Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> long tube intake, Chrysler
930cabman
post Jan 23 2025, 04:39 PM
Post #1


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,874
Joined: 12-November 20
From: Buffalo
Member No.: 24,877
Region Association: North East States



Looking at this technology from 60+ years ago

https://www.macsmotorcitygarage.com/secrets...-ram-induction/

wondering has anyone gone after another 10% give or take?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Jan 23 2025, 04:49 PM
Post #2


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,565
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I had a Fiero with Caddy V8 many years back. There was an intake from the Alante with long runners that claimed to add hp/tq.

Never did do the conversion so I don't have any real world experience. But if GM was doing it in the 90's, probably some validity to it.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
technicalninja
post Jan 23 2025, 05:17 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,377
Joined: 31-January 23
From: Granbury Texas
Member No.: 27,135
Region Association: Southwest Region



Pretty much ALL of the OEMs went that way...

That is the REASON Tygaboy's Ferrari has the extra butterflys in the intake.

In the 90s I saw a proliferation of variable length intake tracts.

The MOST COMPLEX ones were on the Mazda Rotary engine.

It had a rotating barrel in it and could vary the intake tract incrementally.

Those were exotic as shit!

Most set ups have a long (low speed) and a short position (high speed).


VLIs are less common now but I still see them occasionally.

I believe what happened is the OEMs figured out designing the intake for a specific range (1500-2500rpm is my guess) worked OK across all ranges but created the very best fuel economy without the complexity of the variable BS.

The Lamborghini V10 that is also used in the Audis has a MONSTER complicated intake plenum because of this crap and that intake in the MOST COMMON failure point in that drive train. There are multiple YouTube vids on that intake and its repair.


Edit:

The modular intake for the type 4 I designed has long correctly tapered tubes with the largest radius I could fit into a 914 (improve torque in low to mid-range) to a central plenum with a single electronic T-body.

The "injector mount" section would be super short and the flange in the DCOE pattern so that a guy building a high RPM motor could fit the butterflys closer to the valves that any other option.

super short DCOE throttle bodies are available.

https://www.jenvey.co.uk/throttle-bodies-an...m-vshort-tssxxi
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jd74914
post Jan 24 2025, 09:20 AM
Post #4


Its alive
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,834
Joined: 16-February 04
From: CT
Member No.: 1,659
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(technicalninja @ Jan 23 2025, 06:17 PM) *

Pretty much ALL of the OEMs went that way...

Yep.

But in modern day, you often see more gains (remember-the key is maximizing the area under the efficiency curve) with variable valve timing and valve lift controls. Throttle bodies and long intake runners have high pumping losses associated with them (think drinking through a small straw) and space contraints so the real control point is moving towards the valves. That's why some cars currently only have 2 position throttle bodies (think some BMWs).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
technicalninja
post Jan 24 2025, 11:16 AM
Post #5


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,377
Joined: 31-January 23
From: Granbury Texas
Member No.: 27,135
Region Association: Southwest Region



QUOTE(jd74914 @ Jan 24 2025, 09:20 AM) *

QUOTE(technicalninja @ Jan 23 2025, 06:17 PM) *

Pretty much ALL of the OEMs went that way...

Yep.

But in modern day, you often see more gains (remember-the key is maximizing the area under the efficiency curve) with variable valve timing and valve lift controls. Throttle bodies and long intake runners have high pumping losses associated with them (think drinking through a small straw) and space contraints so the real control point is moving towards the valves. That's why some cars currently only have 2 position throttle bodies (think some BMWs).


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

I don't give a rat's ass about VLIs...

I LOVE VVT, COP, WB02, GDI and all the real modern shit!

The "valve-tronic" BMW horseshit semi works...

Both the lift and the duration on the intake go down to NOTHING at idle. The valves BARELY move.
"Tip in" is DIFFERENT in those. You press the throttle and there is a significant pause before the valves start to open. You have to "lead" the throttle.

I've never tried but I bet it's a BITCH to cut a "tight light" at a drag strip with those.

One AWESOME thing with the BMW that COOL to watch but pretty much useless is the engine will run and idle fine WITHOUT any part of the intake installed.
Bare head and it just works!

Killer thing to win money on!
I've won $200 betting folks "it will run fine without the intake and not bang off the rev limiter."
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ClayPerrine
post Jan 24 2025, 11:32 AM
Post #6


Life's been good to me so far.....
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,061
Joined: 11-September 03
From: Hurst, TX.
Member No.: 1,143
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



Porsche did it with the 993 Varioram. The intake has plumbing to change from long runners to short runners,controlled by the DME.

Won't fit under the 914 decklid though.

User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Root_Werks
post Jan 24 2025, 07:05 PM
Post #7


Village Idiot
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,565
Joined: 25-May 04
From: About 5NM from Canada
Member No.: 2,105
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE(ClayPerrine @ Jan 24 2025, 09:32 AM) *

Porsche did it with the 993 Varioram. The intake has plumbing to change from long runners to short runners,controlled by the DME.

Won't fit under the 914 decklid though.


Was that also employed on 986/996 engines?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ClayPerrine
post Jan 24 2025, 07:50 PM
Post #8


Life's been good to me so far.....
***************

Group: Admin
Posts: 16,061
Joined: 11-September 03
From: Hurst, TX.
Member No.: 1,143
Region Association: NineFourteenerVille



QUOTE(Root_Werks @ Jan 24 2025, 07:05 PM) *

QUOTE(ClayPerrine @ Jan 24 2025, 09:32 AM) *

Porsche did it with the 993 Varioram. The intake has plumbing to change from long runners to short runners,controlled by the DME.

Won't fit under the 914 decklid though.


Was that also employed on 986/996 engines?


I think so. I never really worked on the water cooled flat sixes.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th February 2025 - 07:51 AM