGINE .you have so much experience you don"t know the difference. Allow me to help. MOTORS are electrical things. ENGINES are internal combustion things. the 914,s I,ve built have to warn up...even on hot days, due to the oil not getting up to temperature very fast., and run cool. and are/were driven.(to the track and back)... also I qualified my response to this post....so who annoited you as the "RESPONSE POLICE". and your angry?...well shit I just hate that.

Posted by: RiqueMar Oct 12 2009, 02:43 PM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 12 2009, 12:44 PM) *

QUOTE(McMark @ Oct 12 2009, 03:04 PM) *

QUOTE
I do not build engines for people that sit in traffic, for hours, and turn only 3500 rpms. with 10-w-30-oil., ,.I.M.E. no flaps - no problem.

WHAT!? Since most of the cars here are daily driver types, and not EXCLUSIVE autocross types, PLEASE don't promote racer modifications as daily driver modifications. You said you don't have experience with daily driver cars, so don't make blanket recommendations for daily drivers. mad.gif

I recently installed the cooling flaps in a motor that the builder had left them out of and got an 80 degree drop in the oil temp. It went from baking the oil to running perfectly cool with no other changes than installing the flaps.

Which "motor" are you talking about?, the fan blower, heater motor?...the fuel pump "motor"?..etc. I am talking about the ENGINE .you have so much experience you don"t know the difference. Allow me to help. MOTORS are electrical things. ENGINES are internal combustion things. the 914,s I,ve built have to warn up...even on hot days, due to the oil not getting up to temperature very fast., and run cool. and are/were driven.(to the track and back)... also I qualified my response to this post....so who annoited you as the "RESPONSE POLICE". and your angry?...well shit I just hate that.



Chill, the only reason McMark and SirAndy are defensive of their response was because your first post seemed aggressive.

There's no need to specify motor or engine, we all know what the other is talking about. And regardless, a motor is anything that produces and imparts motion, so motor is correct.

Posted by: SirAndy Oct 12 2009, 03:22 PM

Motor - A machine that converts other forms of energy into mechanical energy and so imparts motion

In ROW, there's no distinction between "Motor" and "Engine". A fuel pump motor would simply be a "Electrical Motor" while a car engine would be a "Internal Combustion Motor".

In any case, this is a moot point and semantics are not relevant to the discussion.
shades.gif Andy

Posted by: McMark Oct 12 2009, 04:35 PM

barf.gif
Oh man. Talking about keeping motors ALIVE turned into an english lesson.

Bottom line, ME733, your advice will cause people with daily drivers to lose motors. Whoops, engines. rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Dave_Darling Oct 12 2009, 04:57 PM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 12 2009, 11:18 AM) *
... I have never had ANY repeat ANY oil cooling problems , by removing ALL the crap that is in the way, of restricting air flow to the cylinders..(.THE DAMN FLAPS.)
...
Now with all this said I do not build engines for people that sit in traffic, for hours, and turn only 3500 rpms. with 10-w-30-oil., ,.I.M.E. no flaps - no problem.


Your post illustrates two things quite well.

First, that a race car is not a street car, and that most race car mods make for really crappy street cars.

Second, that the "no flaps needed" myth is really pervasive, and that we still need to be on guard against those who try to spread it. And it truly is a myth--street 914s do in fact need them. I've seen at least one motor cooked from leaving them out, and two more that were caught before permanent damage was done. (Yoder couldn't understand why his oil temps were so high. Once he installed them, the temps came down.)

--DD

Posted by: ME733 Oct 13 2009, 12:32 PM

QUOTE(Dave_Darling @ Oct 12 2009, 06:57 PM) *

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 12 2009, 11:18 AM) *
... I have never had ANY repeat ANY oil cooling problems , by removing ALL the crap that is in the way, of restricting air flow to the cylinders..(.THE DAMN FLAPS.)
...
Now with all this said I do not build engines for people that sit in traffic, for hours, and turn only 3500 rpms. with 10-w-30-oil., ,.I.M.E. no flaps - no problem.


Your post illustrates two things quite well.

First, that a race car is not a street car, and that most race car mods make for really crappy street cars.

Second, that the "no flaps needed" myth is really pervasive, and that we still need to be on guard against those who try to spread it. And it truly is a myth--street 914s do in fact need them. I've seen at least one motor cooked from leaving them out, and two more that were caught before permanent damage was done. (Yoder couldn't understand why his oil temps were so high. Once he installed them, the temps came down.)


popcorn[1].gif Well Dave, for you to say the ..No flaps needed " MYTH is pervasive and you need to be on guard"etc. is just ignorant arrognance.. I have built plenty of street cars without the "damn flaps". and every one of them ran cool.( every one of them was non stock). it,s not a myth its a FACT. What you and other people have experienced is other problems with the engine that you failed to recognize.(and probably won,t admit ).examples: ignition timing too low or high., fuel grade too low, lean fuel delivery(jets or injectors), clogged oil cooler, and missing SIDE TIN/sheetmetal( which IS imperative to retain,)... improper valve lash,manafold air leaks, and many other things. A FAILED flapper cable connection, bellows , or jambing of these items or the 'flappers', will fry the engine also.The "flappers and air ductwork were designed to accomodate the entire spectrum of weather conditions ,. Including very cold weather. So the 914 would operate normally in ALL weather conditions. with about 72-to 100 horsepower. With any modification which increases H.P.over stock ... ,2.o injectors on a 1.7 or carb conversions, cams , headwork, etc that increases H.P. and btu,s of heat you should rethink what cools the engine, and how it can be done more effectively . HAVE you heard about the alternative fan housings and impellers which have been around for at least 15 years?. maybe the 911 engine?, no bellows no cable ,no flappers no problem. Just air pressure passing thru the oil cooler fins. So If YOU want to use the "damn flappers" and associated crap please continue to do so.
popcorn[1].gif

Posted by: rhodyguy Oct 13 2009, 12:41 PM

if i put an oil cooler in one of the wheelwells do i still need to install all the crap?

Posted by: ME733 Oct 13 2009, 12:56 PM

QUOTE(rhodyguy @ Oct 13 2009, 02:41 PM) *

if i put an oil cooler in one of the wheelwells do i still need to install all the crap?

popcorn[1].gif keep the stock oil cooler, use the "samwichplate" rerouter between the case and oil filter. Then you will have two oil coolers. I.M.E. the "damn flappers" are just piece of crap to eliminate so they won,t cause you problems later.

Posted by: SirAndy Oct 13 2009, 01:34 PM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 13 2009, 10:32 AM) *

I have built plenty of street cars without the "damn flaps".

So you are the one!

I knew we would find you one day ...
biggrin.gif Andy

Posted by: ericread Oct 13 2009, 01:42 PM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 12 2009, 11:18 AM) *

..well ..NOT having any air flaps. Diverters at all.....will not effect air going over the oil cooler....the air is pressurized..and as such WILL equalize in the sheetmetal back to front and go over the cylinders and oil cooler and out.


My $.02.

The above statement is not correct. Air is STUPID.

Unlike water, which will pressurize and equally flow, air will just keep pounding and build back pressure.

In designing under-floor cooling systems for computer data centers, we demonstrated time and time again that a high powered air flow pointing to the floor will not push air equally throughout the room. It will continue to pound until you provide air guides that properly direct the air. The flaps in the 914 engine provide the air guides necessary to properly direct the air flow. If you remove these, you need to create a new set of air-guides.

Eric Read

Posted by: McMark Oct 13 2009, 01:52 PM

QUOTE
What you and other people have experienced is other problems with the engine that you failed to recognize.

So please explain to me how the same motor on the same day on the same road runs SIGNIFICATLY cooler simply by installing those flaps. It was a one day, in-n-out job and that was the ONLY change made to the setup.

Posted by: tat2dphreak Oct 13 2009, 09:14 PM

QUOTE
If you remove these, you need to create a new set of air-guides.

agree.gif damn physics fucking up everyone's plans again...

think of it like a pickup truck(if anyone else saw the mythbusters you'll know what I mean)

the air flows out of the frond shroud in motion, but without direction, it will continue on it's path... so cyl 3 would get a little more pressure, but the air above the oil cooler will stay as "a unit of air" with the motion above it creating a cyclone effect that holds a unit of air above the oil cooler, but not pushing it through... engineers use this ability to "carry air" as a unit in the back of a pickup. which acts as part of the aerodynamics even. picture the bed of a truck right ABOVE the oil cooler.... it won't allow air to pass down properly. sure some "seeps" down but the stock flaps actually SPLITS the flow to get the air going in 2 directions. into the oil cooler and above, to the cylinders. the other side acts as an on-off switch basically.

Wes fabbed a piece that does the same thing... it directs air traffic to the oil cooler and to the cylinders breaking up the unit of air.

does that mean every engine without flaps will fail? no... but they may not last quite as long... may still last a long time, though.

think about it this way. the engineers accounted for the thickness of every washer the clearance of every piece... do you think they got to the cooling system of the engine and said "fuck it, lets put little flappy things here, that will be cool, right?" no... that was thought of to, and they wouldn't have put them there if they didn't need SOMETHING... the t-stat is probably more important in cooler climates, but the flaps are important in all climates.

Posted by: ericread Oct 13 2009, 09:27 PM

QUOTE(tat2dphreak @ Oct 13 2009, 08:14 PM) *

QUOTE
If you remove these, you need to create a new set of air-guides.

agree.gif damn physics fucking up everyone's plans again...

think of it like a pickup truck(if anyone else saw the mythbusters you'll know what I mean)

the air flows out of the frond shroud in motion, but without direction, it will continue on it's path... so cyl 3 would get a little more pressure, but the air above the oil cooler will stay as "a unit of air" with the motion above it creating a cyclone effect that holds a unit of air above the oil cooler, but not pushing it through... engineers use this ability to "carry air" as a unit in the back of a pickup. which acts as part of the aerodynamics even. picture the bed of a truck right ABOVE the oil cooler.... it won't allow air to pass down properly. sure some "seeps" down but the stock flaps actually SPLITS the flow to get the air going in 2 directions. into the oil cooler and above, to the cylinders. the other side acts as an on-off switch basically.



agree.gif

Very well said!

Eric

Posted by: Dave_Darling Oct 14 2009, 09:47 AM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 13 2009, 11:32 AM) *
...Well Dave, for you to say the ..No flaps needed " MYTH is pervasive and you need to be on guard"etc. is just ignorant arrognance..


Thank you very much, Mr. Kettle!


I have seen several instances where adding the flaps in (even ones just wired to the full open position) dropped oil temps dramatically. None were the same-day deal that McMark mentions above, but most were checked in similar conditions before and after. In at least one case, the owner fiddled with the timing and the mixture and tried to get more air-flow into the engine bay, and it still ran hot until he re-installed the "damn flaps". I know of many more cases where re-installing them made a difference.

You can keep building flap-less motors. Evidently you know the Super Special Secret that keeps them from running hot. But for all the rest of us, it is critical to keep them--in particular, the flap over the oil cooler.

--DD

Posted by: ME733 Oct 16 2009, 02:07 PM

popcorn[1].gif ...WELL I am exasperated at the lack of creative thought on this subject matter by a few of you guys that are stuck in the monkey see monkey do philosophy of engine building. with your philosophy, and attitude, NOTHING, on the 914 should be altered or improved, as it cannot possably work better, run better, cooler, or with more H.P. ..So , hopefully as my final input to this post I Will continue to build.em my way and you build,em your way. staying as you are in the dark ages of technology. the end. lol-2.gif popcorn[1].gif

Posted by: tat2dphreak Oct 16 2009, 02:15 PM

ok... live and let live I guess... I fail to see how just taking a part and throwing it away is "creative thought", but if it works for you, man... more power to you. beerchug.gif

Posted by: ericread Oct 16 2009, 02:30 PM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 16 2009, 01:07 PM) *

popcorn[1].gif ...WELL I am exasperated at the lack of creative thought on this subject matter by a few of you guys that are stuck in the monkey see monkey do philosophy of engine building. with your philosophy, and attitude, NOTHING, on the 914 should be altered or improved, as it cannot possably work better, run better, cooler, or with more H.P. ..So , hopefully as my final input to this post I Will continue to build.em my way and you build,em your way. staying as you are in the dark ages of technology. the end. lol-2.gif popcorn[1].gif


Actually, it has been mentioned here several times that it would be acceptable to remove the flaps if you replaced them with a suitable air flow mechanism.

Do you have a replacement part or system that you advise using, or do you feel that air flow to the cylinders just isn't that importnat?

Either way I'd like to see your response.

Eric Read


Posted by: Cupomeat Oct 16 2009, 02:45 PM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 16 2009, 04:07 PM) *

popcorn[1].gif ...WELL I am exasperated at the lack of creative thought on this subject matter by a few of you guys that are stuck in the monkey see monkey do philosophy of engine building. with your philosophy, and attitude, NOTHING, on the 914 should be altered or improved, as it cannot possably work better, run better, cooler, or with more H.P. ..So , hopefully as my final input to this post I Will continue to build.em my way and you build,em your way. staying as you are in the dark ages of technology. the end. lol-2.gif popcorn[1].gif


Generally, when dealing with something that was engineered, each piece has a purpose and unless you either determine that you no longer need the purpose (like removing the spray shields from the back of the brakes as you never drive in the rain) you, in an engineering manner, should either retain the item, or develope something to replace it.

This is especially true for WELL designed cars, as many parts on cheaper cars can be improved with a better piece. That being said, the T4 was a very robust aircooled motor for its time and it produced a reasonable amount of power/litre for its time. As we have "improved" the engines we have traded out pieces and improved pieces, but it is VERY rare when we are able to eliminate a piece all together (from the engine, except for things like a heater).

I am just trying to make sure that those who are less engineering inclined think they can just start eliminating parts without consequence.

Posted by: SirAndy Oct 16 2009, 02:53 PM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 16 2009, 12:07 PM) *

... I am ... creative ... you guys .. are ... monkey ...

yellowsleep[1].gif

Posted by: johnnie5 Oct 16 2009, 03:52 PM

QUOTE(ME733 @ Oct 16 2009, 01:07 PM) *

popcorn[1].gif ...WELL I am exasperated at the lack of creative thought on this subject matter by a few of you guys that are stuck in the monkey see monkey do philosophy of engine building. with your philosophy, and attitude, NOTHING, on the 914 should be altered or improved, as it cannot possably work better, run better, cooler, or with more H.P. ..So , hopefully as my final input to this post I Will continue to build.em my way and you build,em your way. staying as you are in the dark ages of technology. the end. lol-2.gif popcorn[1].gif

smoke.gif

Does anybody know if I can buy a new bellows t stat for a bus (and if that will work) so as to get my 'obsolete' warming/cooling flaps functioning properly again?

Or does anyone have a good used 914 one?

Posted by: RiqueMar Oct 16 2009, 04:39 PM

QUOTE(johnnie5 @ Oct 16 2009, 02:52 PM) *
smoke.gif

Does anybody know if I can buy a new bellows t stat for a bus (and if that will work) so as to get my 'obsolete' warming/cooling flaps functioning properly again?

Or does anyone have a good used 914 one?

Johnnie, the flaps that you see in the picture that I posted on page 2 came from a 1.8 that I still have in the back of a truck. I can see if the Bellows mech is still there for you and I'm in Oceanside, PM me if so and I can check, but being in SD,
I've set mine to the default cooling position and I'm sure that will be fine.

Posted by: johnnie5 Oct 16 2009, 05:06 PM

RiqueMar, I have been running the flaps on my 2056 in the cooling position for almost the last year as well. But Joe Ricard makes a good point in post #10, which has to do with proper engine warm-up. Lets face it - the engineers at VW/Porsche didn't go to all the trouble to design this system for no reason, even if it isn't as cold in San Diego as it is in Germany...

I am going through my 914 trying to get everything in place and working. Things I rarely use, if even at all. Things like interior heat and defrost, windshield wipers and squirters. So I decided I do want the original cable/stat in place and functioning. After all, it did work once upon a time...

So, ya got one for me??? smile.gif

Posted by: neil30076 Oct 16 2009, 05:31 PM

QUOTE(johnnie5 @ Oct 16 2009, 04:06 PM) *

RiqueMar, I have been running the flaps on my 2056 in the cooling position for almost the last year as well. But Joe Ricard makes a good point in post #10, which has to do with proper engine warm-up. Lets face it - the engineers at VW/Porsche didn't go to all the trouble to design this system for no reason, even if it isn't as cold in San Diego as it is in Germany...

I am going through my 914 trying to get everything in place and working. Things I rarely use, if even at all. Things like interior heat and defrost, windshield wipers and squirters. So I decided I do want the original cable/stat in place and functioning. After all, it did work once upon a time...

So, ya got one for me??? smile.gif

Johnnie, i removed all the creature comfort heat controls on mine, so if you need the parts that go 'up-front' under the hood to deflect the heat into the cabin let me know, also the heat control that mounts to the floor. Maybe even the dash controls -
Im in SD / RB

Posted by: tat2dphreak Oct 16 2009, 06:05 PM

a bus one would be the same... but still NLA new. I bought a supposed good one, from a reputable seller, and it was too expanded and upon close inspection was cracked :|

the cables are available new, but the t-stat is not.

Posted by: pilothyer Oct 17 2009, 12:22 AM

Wayne....and.....johnnie5... I am almost certain that George at A.A. Stocks / Sells the thermostat bellows New....used ones in good working condition are hard to come by as they seem to expand to the open position and even if put in the freezer won't make them contract....Jerry

Posted by: John Jentz Oct 17 2009, 09:15 AM

QUOTE(johnnie5 @ Oct 16 2009, 05:52 PM) *



Does anybody know if I can buy a new bellows t stat for a bus (and if that will work) so as to get my 'obsolete' warming/cooling flaps functioning properly again?

Or does anyone have a good used 914 one?

Everything explained here http://www.ratwell.com/technical/Thermostats.html . No, they're NLA. Maybe you can find an NOS one somewhere or adapt a Type 1 as described.

VW engineers put this stuff on the engine so it would warm up quickly and stay at a temperature that results in good performance and low engine wear. I use mine, re engineer at your own peril. All of this "you don't need it" is pulled out of the burro.gif . Nobody has tested their engine to failure both ways to form an informed opinion. As always, read, ask, FILTER the replies, research and then form your own opinion.

Posted by: Millerwelds Oct 17 2009, 10:16 AM

My cable for the flaps is modified to attach to the heater lever (no heating stuff being used) on the floor next to the driver's seat so I can maually set the flaps to warm up mode. Once the oil temp gauge shows some good temps I drop the lever to set the flaps to full cool mode. It just makes sense (to me) to get the engine up to temp quickly.


Posted by: johnnie5 Oct 17 2009, 11:18 AM

QUOTE(John Jentz @ Oct 17 2009, 08:15 AM) *

Everything explained here http://www.ratwell.com/technical/Thermostats.html . No, they're NLA. Maybe you can find an NOS one somewhere or adapt a Type 1 as described.

VW engineers put this stuff on the engine so it would warm up quickly and stay at a temperature that results in good performance and low engine wear. I use mine, re engineer at your own peril. All of this "you don't need it" is pulled out of the burro.gif . Nobody has tested their engine to failure both ways to form an informed opinion. As always, read, ask, FILTER the replies, research and then form your own opinion.

Very informative link, thank you John.

Posted by: RiqueMar Oct 17 2009, 12:00 PM

Johnnie, I'm at the shop right now and will check today and have an answer tonight. It really only depends if it's working or not because I know I'm not going to need it.

Neil, if Johnnie passes up on those items, you might have a kid in Oceanside that is interested. biggrin.gif

Powered by Invision Power Board (http://www.invisionboard.com)
© Invision Power Services (http://www.invisionpower.com)