CHT sensors GB PN 0280130012, $25 each need 10 takers |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
CHT sensors GB PN 0280130012, $25 each need 10 takers |
Mikey914 |
Sep 23 2017, 10:10 AM
Post
#1
|
The rubber man Group: Members Posts: 12,711 Joined: 27-December 04 From: Hillsboro, OR Member No.: 3,348 Region Association: None |
I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7.
The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul. If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine. -Mark |
914Next |
Sep 23 2017, 11:46 AM
Post
#2
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 702 Joined: 28-July 14 From: Ephraim Wisconsin Member No.: 17,695 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7. The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul. If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine. -Mark Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks. |
Mikey914 |
Sep 25 2017, 02:06 AM
Post
#3
|
The rubber man Group: Members Posts: 12,711 Joined: 27-December 04 From: Hillsboro, OR Member No.: 3,348 Region Association: None |
I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7. The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul. If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine. -Mark Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks. The only difference is that some have a ballast in line with it. If you have one and all your components are in the factory configuration, otherwise do not add one. |
JamesM |
Oct 2 2017, 02:04 AM
Post
#4
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,965 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region |
I've been making these for some time and they were made for the2.0 but also work for the 1.7. The head is stainless steel so will not corrode onto the head like the old ones did. The current creates galvanic corrosion so these will actually wok better over the long haul. If we can sell 10 you save some cash. Bump for the code. I also have several other items going right now too so you can combine. -Mark Mark are there any differences for the '73-'76 2.0's ? Mines a '73. Hasn't gone out yet but will now because I said that. If good for a '73 I'm in. Thanks. The only difference is that some have a ballast in line with it. If you have one and all your components are in the factory configuration, otherwise do not add one. Double check that. If my memory serves me the "proper" sensor for a 73 2.0 setup had a resistance curve that was quite a bit different off by something like >1k ohms when cold. 73 was an odd duck setup as it used a unique CHT and MPS to get the 2.0 to run correctly on the 72 1.7 ECU. 74 the 2.0 got a unique ECU and went back to using sensors with curves closer to the 1.7s. Ill see if I can dig up the data, if not I have both a 73 and 74 setup I can compare. |
JamesM |
Oct 2 2017, 02:31 AM
Post
#5
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,965 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Kearns, UT Member No.: 5,834 Region Association: Intermountain Region |
Looks like Brand Anders has some of the data on his site.
https://members.rennlist.com/pbanders/DJetParts.htm At operating temp they are similar but the warm-up curve is significantly different. Long time ago I had a 73 with a miss matched CHT sensor, ran like absolute garbage until it came up to temp. It will run, warmup is trash though. That was actually the motor i did my first Megasquirt build on because even 15 years ago it was near impossible to find the 017 sensor a 73 2.0 needs. If you want to save guys running 73 2.0s a lot of headaches make a run of these with a thermistor that has the same curve as the 0 280 130 017 sensor. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 11:12 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |