Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

13 Pages V « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> 1971 Gold Metallic Project, The Turbo 1.7
kevin311
post Jun 26 2013, 08:50 AM
Post #81


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 22-May 10
From: Tampa Bay Area
Member No.: 11,752
Region Association: None



I love this thread. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif)
I have been gathering parts to do this also, after I finish my ITBs. Im already running MSII and I have a really small turbo from an old volvo that I used on my T1 sandrail with SS oil feed and drain lines.
This thread is making me really anxious to get to work!

Great work! Really an inspiration!

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) Kevin
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 26 2013, 10:27 AM
Post #82


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(ConeDodger @ Jun 25 2013, 11:10 PM) *

I was struck by how driveable it was. This isn't a beast that you couldn't talk your wife into riding in. It retains the character of the 1.7 but has an "I want to go play" attitude.
I can just imagine how nice this would be with a freshly built balanced engine and a good quiet well flowing muffler. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif)

With the right heads... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/evilgrin.gif)

I've been pondering the engine build. Definitely have to stay 1.7 because everything is matched to that. The bottom end would stay pretty much the same, but some head work could open things up. The 1.7 heads are pretty restricting. Maybe just using 1.8 heads would work better. I could do 2.0 heads but would need some tweaking because the intake system is based on 1.7 four bolt runners. Or 2.0 heads with four studs (did someone say LE200? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif) ). According to Corky Bell's book, stock cams are actually really good for turboing. Not sure if I would want to risk the unknown effects by swapping to another cam. Part of the drivability is the copious idle vacuum, which goes away if I run a cam with overlap. Sure, I gain top end, but I'm not looking for that. But if I build this new engine, it'll be balanced in every respect. I've been wanting to build a crazy blueprinted engine for awhile now, and I think this is the build to do it on.

The muffler is a 3" inlet/outlet Hooker Header muffler. It's huge. If anything is restricting the exhaust flow it's the turbo. I'm tempted to try the K04, but I'm also liking just driving my car. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif)

And then there's always that slippery slope of adding more boost. ottox914 is running 12+psi. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) I think I'm afraid of this though, to be honest. There are so many turbo horror stories out there. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 26 2013, 10:28 AM
Post #83


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



QUOTE(kevin311 @ Jun 26 2013, 07:50 AM) *

I love this thread. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/piratenanner.gif)
I have been gathering parts to do this also, after I finish my ITBs. Im already running MSII and I have a really small turbo from an old volvo that I used on my T1 sandrail with SS oil feed and drain lines.
This thread is making me really anxious to get to work!

Great work! Really an inspiration!

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) Kevin

Thanks! Go for it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif) And keep us posted... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris H.
post Jun 26 2013, 10:46 AM
Post #84


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,049
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Chicago 'burbs
Member No.: 73
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE

...The 1.7 heads are pretty restricting. Maybe just using 1.8 heads would work better....Part of the drivability is the copious idle vacuum, which goes away if I run a cam with overlap. Sure, I gain top end, but I'm not looking for that. But if I build this new engine, it'll be balanced in every respect. I've been wanting to build a crazy blueprinted engine for awhile now, and I think this is the build to do it on.


Now you're killing me...I'll have a 1.8 left over from my transplant....hmmmmm... maybe I won't sell it.

BTW Mark I think I have a set of original blue California license plates from a 1971 Fastback...bought it in the late '80's and registered it here so they should be long gone out of the system by now. You can have them if you want. Would be perfect for your gold teener rebuild. 341 are the first 3 digits of the plate to confirm....I read somewhere the plate has to be from the same year car to reuse them.

User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 26 2013, 10:49 AM
Post #85


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Thanks Chris. From what I've read that plate process only applied to 1969 and earlier car. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) But I suppose it would be worth it to put the paperwork through anyway might get lucky. I would love it to be blue plates...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris H.
post Jun 26 2013, 10:50 AM
Post #86


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,049
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Chicago 'burbs
Member No.: 73
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(McMark @ Jun 26 2013, 11:49 AM) *

Thanks Chris. From what I've read that plate process only applied to 1969 and earlier car. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) But I suppose it would be worth it to put the paperwork through anyway might get lucky. I would love it to be blue plates...


PM me your address... I'll dig them out this weekend. At the very least you can slap them on at meets. I'll never use them.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Jun 26 2013, 11:08 AM
Post #87


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,944
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(McMark @ Jun 26 2013, 09:27 AM) *
I could do ...

Don't ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

The thing that makes this so interesting is the fact that it would be a bolt on solution to a *STOCK* 1.7L engine!

And there are so many of them out there. If you can make this work with a stock cam and stock heads and be able to sell it as a complete kit, you will be way ahead.

Once people have to split the case or even just swap heads, you lost 2/3 of your customer base right there.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
effutuo101
post Jun 26 2013, 11:13 AM
Post #88


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,735
Joined: 10-April 05
From: Lemon Grove
Member No.: 3,914
Region Association: Southern California



I have a couple of small SUBY turbos if you think they would help a build. VF31 and VF 32. They can off my twin turbo motor, and I am going to a single screw set up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 26 2013, 07:57 PM
Post #89


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



So... I learned today that my gas gauge doesn't go below 1/4 tank.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/hide.gif)

Luckily I ran out of gas basically in Trekkor's driveway. I owe ya big time, buddy. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Jun 26 2013, 10:36 PM
Post #90


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,346
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



You could always run E85. Stays cooler at higher boost levels. less detonation...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ConeDodger
post Jun 26 2013, 10:45 PM
Post #91


Apex killer!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 23,852
Joined: 31-December 04
From: Tahoe Area
Member No.: 3,380
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(McMark @ Jun 26 2013, 08:27 AM) *

QUOTE(ConeDodger @ Jun 25 2013, 11:10 PM) *

I was struck by how driveable it was. This isn't a beast that you couldn't talk your wife into riding in. It retains the character of the 1.7 but has an "I want to go play" attitude.
I can just imagine how nice this would be with a freshly built balanced engine and a good quiet well flowing muffler. : (IMG:style_emoticons/default/evilgrin.gif) driving:

With the right heads... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/evilgrin.gif)
There are so many turbo horror stories out there. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/unsure.gif)


Turn up the boost. The worst horror you can do at this point is scatter a throw-away 1.7 all over the pavement. 7psi is factory turbo street car range. 12 is still pretty casual... You know the first step to recovery is admitting you want more boost!!! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/evilgrin.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
r_towle
post Jun 27 2013, 07:32 AM
Post #92


Custom Member
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 24,661
Joined: 9-January 03
From: Taxachusetts
Member No.: 124
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jun 26 2013, 01:08 PM) *

QUOTE(McMark @ Jun 26 2013, 09:27 AM) *
I could do ...

Don't ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

The thing that makes this so interesting is the fact that it would be a bolt on solution to a *STOCK* 1.7L engine!

And there are so many of them out there. If you can make this work with a stock cam and stock heads and be able to sell it as a complete kit, you will be way ahead.

Once people have to split the case or even just swap heads, you lost 2/3 of your customer base right there.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/popcorn[1].gif)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Chris H.
post Jun 27 2013, 08:03 AM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,049
Joined: 2-January 03
From: Chicago 'burbs
Member No.: 73
Region Association: Upper MidWest



This could be interesting for Bay Window bus owners too. They aren't looking for massive boost, just a little more ooomph to push those toasters around.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 27 2013, 10:50 PM
Post #94


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Put in the new spark plugs. Didn't notice a difference.
Installed a new CHT sensor so I can turn cold start enrichment back on.

Still fighting some pinging. Sunday I'm going to pull out 10 degrees of timing and just see if it's possible to make it stop. If that doesn't work I need to sit down and think about what's causing this problem. Could be that the spark plugs are still too hot. Could be that the MS is doing something odd or the coils I'm using aren't up to it.

I also found out (by actually looking) that my engine is 8.2:1 compression, it's a W code engine. This is higher than I thought, but comparing it to other turbo engines out there it isn't out of line. ottox914 is running ~9:1 and 12+ psi of boost. I have a feeling something more than just tuning is the issue. I honestly don't expect pulling timing to make any difference, and the AFR while pinging is 10 to 1. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Jun 27 2013, 10:59 PM
Post #95


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



when is it pining?

high load lower rpm, high load high rpm?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 27 2013, 11:01 PM
Post #96


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Pretty much anytime over 3/4 throttle (2600 RPM and above)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
monkeyboy
post Jun 27 2013, 11:02 PM
Post #97


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 808
Joined: 8-June 08
From: Los Angeles, Ca
Member No.: 9,147
Region Association: None



Possible sharp edge in the head getting too hot?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 27 2013, 11:06 PM
Post #98


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Possible. Who knows. Gotta eliminate the tuning possibility first.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Jun 27 2013, 11:07 PM
Post #99


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



you might have to add a boost indexed ign retard
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jun 27 2013, 11:33 PM
Post #100


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Yeah, I've got a Spark Advance MAP I play with. I'm also going to try pulling the coil dwell time down from the currect 3.8ms setting to 2.5ms and see what kinds of effects that has. These coils are generic manufacturer coils, so I'm thinking that a much lower dwell may be necessary to keep the coils happy. I've already pulled about 8 degrees of timing and it's already running rich, and I'm only pushing 5psi of boost.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

13 Pages V « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
19 User(s) are reading this topic (19 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th December 2024 - 08:08 PM