Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Serpentine Belt-- Updated Thread
914World.com > The 914 Forums > 914World Garage
Robarabian
Ok, here is my stab at an installation thread.

1) I am a home mechanic, not the Red Barn. Please be constructive, I am sure there are several better ways, but this is what I did and it works... at least so far.

2) You will see a red fan and a silver fan. I had to switch them in the end, for alignment purposes. I haven't figured out why yet.

3) I love the way it turned out.

Here goes nothing...:

You start by removing your pulleys from both the fan and the crank. The crank one goes on easy, and I used a new bolt that I bought with the kit from Clewitt.


The instructions say to make sure there are no burrs on your fan. This is important. It was a tight fit, I ended up doing a bit of sanding and cleaning up the fan pulley area to get the Clewitt pulley to fit on and off. It says you can use shims to make sure everything is straight.

I used my 911 cam chain straight edge that I got from Stomski Racing to line up the pulleys.

Once you know they are in alignment, you need to mount the tensioner. In my case, I had to fabricate a bracket. On the left side, the tins would be in the way on my particular engine. I used the right side mount bolt.

Note: Clewitt's tensioner is on an eccentric, so it can be tensioned from either side, it is a universal as far as that goes. It works at about any angle.

I used a beefy angle mount I had, and a piece of straight / flat bar. After measuring it up, I mig welded both sides, and ground em down a bit since I am not a super welder.

I drilled the mounting holes and mounted it up. Once it is in place, I fiddled with where I wanted it. I notched my angle mount so it would sort of catch my engine mount and lock into place to avoid any rotation due to tension. I got lucky here.

After test fitting it and tensioning it, I shortened one end and then painted it black. Clewitt pre-threads it, so I noticed the tensioner wasn't in perfect alignment. I used a few washers between the mount I made and the tensioner to shim it forward slightly and it popped into perfect alignment.

It looks pretty slick and the belt change is as simple as loosening the eccentric bolt, rotating the tensioner either direction and removing the belt. You re-tension it and allow for 1/4 inch deflection. Richard Clewitt said not to over tension it, or you can either put wear on the alternator bearing or the tensioner, but he said it is designed that the tensioner will fail before an alternator bearing. Replacements are pretty cheap.

You shouldn't have to fabricate anything if you are using the Rich Johnson type mount, as it has the provisions for the tensioner to bolt directly to. This is just what I had to do.

See photos.

Click to view attachment Click to view attachmentClick to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachmentClick to view attachment Click to view attachment
ClayPerrine
QUOTE(Robarabian @ Aug 26 2023, 04:46 PM) *

Ok, here is my stab at an installation thread.

1) I am a home mechanic, not the Red Barn. Please be constructive, I am sure there are several better ways, but this is what I did and it works... at least so far.

2) You will see a red fan and a silver fan. I had to switch them in the end, for alignment purposes. I haven't figured out why yet.

3) I love the way it turned out.

Here goes nothing...:

You start by removing your pulleys from both the fan and the crank. The crank one goes on easy, and I used a new bolt that I bought with the kit from Clewitt.


The instructions say to make sure there are no burrs on your fan. This is important. It was a tight fit, I ended up doing a bit of sanding and cleaning up the fan pulley area to get the Clewitt pulley to fit on and off. It says you can use shims to make sure everything is straight.

I used my 911 cam chain straight edge that I got from Stomski Racing to line up the pulleys.

Once you know they are in alignment, you need to mount the tensioner. In my case, I had to fabricate a bracket. On the left side, the tins would be in the way on my particular engine. I used the right side mount bolt.

Note: Clewitt's tensioner is on an eccentric, so it can be tensioned from either side, it is a universal as far as that goes. It works at about any angle.

I used a beefy angle mount I had, and a piece of straight / flat bar. After measuring it up, I mig welded both sides, and ground em down a bit since I am not a super welder.

I drilled the mounting holes and mounted it up. Once it is in place, I fiddled with where I wanted it. I notched my angle mount so it would sort of catch my engine mount and lock into place to avoid any rotation due to tension. I got lucky here.

After test fitting it and tensioning it, I shortened one end and then painted it black. Clewitt pre-threads it, so I noticed the tensioner wasn't in perfect alignment. I used a few washers between the mount I made and the tensioner to shim it forward slightly and it popped into perfect alignment.

It looks pretty slick and the belt change is as simple as loosening the eccentric bolt, rotating the tensioner either direction and removing the belt. You re-tension it and allow for 1/4 inch deflection. Richard Clewitt said not to over tension it, or you can either put wear on the alternator bearing or the tensioner, but he said it is designed that the tensioner will fail before an alternator bearing. Replacements are pretty cheap.

You shouldn't have to fabricate anything if you are using the Rich Johnson type mount, as it has the provisions for the tensioner to bolt directly to. This is just what I had to do.

See photos.

Click to view attachment Click to view attachmentClick to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachmentClick to view attachment Click to view attachment



The only thing I would have for a comment would be that it is better to have the tensioner on the other side of the belt. The side you have it on is under tension, and the other side is not.

Other than that, it is a great installation.
Robarabian
I sent the photos to Clewitt to get his opinion. I will have to look into that. My space is limited on the other side it would take a bit more "magic" to make it happen on that side. I'll play around with some ideas for sure.

Thank you for chiming in, you have done this so I trust your knowledge.


QUOTE(ClayPerrine @ Aug 26 2023, 02:56 PM) *

QUOTE(Robarabian @ Aug 26 2023, 04:46 PM) *

Ok, here is my stab at an installation thread.

1) I am a home mechanic, not the Red Barn. Please be constructive, I am sure there are several better ways, but this is what I did and it works... at least so far.

2) You will see a red fan and a silver fan. I had to switch them in the end, for alignment purposes. I haven't figured out why yet.

3) I love the way it turned out.

Here goes nothing...:

You start by removing your pulleys from both the fan and the crank. The crank one goes on easy, and I used a new bolt that I bought with the kit from Clewitt.


The instructions say to make sure there are no burrs on your fan. This is important. It was a tight fit, I ended up doing a bit of sanding and cleaning up the fan pulley area to get the Clewitt pulley to fit on and off. It says you can use shims to make sure everything is straight.

I used my 911 cam chain straight edge that I got from Stomski Racing to line up the pulleys.

Once you know they are in alignment, you need to mount the tensioner. In my case, I had to fabricate a bracket. On the left side, the tins would be in the way on my particular engine. I used the right side mount bolt.

Note: Clewitt's tensioner is on an eccentric, so it can be tensioned from either side, it is a universal as far as that goes. It works at about any angle.

I used a beefy angle mount I had, and a piece of straight / flat bar. After measuring it up, I mig welded both sides, and ground em down a bit since I am not a super welder.

I drilled the mounting holes and mounted it up. Once it is in place, I fiddled with where I wanted it. I notched my angle mount so it would sort of catch my engine mount and lock into place to avoid any rotation due to tension. I got lucky here.

After test fitting it and tensioning it, I shortened one end and then painted it black. Clewitt pre-threads it, so I noticed the tensioner wasn't in perfect alignment. I used a few washers between the mount I made and the tensioner to shim it forward slightly and it popped into perfect alignment.

It looks pretty slick and the belt change is as simple as loosening the eccentric bolt, rotating the tensioner either direction and removing the belt. You re-tension it and allow for 1/4 inch deflection. Richard Clewitt said not to over tension it, or you can either put wear on the alternator bearing or the tensioner, but he said it is designed that the tensioner will fail before an alternator bearing. Replacements are pretty cheap.

You shouldn't have to fabricate anything if you are using the Rich Johnson type mount, as it has the provisions for the tensioner to bolt directly to. This is just what I had to do.

See photos.

Click to view attachment Click to view attachmentClick to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachment Click to view attachmentClick to view attachment Click to view attachment



The only thing I would have for a comment would be that it is better to have the tensioner on the other side of the belt. The side you have it on is under tension, and the other side is not.

Other than that, it is a great installation.

jim_hoyland
Nice presentation Rob smile.gif
Cairo94507
I think that is a significant improvement over the stock setup. idea.gif beerchug.gif
mb911
I would love this setup. Need to sell more oil tanks first
Robarabian
Ok, I got some feedback from Clewitt, and he also suggested the tensioner to not be on the "loaded" side. Back to the drawing board. Here is what I ended up doing.

I had to sort of make a staircase shaped upright. I used a similar design across it perpendicularly. It was a little thinner due to the area, so I ended up doing a tie in "down the backside of the stairs" and put a floor under the tensioner to give it less resistance to flex. There is not too much stress on the part so it is overbuilt at this point. See photos for update.

Necessity is the mother of all invention I guess. I had to notch a 1/4 x 1/4 area of the tin, but it fits nice now.

Click to view attachmentClick to view attachmentClick to view attachment[attachmentid=886
078]Click to view attachmentClick to view attachmentClick to view attachment[attachmentid
=886082]
arbitrary
@Robarabian how is the tensioner mount working out? Ingenious solution!
Cairo94507
Congratulations on getting that sorted. We installed this serpentine belt system from Clewett on my 3.6; the saddest part is you can't see how beautiful it is. Great belt system. beerchug.gif

On my 3.6 all we had to do was knock down one spot per install instructions.

Click to view attachment
Montreal914
Curious as to what made this installation a custom one on your engine? confused24.gif

Isn't the Clewett setup a bolt-on kit?

Thank you for sharing! It defnitely looks like an improvement over the stock setup. smile.gif
Robarabian
Not with the mount I have. I have the one that is like Patrick Motorsports.. two welded mounts with a bar in the middle.


Unfortunately, after all that fabrication ( which I had fun with by the way) I couldn't get it to fit. The mount makes it tough with space against the firewall. I would have had to cut the channel that that holds the rubber engine seal and I didn't want to do that.

With a stock 914-6 mount, it bolts right up. So it sits on the shelf as a pretty piece of well made equipment till I find some non running 911, slap a motor in it and use the setup there.

QUOTE(Montreal914 @ Dec 4 2024, 08:38 AM) *

Curious as to what made this installation a custom one on your engine? confused24.gif

Isn't the Clewett setup a bolt-on kit?



Thank you for sharing! It defnitely looks like an improvement over the stock setup. smile.gif
ClayPerrine
What I did on my 2.4L with this same setup is to use a timing belt tensioner from a Nissan VG30 engine to tension the belt. I put an extension on the motor mount to bring the right hand arm up higher, and mounted the tensioner on it. It is eccentric, so twisting the tensioner makes the belt tighter.

I did this years ago on my 2.4L. I did a search on here looking for the thread with the pictures of this. I found the thread, but the pictures just show "IPB Image".

I will see if I can locate them on my file server. Lots of crap there so it may take some time.

Montreal914
@Robarabian Are you using the Naro mount?

Click to view attachment
Robarabian
Yes. that is the one. I actually really like it for the most part. Makes engine drop or maintenance easy. You can actually loosen the trans mounts and rotate it downward if you need to get to something.. for instance. I did a full trans swap once by pivoting it, bracing the motor and swapping the trans.

Downside is clearance for the Serpentine belt setup, and you really can't get to the crank bolt to turn the motor with a socket. But putting the engine in and taking it out is eZ PZ especially if you are using a lift and a lift table like I do.


QUOTE(Montreal914 @ Dec 5 2024, 07:15 AM) *

@Robarabian Are you using the Naro mount?

Click to view attachment

Robarabian

I'd love to see close ups of that Clay. I really liked the quality of Clewitt's setup, I just dont have room with the mount I had to make...



QUOTE(ClayPerrine @ Dec 5 2024, 05:50 AM) *

What I did on my 2.4L with this same setup is to use a timing belt tensioner from a Nissan VG30 engine to tension the belt. I put an extension on the motor mount to bring the right hand arm up higher, and mounted the tensioner on it. It is eccentric, so twisting the tensioner makes the belt tighter.

I did this years ago on my 2.4L. I did a search on here looking for the thread with the pictures of this. I found the thread, but the pictures just show "IPB Image".

I will see if I can locate them on my file server. Lots of crap there so it may take some time.

Robarabian

I'd love to see close ups of that Clay. I really liked the quality of Clewitt's setup, I just dont have room with the mount I had to make...



QUOTE(ClayPerrine @ Dec 5 2024, 05:50 AM) *

What I did on my 2.4L with this same setup is to use a timing belt tensioner from a Nissan VG30 engine to tension the belt. I put an extension on the motor mount to bring the right hand arm up higher, and mounted the tensioner on it. It is eccentric, so twisting the tensioner makes the belt tighter.

I did this years ago on my 2.4L. I did a search on here looking for the thread with the pictures of this. I found the thread, but the pictures just show "IPB Image".

I will see if I can locate them on my file server. Lots of crap there so it may take some time.

live free & drive
The Naro mount puts the engine 1/2” closer to the firewall
Robarabian
That would explain why it was so tight... I think Clay's solution may work though.... My mount is what was running in the way, not the pulley...

QUOTE(live free & drive @ Dec 5 2024, 07:01 PM) *

The Naro mount puts the engine 1/2” closer to the firewall

mb911
QUOTE(live free & drive @ Dec 5 2024, 07:01 PM) *

The Naro mount puts the engine 1/2” closer to the firewall


And also lower in the chassis so the engine seal doesn’t seal. Not a fan of that mount for those 2 reasons
Robarabian
My engine seal, seals fine. It is a newly replaced seal, is supple rubber and stretches no problem. An older cracking seal probably not.


QUOTE(mb911 @ Dec 6 2024, 07:00 AM) *

QUOTE(live free & drive @ Dec 5 2024, 07:01 PM) *

The Naro mount puts the engine 1/2” closer to the firewall


And also lower in the chassis so the engine seal doesn’t seal. Not a fan of that mount for those 2 reasons

mb911
QUOTE(Robarabian @ Dec 6 2024, 07:21 AM) *

My engine seal, seals fine. It is a newly replaced seal, is supple rubber and stretches no problem. An older cracking seal probably not.


QUOTE(mb911 @ Dec 6 2024, 07:00 AM) *

QUOTE(live free & drive @ Dec 5 2024, 07:01 PM) *

The Naro mount puts the engine 1/2” closer to the firewall


And also lower in the chassis so the engine seal doesn’t seal. Not a fan of that mount for those 2 reasons




So they may have modified directions in the last 4/5 years as we followed directions on a customer car and it placed the engine to low. That mount is now being removed in favor of a stock style mount because it put the fan too close to the fire wall causing cooling issues. We removed the insulation and that helped cooling immensely. Again mistake was following directions for placement.
Montreal914
QUOTE(mb911 @ Dec 6 2024, 07:00 AM) *

QUOTE(live free & drive @ Dec 5 2024, 07:01 PM) *

The Naro mount puts the engine 1/2” closer to the firewall


And also lower in the chassis so the engine seal doesn’t seal. Not a fan of that mount for those 2 reasons



@live free & drive , @mb911

These are two very good piece of information. smilie_pokal.gif I was wondering about how to know/set the mount to ensure the engine is precisely where it is supposed to be. sad.gif

I guess one could bring the engine in the bay but that is quite an undertake. Are there any rereference points/distances that can be measure between engine and chassis that could help this engine mount positioning without the use of the actual engine?

Is there anything preventing shiming out the base of the Naro engine mount away from the firewall? Abeit 1/2" is a lot! blink.gif

Is there anything preventing the mount to be installed higher so the tin can settle properly with the chassis seal?

I can't see my installation not fitting properly in that seal, this will not look right in my book. dry.gif

Thank you for the input, sorry for the small drift in OPs thread. unsure.gif
The Clewitt upgrade seems really nice but a few picture examples of 914s integration would be helpfull. Obviously designed for the 911 rear engine configuration, seems trickier on 914s especially with the various engine mount options on the market.
mb911
QUOTE(Montreal914 @ Dec 6 2024, 08:24 AM) *

QUOTE(mb911 @ Dec 6 2024, 07:00 AM) *

QUOTE(live free & drive @ Dec 5 2024, 07:01 PM) *

The Naro mount puts the engine 1/2” closer to the firewall


And also lower in the chassis so the engine seal doesn’t seal. Not a fan of that mount for those 2 reasons



@live free & drive , @mb911

These are two very good piece of information. smilie_pokal.gif I was wondering about how to know/set the mount to ensure the engine is precisely where it is supposed to be. sad.gif

I guess one could bring the engine in the bay but that is quite an undertake. Are there any rereference points/distances that can be measure between engine and chassis that could help this engine mount positioning without the use of the actual engine?

Is there anything preventing shiming out the base of the Naro engine mount away from the firewall? Abeit 1/2" is a lot! blink.gif

Is there anything preventing the mount to be installed higher so the tin can settle properly with the chassis seal?

I can't see my installation not fitting properly in that seal, this will not look right in my book. dry.gif

Thank you for the input, sorry for the small drift in OPs thread. unsure.gif
The Clewitt upgrade seems really nice but a few picture examples of 914s integration would be helpfull. Obviously designed for the 911 rear engine configuration, seems trickier on 914s especially with the various engine mount options on the market.



Nothing prevents you from doing that but ask yourself why would you need to or want to? Do you drive that many miles in a year that simply removing the engine is going to be that big of deal? I just recently tipped my engine down on a stock style mount . Removed the alternator easy peasy.
Montreal914
...will discuss this in a different thread. My questions relate more to the installation of the Naro mount. Thanks.
live free & drive
Just for some tight numbers onthe Naro mount; if you locate it where they indicate the motor is 0.82" low - this can be rectified by welding the mount upward by 0.82".

The other issue is that the Naro mount puts the engine 0.5" closer to the firewall so you would need to space off the mounts 0.5" from the firewall.

The Patrick mount has offsets too that I have measured that are similar, but not exactly the same - If someone wants those I could dig them up (it's all in CAD).

I had the Naro mount installed, but am going to cut it out and go with the original style mount beefed up per Ralph Meany/Paul Tosi
ClayPerrine
This isn't the exact picture I was looking for, but it will do to explain what I am talking about.

I extended the arm on the motor mount so it went up farther. That way I could put the idlers on to be able to mount the compressor over the valve cover on the right hand side. It worked fine, until the compressor mount cracked the timing cover.

Click to view attachment

If you extend the arm on the mount, and put a dynamic tensioner on it, similar to the one below, you should be able to run your serpentine belt setup.

Click to view attachment

I will keep looking for the picture of the belt with the tensioner.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2026 Invision Power Services, Inc.