95mm pistons anyone?, JE forged part number |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
95mm pistons anyone?, JE forged part number |
Seabird |
Oct 20 2014, 01:48 PM
Post
#1
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 165 Joined: 21-November 13 From: United States Member No.: 16,683 Region Association: South East States |
Looks like I am in the engine rebuilding way at the moment. Finally got feed up with trying to figure out what was wrong with my engine/auxiliary systems so I pulled the motor this weekend.
Probably the last time out on track the motor dropped a valve guide. Found one broken secondary spring. And I still haven't pulled the driver side head! Fun fun. Ideally I would like to find quality 95mm pistons (allowed a 1.2mm over bore for the class I am preparing to run) and machine my cylinders to match. There does not seem to be a quality 95mm option on the shelf. (I know AA makes a 95mm piston & cylinder set; I am just not interested in buying it.) My question is: has anyone ordered custom 95mm JE pistons and are willing to share the part number? Alternatively is there a source for forged 94mm flat top pistons? All the forged pistons I can find are 96mm or bigger. Thanks, Miguel |
Mark Henry |
Oct 21 2014, 02:27 PM
Post
#2
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
You also could have gone 94 and had the crank done a hair longer stroke
|
ChrisFoley |
Oct 21 2014, 04:35 PM
Post
#3
|
I am Tangerine Racing Group: Members Posts: 7,958 Joined: 29-January 03 From: Bolton, CT Member No.: 209 Region Association: None |
|
brant |
Oct 21 2014, 05:21 PM
Post
#4
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,739 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
|
Han Solo |
Feb 4 2015, 10:39 AM
Post
#5
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 30-September 13 From: Middle Tennessee Member No.: 16,456 Region Association: South East States |
You also could have gone 94 and had the crank done a hair longer stroke No, the rules allow 1.2mm overbore, but no change in stroke. I agree with chris If this discussion is SCCA Solo... here's an interesting change for 2015 in DP. Per Appendix A for DP... Engines with 2-valves per cylinder: 1.00 x listed displacement (cc) Engines with 2-valves per cylinder are permitted a displacement change of +10% via bore/stroke changes only and with the weight formula accounting for the increased displacement. Which should super cede 17.10 ENGINE - DRIVE TRAIN... H. Block 1. The block may be rebored no more than 0.0472” (1.2 mm) over standard unless otherwise specified in Appendix A. So if my math is correct... if you replace OEM 94mm jugs with 96mm and keep the same stroke that's 1971cc to 2056cc with a 4.3% increase. Correct? But that prepared car would need to weigh in at 2056 lbs. |
brant |
Feb 4 2015, 11:45 AM
Post
#6
|
914 Wizard Group: Members Posts: 11,739 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Colorado Member No.: 47 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
You also could have gone 94 and had the crank done a hair longer stroke No, the rules allow 1.2mm overbore, but no change in stroke. I agree with chris If this discussion is SCCA Solo... here's an interesting change for 2015 in DP. Per Appendix A for DP... Engines with 2-valves per cylinder: 1.00 x listed displacement (cc) Engines with 2-valves per cylinder are permitted a displacement change of +10% via bore/stroke changes only and with the weight formula accounting for the increased displacement. Which should super cede 17.10 ENGINE - DRIVE TRAIN... H. Block 1. The block may be rebored no more than 0.0472” (1.2 mm) over standard unless otherwise specified in Appendix A. So if my math is correct... if you replace OEM 94mm jugs with 96mm and keep the same stroke that's 1971cc to 2056cc with a 4.3% increase. Correct? But that prepared car would need to weigh in at 2056 lbs. vintage racing... usually to older SCCA GCR's |
Han Solo |
Feb 4 2015, 11:56 AM
Post
#7
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 288 Joined: 30-September 13 From: Middle Tennessee Member No.: 16,456 Region Association: South East States |
vintage racing... usually to older SCCA GCR's Copy that. I was surprised and pleased with this change for us. Especially seeing how I've already bought into 96mm (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif) Heck, with those rules you could do 98mm (with the same stroke) and still be legal (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 10:19 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |