Compression test values for a rebuilt TIV |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Compression test values for a rebuilt TIV |
Dr Evil |
Aug 22 2006, 08:37 AM
Post
#1
|
Send me your transmission! Group: Members Posts: 23,034 Joined: 21-November 03 From: Loveland, OH 45140 Member No.: 1,372 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
I have someone offering a friend a "reacently rebuilt" TIV engine and two things stick out to me that give me pause.
1) The current owner claims that the engine was reacently rebuilt, but does not know what size it is. He "thinks" is a 2.0. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/WTF.gif) 2) Claims 110psi more or less on all cylinders. Sounds low to me for new rings and honed cylinders. I am assuming that they are run in, though. Waht are your thoughts? What values would you expect form a reacent rebuilt? |
bondo |
Aug 22 2006, 08:41 AM
Post
#2
|
Practicing my perpendicular parking Group: Members Posts: 4,277 Joined: 19-April 03 From: Los Osos, CA Member No.: 587 Region Association: Central California |
Low compression bus pistons? You might be able to tell through a sparkplug hole.
|
ptravnic |
Aug 22 2006, 09:03 AM
Post
#3
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,231 Joined: 27-May 03 From: Chicago, IL Member No.: 747 Region Association: None |
Dr - I just spoke w/Rich and said the same thing that 110psi seemed a bit low but the Hayne's manual should have a rating on this.
|
Dr Evil |
Aug 22 2006, 11:08 AM
Post
#4
|
Send me your transmission! Group: Members Posts: 23,034 Joined: 21-November 03 From: Loveland, OH 45140 Member No.: 1,372 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
Probably, I am in class right now so no manual here.
|
mihai914 |
Aug 22 2006, 11:17 AM
Post
#5
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 800 Joined: 2-March 05 From: Montreal, QC Member No.: 3,697 Region Association: None |
Last time I did a compression check on my 2.0 I had readings in the 150-160 range. I still don't know what is inside the engine exactly but it looks mostly like everything is stock. The intake runners are so free of carbon it makes me think that the engine was rebuilt not long before the car sat for 15 years. HTH
|
Dr Evil |
Aug 22 2006, 11:51 AM
Post
#6
|
Send me your transmission! Group: Members Posts: 23,034 Joined: 21-November 03 From: Loveland, OH 45140 Member No.: 1,372 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
Thanks man, those are the numbers I told him. I was pretty sure but wanted a second, third oppinion.
|
bd1308 |
Aug 22 2006, 12:51 PM
Post
#7
|
Sir Post-a-lot Group: Members Posts: 8,020 Joined: 24-January 05 From: Louisville,KY Member No.: 3,501 |
I heard 160 from my bus buddies.
Im thinking its less than new. b |
Aaron Cox |
Aug 22 2006, 01:09 PM
Post
#8
|
Professional Lawn Dart Group: Retired Admin Posts: 24,541 Joined: 1-February 03 From: OC Member No.: 219 Region Association: Southern California |
Last time I did a compression check on my 2.0 I had readings in the 150-160 range. I still don't know what is inside the engine exactly but it looks mostly like everything is stock. The intake runners are so free of carbon it makes me think that the engine was rebuilt not long before the car sat for 15 years. HTH the intake runners would get carbon how? combustion takes place inside the head, and fuel is only intorduced into the runners at the very end (Injector points at the valve) so only air is flowing thru them.... not a source of carbon (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) |
Engman |
Aug 22 2006, 01:09 PM
Post
#9
|
Zoisite Group: Benefactors Posts: 1,349 Joined: 25-March 03 From: New Albany, IN Member No.: 475 |
110 = low
you might look at it - depending on the price. Something donna feel right. M |
nycchef |
Aug 22 2006, 01:25 PM
Post
#10
|
mechanical moron Group: Members Posts: 952 Joined: 28-November 05 From: new york city n.y. Member No.: 5,202 Region Association: None |
allow me to introduce myself. i am the unamed friend of dr. evil who was looking at the wierd type four with low compression or bus pistons or what the hell. i'll let it go. will rebuild my 1.7 but you guys are suffer through it with me. now let's begin. pete do you want to sell your extra 1.8 heads.
|
rjames |
Aug 22 2006, 01:29 PM
Post
#11
|
I'm made of metal Group: Members Posts: 4,158 Joined: 24-July 05 From: Shoreline, WA Member No.: 4,467 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)
QUOTE Last time I did a compression check on my 2.0 I had readings in the 150-160 range. That's where my 2 liter was after the PO did a rebuild. |
SirAndy |
Aug 22 2006, 01:34 PM
Post
#12
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,945 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
Last time I did a compression check on my 2.0 I had readings in the 150-160 range. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) my 2056 had between 155 and 165 ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Andy |
Engman |
Aug 22 2006, 01:36 PM
Post
#13
|
Zoisite Group: Benefactors Posts: 1,349 Joined: 25-March 03 From: New Albany, IN Member No.: 475 |
allow me to introduce myself. i am the unamed friend of dr. evil who was looking at the wierd type four with low compression or bus pistons or what the hell. i'll let it go. will rebuild my 1.7 but you guys are suffer through it with me. now let's begin. pete do you want to sell your extra 1.8 heads. It all depends upon the price. Look at it and see if 1. 2.0 heads 2. condition of case It could be a better candidate for rebuild than the 1.7/1.8. I bought a 2.0 engine that rotated w tranny and exhast for $300 a couple of years ago. Turns out that one head had a piston missing chunks and needed a complete rebuild. But I got the tranny and exhasut - which were woth more than $300. And I am still slowly rebuilding the engine. M |
ptravnic |
Aug 22 2006, 01:39 PM
Post
#14
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,231 Joined: 27-May 03 From: Chicago, IL Member No.: 747 Region Association: None |
Sir Andy - What types of heads are you using on your 2056? 1.8L or 2.0L? Chef - we'll talk later this w'end. Not sure what the heads look like when we take them off. They are coming off for a reason after all... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) -pt |
Dr Evil |
Aug 22 2006, 01:59 PM
Post
#15
|
Send me your transmission! Group: Members Posts: 23,034 Joined: 21-November 03 From: Loveland, OH 45140 Member No.: 1,372 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
What you need to do, Rich, is either rebuild the 1.7 stock (not my first choice) or locate a good core 1.8/2.0 and rebuild it to what you want.
What = a 1911? What = a 2056? I forget which rod, crank, p/c combos go to each. If you get this info you can start to plan your attack. Is Leo keeping his engine? For the record, what the guy wanted for the unverified size, rebuild and compression engine was not worth the parts. |
SirAndy |
Aug 22 2006, 02:07 PM
Post
#16
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,945 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
Sir Andy - What types of heads are you using on your 2056? 1.8L or 2.0L? the engine had 2.0L heads ... (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Andy |
SirAndy |
Aug 22 2006, 02:08 PM
Post
#17
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,945 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
What you need to do, Rich, is either rebuild the 1.7 stock (not my first choice) or locate a good core 1.8/2.0 and rebuild it to what you want. and why not use his 1.7L case to build a 2056 or whatever he wants ??? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Andy |
nycchef |
Aug 22 2006, 02:13 PM
Post
#18
|
mechanical moron Group: Members Posts: 952 Joined: 28-November 05 From: new york city n.y. Member No.: 5,202 Region Association: None |
QUOTE and why not use his 1.7L case to build a 2056 or whatever he wants ??? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Andy andy was under the impression 1.7 heads could'nt be built out to either a 2.0 or 2056. am i wrong again? |
ptravnic |
Aug 22 2006, 02:13 PM
Post
#19
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,231 Joined: 27-May 03 From: Chicago, IL Member No.: 747 Region Association: None |
What = a 1911? What = a 2056? I *think* a 1911 is stock 1.8L crank/rods w/96mm P/C's. I *know* a 2056 is stock 2.0L crank/rods w/96mm P/C's. I forget what mm stroke the crank and length rods are on stock though (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) 2056 is said to be the max to be used w/the slightly modified (dialed in MPS) D-Jet. -pt |
ptravnic |
Aug 22 2006, 02:17 PM
Post
#20
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,231 Joined: 27-May 03 From: Chicago, IL Member No.: 747 Region Association: None |
QUOTE and why not use his 1.7L case to build a 2056 or whatever he wants ??? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) Andy andy was under the impression 1.7 heads could'nt be built out to either a 2.0 or 2056. am i wrong again? Andy was talking about the case. You would need different heads (either 1.8L or 2.0L) then 96mm pistons w/either matching cylinders or get the 1.7L's honed out to match the 96's. You'll see all of this first hand this w'end as my setup is 96mm p/c's, stock 2.0L crank/rods, 1.8L heads all built off what *was* a a1.7L case. The 1.7L case can be used for the other sizes... -pt |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th December 2024 - 02:49 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |