RANT: Electric Conversions, Not what you think...... |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
RANT: Electric Conversions, Not what you think...... |
KaptKaos |
Jan 26 2009, 12:24 PM
Post
#1
|
Family Group: Members Posts: 4,009 Joined: 23-April 03 From: Near Wausau Member No.: 607 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
There's a fellow selling a motor in the classifieds. Here's the link:
http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?showtopic=92077 Seems normal enough. I assume, maybe wrongly, that this person is using the car for an electric conversion. I have no issue with people converting their cars to electric motors. However, I am wondering if it is reasonable to ask or inform the people that are looking to do this to please try to use '76 cars? This is particularly important in California, as the smog checks in California aren't required on Pre-76 cars. There are two counter arguments that I can think of and they are: 1) '76 cars are fairly rare, and therefore either more expensive and/or harder to find. 2) The point of an electric conversion is to reduce emissions, so using a car that has higher emissions makes more sense. I am not sure if this is practical/possible/reasonable/feasible, so I figured that I'd ask. Am I out of line here? Please note that I mean no ill will to the seller above. |
So.Cal.914 |
Jan 26 2009, 02:39 PM
Post
#2
|
"...And it has a front trunk too." Group: Members Posts: 6,588 Joined: 15-February 04 From: Low Desert, CA./ Hills of N.J. Member No.: 1,658 Region Association: None |
QUOTE So the premise of using only pre-76 vehicles for electrical modification just doesn't hold water... It does unless some idiot told them it's modified. |
ericread |
Jan 26 2009, 02:50 PM
Post
#3
|
The Viper Blue 914 Group: Members Posts: 2,177 Joined: 7-December 07 From: Irvine, CA (The OC) Member No.: 8,432 Region Association: Southern California |
QUOTE So the premise of using only pre-76 vehicles for electrical modification just doesn't hold water... It does unless some idiot told them it's modified. Sure, you can lie, cheat and steal. It still doesn't make it legal. You could re-badge a 76 as a 75 and get around the legal requirements too (We've all seen the thread where a certain Atlanta reseller offered to sell the required items to do just that). It doesn't make it right and I wouldn't want to have to explain to the police if I got caught... Seemingly, if you were in an accident or some other type of event where a police officer inspected the vehicle and found a V8 where a four-cylinder 2.0L engine were expected, I would assume there would be some splaining to do... I was only assuming that this question was being asked with integrity as to legal requirements. If this thread is based upon the premise that we all misrepresent our vehicles, then the 1976 issue still doesn't hold water. Eric (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif) |
So.Cal.914 |
Jan 26 2009, 04:18 PM
Post
#4
|
"...And it has a front trunk too." Group: Members Posts: 6,588 Joined: 15-February 04 From: Low Desert, CA./ Hills of N.J. Member No.: 1,658 Region Association: None |
QUOTE So the premise of using only pre-76 vehicles for electrical modification just doesn't hold water... It does unless some idiot told them it's modified. Sure, you can lie, cheat and steal. It still doesn't make it legal. You could re-badge a 76 as a 75 and get around the legal requirements too (We've all seen the thread where a certain Atlanta reseller offered to sell the required items to do just that). It doesn't make it right and I wouldn't want to have to explain to the police if I got caught... Seemingly, if you were in an accident or some other type of event where a police officer inspected the vehicle and found a V8 where a four-cylinder 2.0L engine were expected, I would assume there would be some splaining to do... I was only assuming that this question was being asked with integrity as to legal requirements. If this thread is based upon the premise that we all misrepresent our vehicles, then the 1976 issue still doesn't hold water. Eric (IMG:style_emoticons/default/shades.gif) Nothing illegal on your car? Never? No header? Never owned a modified car? Modifing an engine can hardly compare to rebadging a car illegally. Legally as I understand it you can not change any equipment on your street car. Done any of that? If not I am sorry for you, you have missed out on a lot of fun. If so quit acting so "Holier than thou". |
ericread |
Jan 26 2009, 07:10 PM
Post
#5
|
The Viper Blue 914 Group: Members Posts: 2,177 Joined: 7-December 07 From: Irvine, CA (The OC) Member No.: 8,432 Region Association: Southern California |
Nothing illegal on your car? Never? No header? Never owned a modified car? Modifing an engine can hardly compair to rebadging a car illegally. Legally as I understand it you can not change any equipment on your street car. Done any of that? If not I am sorry for you, you have missed out on a lot of fun. If so quit acting so "Holier than thou". "Holier than thou" (IMG:style_emoticons/default/av-943.gif) This, from a guy who wants to ban any modifications to a pre-1976 914 unless it's his modifications! I hope you see how ridiculous that is (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol3.gif) All I am trying to point out is that the premise of the 1976 914 being the only car that should be modified to be an electrical vehicle while any pre-1976 914 should be allowed to be modified with a V8 is a silly premise. And using the California law which allows stock 1975 and older cars to be emission test exempt as a support to your premise is simply bogus. Eric Read (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) |
So.Cal.914 |
Jan 26 2009, 07:32 PM
Post
#6
|
"...And it has a front trunk too." Group: Members Posts: 6,588 Joined: 15-February 04 From: Low Desert, CA./ Hills of N.J. Member No.: 1,658 Region Association: None |
Nothing illegal on your car? Never? No header? Never owned a modified car? Modifing an engine can hardly compair to rebadging a car illegally. Legally as I understand it you can not change any equipment on your street car. Done any of that? If not I am sorry for you, you have missed out on a lot of fun. If so quit acting so "Holier than thou". "Holier than thou" (IMG:style_emoticons/default/av-943.gif) This, from a guy who wants to ban any modifications to a pre-1976 914 unless it's his modifications! I hope you see how ridiculous that is (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol3.gif) All I am trying to point out is that the premise of the 1976 914 being the only car that should be modified to be an electrical vehicle while any pre-1976 914 should be allowed to be modified with a V8 is a silly premise. And using the California law which allows stock 1975 and older cars to be emission test exempt as a support to your premise is simply bogus. Eric Read (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif) Well genius those were not my comments, Kapt Kaos wrote this thread. I just thought you were being an asshole and you have yet to disappoint. There are a lot of people here that do not smog their 914's. And a fair chunk of those people have, in one way or another have modified their cars. The ones that do modify their cars wouldn't touch a 76, it has to be smogged. Which would make the 76 the perfect candidate for an electric conversion. No smog. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th December 2024 - 10:57 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |