 2.0 Engine weight |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
  |
| abnrdo |
 Feb 19 2011, 11:21 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 399 Joined: 24-September 04 From: Panama City, FL Member No.: 2,820 Region Association: South East States  |
Anyone know what a 73 2.0 engine weighs? I am considering all my options.
Originally I was looking at a LS1 or LS2 conversion, which I really like. My 75 (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wub.gif) is very rust free, so I am not sure about cutting such a nice chassis. There is a parts car close to me: http://kansascity.craigslist.org/cto/2191962145.html Thoughts??? -Jim Attached thumbnail(s) 
|
   |
 
|
| detoxcowboy |
Feb 19 2011, 11:48 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,294 Joined: 30-January 08 Member No.: 8,642 Region Association: Africa |
Porsche 2.0 Liter Engine
Total weight, dry approx. 146 kg / 321 lb http://www.pelicanparts.com/914/technical_..._tech_specs.htm And for the Porsche 1.7 & 1.8 Engines Total weight, dry approx. 126 kg/277 lb http://www.pelicanparts.com/914/technical_..._tech_specs.htm |
|
|
|
| orange914 |
Feb 19 2011, 12:19 PM
Post
#3
|
|
http://5starmediaworks.com/index.html Group: Members Posts: 3,371 Joined: 26-March 05 From: Ceres, California Member No.: 3,818 Region Association: Northern California |
QUOTE(detoxcowboy @ Feb 19 2011, 09:48 AM)  Porsche 2.0 Liter Engine Total weight, dry approx. 146 kg / 321 lb http://www.pelicanparts.com/914/technical_..._tech_specs.htm And for the Porsche 1.7 & 1.8 Engines Total weight, dry approx. 126 kg/277 lb http://www.pelicanparts.com/914/technical_..._tech_specs.htm 44 lbs. differance between 1.7/1.8 and 2.0? |
|
|
|
| brp986s |
Feb 19 2011, 01:48 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 434 Joined: 27-September 07 From: los angeles Member No.: 8,167 |
It would be a shame to hack up a rare good chassis for something like that. More hp is not always better. There was a recent poll here where most said 150 - 200 hp is best for a 914. Save your time and money for those guys in the pic above. Or buy a car already converted. For sure you can find one cheap relative to the cost of construction. Why? Filling the trunks with miscellaneous engine junk makes the car less useful, but more expensive. Kind of like an upside-down mortgage. Thinking about it, buying parts - thats fun. Finding time and doing the actual work - PITA and BTDT. Just my opinion.
|
|
|
|
| Kraftwerk |
Feb 21 2011, 09:16 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 195 Joined: 6-September 07 From: Bbbbbrroooklynnn Member No.: 8,085 |
So, I am saving 44 LBS. with my 1.7!!
I am actually quite pleased with the pep of the 1.7..fun! But are you saying a 2.0 conversion requires cutting up the engine tin or bay? |
|
|
|
| Woody |
Feb 21 2011, 09:44 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Sandbox Rabblerouser and head toilet scrubber Group: Members Posts: 3,858 Joined: 28-December 10 From: San Antonio Texas Member No.: 12,530 Region Association: Southwest Region |
2 liter will bolt right in but the tins are different from the 1.7 and 1.8 due to different spark plug angles. Don't know where the extra 44 pounds comes from though.
|
|
|
|
| Rand |
Feb 21 2011, 09:56 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Cross Member Group: Members Posts: 7,409 Joined: 8-February 05 From: OR Member No.: 3,573 Region Association: None |
QUOTE(Kraftwerk @ Feb 21 2011, 07:16 PM) are you saying a 2.0 conversion requires cutting up the engine tin or bay? No. The 2.0 bolts in with no mods. [edit]oops, aside from minor holes in tin for spark plugs[/edit] The LS1/LS2 is an aluminum block Chevy v8 with 300+ more hp than a 2.0 and doesn't weigh more than a Porsche 6. That conversion requires a small notch in the rear trunk wall for the distributor. And a radiator in the front trunk. |
|
|
|
| abnrdo |
Feb 23 2011, 10:28 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 399 Joined: 24-September 04 From: Panama City, FL Member No.: 2,820 Region Association: South East States |
QUOTE(Rand @ Feb 21 2011, 09:56 PM) QUOTE(Kraftwerk @ Feb 21 2011, 07:16 PM) are you saying a 2.0 conversion requires cutting up the engine tin or bay? No. The 2.0 bolts in with no mods. [edit]oops, aside from minor holes in tin for spark plugs[/edit] The LS1/LS2 is an aluminum block Chevy v8 with 300+ more hp than a 2.0 and doesn't weigh more than a Porsche 6. That conversion requires a small notch in the rear trunk wall for the distributor. And a radiator in the front trunk. No notch for the LS1/LS2 only if your using the heavier LT1 motor. Still havent decided. 3.2 conversion is more expensive than a Renegade system. |
|
|
|
| Root_Werks |
Feb 23 2011, 10:31 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Village Idiot Group: Members Posts: 8,510 Joined: 25-May 04 From: About 5NM from Canada Member No.: 2,105 Region Association: Pacific Northwest 
|
Still.....44lbs diff between a 1.7-1.8 and 2.0, that seems like a lot.
|
|
|
|
| McMark |
Feb 23 2011, 10:53 AM
Post
#10
|
|
914 Freak! Group: Retired Admin Posts: 20,179 Joined: 13-March 03 From: Grand Rapids, MI Member No.: 419 Region Association: None |
Especially considering the 2.0 has a slightly lighter crank and slightly lighter rods. Perhaps the stock 2.0 flywheel is lighter? I never noticed a difference, but it could be true. PET doesn't show different part numbers... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif)
I call bogus... |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th December 2024 - 04:57 AM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.