preserve your Rubber with this stuff... |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
914/4: 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 914/6: 70 71 72
preserve your Rubber with this stuff... |
ME733 |
Nov 7 2009, 02:32 PM
Post
#41
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 842 Joined: 25-June 08 From: Atlanta Ga. Member No.: 9,209 Region Association: South East States |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif) ....Well I was fortunate some few years ago to luck up on a no-brand silicone liquid that was like molassis...used it for every rubber part on my cars until it was gone......AND I HAVE FOUND....a product you need to be aware of a product I just discovered. I think It,s new on the market....here goes ...BLACK MAGIC -Titanium....it,s a tire shine product...Its a THICK silicone,almost a gel, and comes with a scrub brush applicator. This stuff is INCREDABLE. I scrubbed down my tires (washed them) several times,allowed them to dry, and in the warm sun applied this stuff to both sides of the tires. They look better than new....Then I started on the rubber bumper tops, and every other rubber part on the car.(914)...it,s been about 3 weeks since I treated the whole car, and the rubber everywhere looks just great!!!...I got clean rags, wiped down most of the rubber parts, which released the imbeded dirt and crud from the rubber. then reapplied it everywhere again. ALL this took about 1/4 of the bottle, which is 16 oz,s. This stuff really works, It soaks into the rubber making it softer, looks great and will last longer than anything I have ever used... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)
|
tod914 |
Dec 7 2009, 09:16 PM
Post
#42
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,755 Joined: 19-January 03 From: Lincoln Park, NJ Member No.: 170 |
Pat to clairify, it was the black coating put on either by the dealer or the factory as an option, after the paint. Have to get a COA to determine who did it. It's certinaly not the Ziebart that's on there. I'll try to get some shots so you see what I mean. I guess it's possible it's tar, but seems to be more of a rubbery compound.
|
Pat Garvey |
Dec 14 2009, 08:41 PM
Post
#43
|
Do I or don't I...........? Group: Members Posts: 5,899 Joined: 24-March 06 From: SE PA, near Philly Member No.: 5,765 Region Association: North East States |
Pat to clairify, it was the black coating put on either by the dealer or the factory as an option, after the paint. Have to get a COA to determine who did it. It's certinaly not the Ziebart that's on there. I'll try to get some shots so you see what I mean. I guess it's possible it's tar, but seems to be more of a rubbery compound. Tod, A COA will probably NOT list any rustproofing, factory or dealer. So, let's get the the facts together on early '70's Ziebart. That way, we can segregate the Ziebart from the factory coatings. Ziebart was tar-based. May have had some wax tossed into it also, but I don't know. What I do know is that a Ziebart treated car had numerous holes drilled into body cavities and structiral parts, to allow spraying the compound into them. On a 914, these areas included: Rear door jambs Front and rear structural hood elements Sail panels Holes were drilled, sprayed into & then capped with plugs. The entire rest of the underbody was sprayed with the same substance. Most cars that have had the treatment still have it on suspension pieces, because the folks at Ziebart thought they were doing a good thing (which they were). Ziebart was not a fools folly - it worked, and still does today. Thiers was a well thought out process that actually helped protect cars, particularly in the rust belt of this country. Now, with that said, the factory wheel well coating was a Schutz compound, which is rubber based and paintable. Both compounds, after these many years, are renewable and paintable. See my earlier text on renewing. Now,the easy way to determine a Ziebart-treated car.......look for the yellow/black/red plastic plugs covering the drilled holes. Hope this helps. Pat |
Tom_T |
Dec 15 2009, 02:19 PM
Post
#44
|
TMI.... Group: Members Posts: 8,320 Joined: 19-March 09 From: Orange, CA Member No.: 10,181 Region Association: Southern California |
Pat to clairify, it was the black coating put on either by the dealer or the factory as an option, after the paint. Have to get a COA to determine who did it. It's certinaly not the Ziebart that's on there. I'll try to get some shots so you see what I mean. I guess it's possible it's tar, but seems to be more of a rubbery compound. Tod, A COA will probably NOT list any rustproofing, factory or dealer. So, let's get the the facts together on early '70's Ziebart. That way, we can segregate the Ziebart from the factory coatings. Ziebart was tar-based. May have had some wax tossed into it also, but I don't know. What I do know is that a Ziebart treated car had numerous holes drilled into body cavities and structiral parts, to allow spraying the compound into them. On a 914, these areas included: Rear door jambs Front and rear structural hood elements Sail panels Holes were drilled, sprayed into & then capped with plugs. The entire rest of the underbody was sprayed with the same substance. Most cars that have had the treatment still have it on suspension pieces, because the folks at Ziebart thought they were doing a good thing (which they were). Ziebart was not a fools folly - it worked, and still does today. Thiers was a well thought out process that actually helped protect cars, particularly in the rust belt of this country. Now, with that said, the factory wheel well coating was a Schutz compound, which is rubber based and paintable. Both compounds, after these many years, are renewable and paintable. See my earlier text on renewing. Now,the easy way to determine a Ziebart-treated car.......look for the yellow/black/red plastic plugs covering the drilled holes. Hope this helps. Pat Thanx for clarifying that Pat. I recall the Ziebart treatment system now, but would've never allowed anyone to punch holes in my 914, esp. with it being overkill out here in Calif., where only sand & cinders were ever used on the mountain roads & high passes with snow. And yes, I did take mine up there with ski racks to ski, and was "caught" in snow on the Grapevine & Cajon Pass a few times as well! So back in the 70's & early 80's it saw some snow, but has/had an aftermarket/dealer undercoating which looks similar to Tod's Red 73 in the pix above. I'll need to remove all of my undercoating to go to bare metal & repair & re-prime/repaint everything, and would like to retreat it afterwards with the best available rubberized undercoating, which I'd probably not paint over & leave black cuz I like that look in the wheel wells on a white/light color car). Is the Porsche body schutz the same product as the Wurth one which someone mentioned above, or a different product? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) ...if different, where can one get the original Porsche body schutz & by what name?? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) ...& is it better, the same or not as good as either the Wurth & 3M etc. "modern" products for their intended purpose of rock/gouge & rust prevention?? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) |
Pat Garvey |
Dec 15 2009, 08:04 PM
Post
#45
|
Do I or don't I...........? Group: Members Posts: 5,899 Joined: 24-March 06 From: SE PA, near Philly Member No.: 5,765 Region Association: North East States |
Pat to clairify, it was the black coating put on either by the dealer or the factory as an option, after the paint. Have to get a COA to determine who did it. It's certinaly not the Ziebart that's on there. I'll try to get some shots so you see what I mean. I guess it's possible it's tar, but seems to be more of a rubbery compound. Tod, A COA will probably NOT list any rustproofing, factory or dealer. So, let's get the the facts together on early '70's Ziebart. That way, we can segregate the Ziebart from the factory coatings. Ziebart was tar-based. May have had some wax tossed into it also, but I don't know. What I do know is that a Ziebart treated car had numerous holes drilled into body cavities and structiral parts, to allow spraying the compound into them. On a 914, these areas included: Rear door jambs Front and rear structural hood elements Sail panels Holes were drilled, sprayed into & then capped with plugs. The entire rest of the underbody was sprayed with the same substance. Most cars that have had the treatment still have it on suspension pieces, because the folks at Ziebart thought they were doing a good thing (which they were). Ziebart was not a fools folly - it worked, and still does today. Thiers was a well thought out process that actually helped protect cars, particularly in the rust belt of this country. Now, with that said, the factory wheel well coating was a Schutz compound, which is rubber based and paintable. Both compounds, after these many years, are renewable and paintable. See my earlier text on renewing. Now,the easy way to determine a Ziebart-treated car.......look for the yellow/black/red plastic plugs covering the drilled holes. Hope this helps. Pat Thanx for clarifying that Pat. I recall the Ziebart treatment system now, but would've never allowed anyone to punch holes in my 914, esp. with it being overkill out here in Calif., where only sand & cinders were ever used on the mountain roads & high passes with snow. And yes, I did take mine up there with ski racks to ski, and was "caught" in snow on the Grapevine & Cajon Pass a few times as well! So back in the 70's & early 80's it saw some snow, but has/had an aftermarket/dealer undercoating which looks similar to Tod's Red 73 in the pix above. I'll need to remove all of my undercoating to go to bare metal & repair & re-prime/repaint everything, and would like to retreat it afterwards with the best available rubberized undercoating, which I'd probably not paint over & leave black cuz I like that look in the wheel wells on a white/light color car). Is the Porsche body schutz the same product as the Wurth one which someone mentioned above, or a different product? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) ...if different, where can one get the original Porsche body schutz & by what name?? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) ...& is it better, the same or not as good as either the Wurth & 3M etc. "modern" products for their intended purpose of rock/gouge & rust prevention?? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Body Schutz IS a 3M product, and was the original used by the Factory, prior to painting. "Schutz" is readily available in bulk (small quantities), or as an aerosol spray. I don't recommend the aerosol beacuse it does not "lay on" with the original texture. A pressure gun (35 psi) is available for the bulk product. I have one around here somewhere, though haven't seen it in 20+ years. If I can find it, you're welcomed to use it. What I said earlier about the aerosol product is not meant to mean tht it doesn't work well - just doesn't give the proper texture. If you want to see the "proper" texture, search for my find on a "snow plow" rear valence. It has the perfect, original texture on the rear (unpainted), and the perfect texture (painted over) on the front side. The aerosol has a the wrong spray head to duplicate this finish. Pat |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 07:58 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |