 Tuna can or Deep sump? |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| ottox914 |
 Jan 27 2006, 08:51 AM
Post
#1
|
|
The glory that once was.  Group: Members Posts: 1,302 Joined: 15-December 03 From: Mahtomedi, MN Member No.: 1,438 Region Association: Upper MidWest   |
I'm currently running a "tuna can" on the bottom of the engine for a little more oil and hopefully better oiling during auto cross. Anyone using one of these:
http://aircooled.net/new-bin/viewproductde...ECO0048&cartid= Any thoughts on if this is a reasonable upgrade to make on a car that is auto crossed constantly? |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| DanT |
Jan 27 2006, 09:30 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Going back to the Dark Side! Group: Members Posts: 4,300 Joined: 4-October 04 From: Auburn, CA Member No.: 2,880 Region Association: None |
If your car is lowered, then the deep sump hangs too low. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/ohmy.gif)
If you aren't having oil starvation or heating problems then stay with the Tuna Can. Most all the 914s in PCA-GGR run Tuna Cans for Time Trial with no problems. (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/smile.gif) |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
ottox914 Tuna can or Deep sump? Jan 27 2006, 08:51 AM
Brett W One of the problems with the big deep sump, is the... Jan 27 2006, 09:16 AM Brando Keep the tuna can. I use it and never have any pro... Jan 27 2006, 10:37 AM jhadler Tuna Can. If you're still having starvation pr... Jan 27 2006, 11:44 AM
Jake Raby I prefer the deep sump and don't like the Tuna... Jan 27 2006, 04:08 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 02:26 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.