Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Setting cam geometry, Peak cam lift or peak valve lift?
VaccaRabite
post Jul 8 2009, 11:15 AM
Post #1


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,636
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Jake's site is down it seems, so I am going to ask this here.

I am about to set my pushrod geometry, but I am having a brain fart.

Do I use the peak cam lift or the peak valve lift.

I think that it has to be within 5% of peak valve lift, but I am just not sure, and I don't want to mess it up.

Also, does anyone have a copy of Jakes article for setting geometry? I pretty much remember the procedure, but I'd like to re-read it before I continue to make sure I have it right.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DNHunt
post Jul 8 2009, 11:28 AM
Post #2


914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,099
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Member No.: 598



I measured it at the valve. It was easier to set up the dial indicator on the valve spring retainer.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Jul 8 2009, 11:40 AM
Post #3


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,636
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



That is my thinking as well.

Could someone confirm that my methodolgy is correct:

Measure with a dial indicator at 90 degrees to the valve stem using an adjustable pushrod until the max height is within 5% of the total valve lift. Subtract the height of the of the pushrod cap, and cut the pushrod.

Was there a step that I am missing?

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
904svo
post Jul 8 2009, 11:59 AM
Post #4


904SVO
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,124
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Woodstock,Georgia
Member No.: 5,146



Fast answerer,
Set valve lash to zero and zero out dial indicator)
measure total valve lift at spring by turn engine over
ONLY TURN THE ENGINE IN THE DIRECTION THAT IT RUNS!!!!!
divide measure by 2 (half lift)
turn the engine over till dial indicator to that measurement (half cam lift)
Set rocker arm to 90 degrees to the valve stem by adjusting the push rod.
re due this a couple of times to be sure
Thats half lift now.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DNHunt
post Jul 8 2009, 12:07 PM
Post #5


914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,099
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Member No.: 598



Zach

That's not anything like I did.

I ran the shaft of the dial indicator parallel to the valve stem shaft so I could measure total lift of the valve. I then divided that number in half and used the adjustable pushrod to find a length that resulted in the adjuster screw being parallel with the valve stem at half lift. Changing the length of the pushrod would change lift some so it was a trial and error kind of thing.

I also used shims under the rocker assembly to help with how much thread I had for moving the adjuster screws in the rocker arms.

As I understand it the most important issue is lateral forces on the valve stems causing wear of the valve guides. Having the adjuster screw parallel with the valve stem at half open results in the least amount of wear. As I remember, it is better to give up a little lift to have the right orientation at half lift.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
DNHunt
post Jul 8 2009, 12:10 PM
Post #6


914 Wizard? No way. I got too much to learn.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,099
Joined: 21-April 03
From: Gig Harbor, WA
Member No.: 598



Here's a pic



Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Jul 8 2009, 12:19 PM
Post #7


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



Half lift alignment will give your motor a longer life. You should check full lift to ensure that you are in the ballpark, but full lift should be sacrificed to ensure good half lift alignment.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Jul 8 2009, 03:29 PM
Post #8


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,636
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(DNHunt @ Jul 8 2009, 01:07 PM) *

Zach

That's not anything like I did.



Yeah it is. I just suck describing it properly. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) What you described was what I remembered. What I had forgotten was the 1/2 lift step.

I knew there was a step at 1/2 lift, but I could not remember what it was. As soon as I saw your picture, I remembered it - as I remember staring for about 30 minutes at my first valve a year ago trying to determine if it was perfect or not.

As it is, it took longer getting those darned spiral keepers on that KB pistons use. So I am just now ready to start pushrod geo.

Of course, at this point I have just enough time to get a shower and pick my son up from daycare. So, geometry will have to wait for Theo to go to bed for the night.

Zach

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
charliew
post Jul 8 2009, 04:57 PM
Post #9


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,363
Joined: 31-July 07
From: Crawford, TX.
Member No.: 7,958



That is a good picture. I think the adjuster in that picture could be straighter or more inline with the valve stem. Also the rocker could be moved to it's left a little. The idea is to only have the adjuster working across as close to center as possible. If the adjuster is all the way up in the rocker arm the rocker arm needs to be raised to get the adjuster straighter. Close isn't really part of the procedure it needs to be right. Don't get in a hurry there is no rush it isn't easy but once it's right the guides will last a long time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Borderline
post Jul 8 2009, 05:28 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 720
Joined: 8-February 05
From: San Juan Bautista, CA
Member No.: 3,577
Region Association: Northern California



Your rocker arms need to be ground down about 1/16" where the swivel cup of the adjuster gets close. I found that if I turned the adjuster all the way in to where the swivel cup hit the arm and then backed it out about 2 turns was a good starting place. It needs some clearance to allow the swivel cup to swivel when it opens the valve. Also, if you really think about it, to get the adjuster screw inline with the valve at the half lift point, you need to add shims to the rocker arm shafts. My cam is pretty low lift and I needed to add about .080" of shims under the rocker arm mounting blocks. I my opinion, this is more important than the length of the push rod. The higher lift cams will need smaller shims if any at all.

This photo shows the orientation of the rocker arm should be at half-lift. The valve stem should be exactly in line with adjuster screw at half lift. To get there, you have to adjust the pushrod length and the ht of the rocker arm shaft. IMHO


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bam914
post Jul 8 2009, 06:09 PM
Post #11


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 342
Joined: 23-November 03
From: Atlanta, Ga
Member No.: 1,378
Region Association: None



Here is Jake's article on rocker geometry.

http://forums.aircooledtechnology.com/showthread.php?t=25
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Jul 8 2009, 06:50 PM
Post #12


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,636
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(bam914 @ Jul 8 2009, 07:09 PM) *

Here is Jake's article on rocker geometry.

http://forums.aircooledtechnology.com/showthread.php?t=25


Either you or Travis sent it to me today via email when the forums were down. I have it printed... somewhere... but it is better to have it on hand then try to find it buried inthe garage.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jake Raby
post Jul 8 2009, 08:13 PM
Post #13


Engine Surgeon
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 9,398
Joined: 31-August 03
From: Lost
Member No.: 1,095
Region Association: South East States



My site isn't down and hasn't been to my knowledge..

Follow that article... I wrote it while doing the geometry process on one of my engines.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
VaccaRabite
post Jul 9 2009, 12:05 AM
Post #14


En Garde!
**********

Group: Admin
Posts: 13,636
Joined: 15-December 03
From: Dallastown, PA
Member No.: 1,435
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



QUOTE(Jake Raby @ Jul 8 2009, 09:13 PM) *

My site isn't down and hasn't been to my knowledge..

Follow that article... I wrote it while doing the geometry process on one of my engines.


It was down for about an hour or so when I had lunch. At least, I could not reach it then. My bookmarks work now, though.

Got #3 and #4 done. #1 and #2 are prepped for the morning, after I do my class work.

Zach
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th January 2025 - 01:03 AM