QUOTE(mb911 @ Nov 29 2024, 11:35 AM)

I run these on my 2.4 with 1.5 inch sleeves in them and they work really well for me.
^ Cool, and good data point.
I'd imagine they're good for a warm 2.2 then as well, perhaps sacrificing a little torque down low while gaining a little top end power. I'm sure a bit of dyno time would be required to readjust the carbs, but that would be well worth it to regain substantive cabin heat.
Have long been weighing $3k for non-factory HEs vs other paths such as heated seats, gas heater, electric heat, etc. Most solutions have been tough to justify for an occasional use car, and one mainly used on warm days. I doubt I'm alone in that, so I'd guess there is a reasonably sized addressable market for a solution that presents real quality and real value. This seems promising.
QUOTE(mb911 @ Nov 29 2024, 11:35 AM)

I know you have talked many times about one heat exchanger but why ? If you have 2 of the cores make them both functional and if you don’t hook up the other side so be it. From a valve adjustment standpoint point they are about the same as any other heat exchanger. Nothing is easy while the engine is in the car.
Reasons would include:
Weight & complexity (HE shell + flapper valve + hoses + linkage)
Need for my use case vs 914 as a daily car in period (I found SSIs oversupplied my cabin with heat with a four; I was often turning the heat down on cold days with the roof off, and I also remember heat bleed from the longitudinals on very hot days even after buying new flapper valves, to the point of turning on the heat at the windshield in the hope if would bleed off—so cutting off 50% of the source is interesting to me)
Access (agree few things are easy with the six in the car)