AB 2683 passed Senate Transportation Cmte., Bummer! |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
AB 2683 passed Senate Transportation Cmte., Bummer! |
carreraguy |
Jul 1 2004, 11:49 AM
Post
#1
|
It's not your dad's 914! Group: Members Posts: 1,197 Joined: 17-October 03 From: San Jose, CA Member No.: 1,256 Region Association: Northern California |
Lookin bad for my Teener! Now I guess we talk to Arnold?
--------------------------------- COMPLETE BILL HISTORY BILL NUMBER : A.B. No. 2683 AUTHOR : Lieber TOPIC : Air pollution: smog check. TYPE OF BILL : Active Non-Urgency Non-Appropriations Majority Vote Required State-Mandated Local Program Fiscal Non-Tax Levy BILL HISTORY 2004 June 30 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.). June 9 Referred to Com. on TRANS. May 27 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. May 26 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 47. Noes 28. Page 6075.) May 24 Read second time. To third reading. May 20 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 6.) (May 19). Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading. Apr. 21 In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. Apr. 13 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (April 12). Mar. 25 Re-referred to Com. on TRANS. Mar. 24 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. Read second time and amended. Mar. 8 Referred to Com. on TRANS. Feb. 22 From printer. May be heard in committee March 23. Feb. 20 Read first time. To print. |
Chris Julian |
Jul 1 2004, 12:18 PM
Post
#2
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 19-March 04 From: SF Bay area Member No.: 1,821 |
"A.B. 2683, the California legislation that would repeal the state's current rolling emissions test exemption for vehicles 30 years old and older. As you are aware, A.B. 2683 would repeal the current pro-hobbyist exemption and replace it with a law requiring the permanent testing of all 1976 and newer model vehicles. Despite thousands of your messages in opposition, the bill passed in the California Assembly and will now be considered in the Senate. We must now focus our efforts on the Senate Transportation Committee!"
Hey Guys, I pulled this off of another car forum. Can anyone veryify? looks like 1975 and older are clear? Chris |
lapuwali |
Jul 1 2004, 12:49 PM
Post
#3
|
Not another one! Group: Benefactors Posts: 4,526 Joined: 1-March 04 From: San Mateo, CA Member No.: 1,743 |
Yes, '75 and older are clear. 1976 and later would not be exempt next year, or any other year until someone else comes up and moves the goalposts again. Full details on the Assembly and Senate websites.
This has cleared the transportation committee, but still has to be rubber-stamped in Appropriations and the full Senate before Arnold sees it. I'm trying to find out who voted which way. The Senator from my district is on the Trans committee, and I'd like to know if she listened. She voted against the Florez bill, and I'm hoping she was one of the no votes here, too. |
SLITS |
Jul 1 2004, 01:55 PM
Post
#4
|
"This Utah shit is HARSH!" Group: Benefactors Posts: 13,602 Joined: 22-February 04 From: SoCal Mountains ... Member No.: 1,696 Region Association: None |
Ok, I'm not a math whiz, but this is 2004 not 2005 and 30 years old would be 1974.
So tell me how a 1975 is smog exempt in the year 2004? And don't give me the "build date" bullshit, I tried that with my '74 and still had to wait until Jan of 2004 to register it. |
lapuwali |
Jul 1 2004, 02:14 PM
Post
#5
|
Not another one! Group: Benefactors Posts: 4,526 Joined: 1-March 04 From: San Mateo, CA Member No.: 1,743 |
DMV math. It literally says on their website it's the current year - 29, so 1975 is currently exempt. My theory is they're interpreting it as 30 years from the year on the sticker they hand you (currently handing out 2005 stickers). In other words, 30 years from when the license expires, not 30 years from when the license is granted.
|
carreraguy |
Jul 1 2004, 02:15 PM
Post
#6
|
It's not your dad's 914! Group: Members Posts: 1,197 Joined: 17-October 03 From: San Jose, CA Member No.: 1,256 Region Association: Northern California |
Slits:
Current CA law states that "vehicles with a year model 30 years or older are exempt from smog certification requirements. Current calendar year less 29 years equals the year model exempt; i.e. 2004 less 29 equals 1975. Therefore, 1976 cars would be exempt in 2005 under the current law. Details at: http://www.dmv.ca.gov/vr/smogfaq.htm |
wheelo |
Jul 1 2004, 06:09 PM
Post
#7
|
Dude Group: Members Posts: 265 Joined: 19-March 04 From: San Rafael, Ca Member No.: 1,818 |
Bummer ...That just SUCKS....
Maybe the Govanator can save us ? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) |
Rusty |
Jul 2 2004, 01:54 AM
Post
#8
|
Wanted: Engine case GA003709 Group: Admin Posts: 7,952 Joined: 24-December 02 From: North Alabama Member No.: 6 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
This sucks.
Well, I guess it goes to a full session vote next. Anyone know when that will be? How can we help put a full-court press on Senators? -Rusty (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smoke.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd September 2024 - 12:07 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |