Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Little confusion on my part surrounding "M-471", Paging Dr. 914
Lavanaut
post Mar 4 2009, 11:28 AM
Post #1


Hungry Mind : Thirsty Gullet
***

Group: Members
Posts: 916
Joined: 20-June 06
From: Bend, OR
Member No.: 6,265
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I've been wondering about this for a long time and was reminded about it last night as I was flipping through the AA catalog and came across pics of George's blue M-471 GT. It's my understanding that the true factory GT race cars did not have the "M-471" designation, that it was technically the designation for the "GT-look" package that one could order from the factory on a /6...?

I guess at the center of my uncertainty is this: when I see "M-471" I immediately think "not a factory GT", but a factory GT look-a-like...just like the wide body "turbo look" 911s.

Can someone help clear this up for me?

Thanks

edit: forgot to say that adding to the confusion is the verbiage in the AA catalog about the "M-471 GT" and its racing history.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
Lavanaut
post Mar 4 2009, 06:19 PM
Post #2


Hungry Mind : Thirsty Gullet
***

Group: Members
Posts: 916
Joined: 20-June 06
From: Bend, OR
Member No.: 6,265
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Dave, TC, thanks. I get it now, and Wolfgang's comment makes perfect sense.

So what I'm taking away from all of this is, IF the rumors Wolfgang mentioned are true, "M471 GT" would be an appropriate designation for only those cars which Porsche used to meet the GT class homologation requirements. I would think that if one could prove that their car met this stringent definition it would undoubtedly affect the value of their car, and favorably. Otherwise, "M471" as it applies to a 914/6 should be referred to at most as "GT look" (somewhat similar to the wide body, 491 "turbo look" 911s).

But I digress. What do you all think? I'm sure plenty here are likely to say "who the hell cares?", but I'm genuinely curious what those of you who really know and enjoy these types of details think. AKA "I defer to the experts". (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

edit: TC, really enjoyed those pics, thanks for posting 'em
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Gustl
post Mar 5 2009, 03:28 AM
Post #3


914 enthusiast & historian
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,709
Joined: 16-June 04
From: TIROL / Austria
Member No.: 2,212
Region Association: Austria



QUOTE(Lavanaut @ Mar 5 2009, 01:19 AM) *

So what I'm taking away from all of this is, IF the rumors Wolfgang mentioned are true, "M471 GT" would be an appropriate designation for only those cars which Porsche used to meet the GT class homologation requirements. I would think that if one could prove that their car met this stringent definition it would undoubtedly affect the value of their car, and favorably. Otherwise, "M471" as it applies to a 914/6 should be referred to at most as "GT look" (somewhat similar to the wide body, 491 "turbo look" 911s).


QUOTE(smg914 @ Mar 5 2009, 05:49 AM) *

I believe its possible all the 15 1971 M471 cars were initially intended to be racecars but many of them never made it that far. Since they were on the list they can certainly be considered Homologation GT's. Many of these cars were sold by dealers as "Street GT's" and thats accurate too because they did ended up as street cars.



personally, I would say that all Porsche 914-6 with the M-471 option (factory built !!!) belong to the same group
this would also include the factory built M-471 street cars that were built after the homologation process
I'm talking about a couple of MY'72 cars with the factory installed M-471 package (for example the well known car with the highest VIN 914.2.43.0260)

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/bye1.gif) Gustl
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Lavanaut   Little confusion on my part surrounding "M-471"   Mar 4 2009, 11:28 AM
sixnotfour   Factory 84 and up carrera's with turbo look th...   Mar 4 2009, 11:58 AM
SirAndy   914-6GT were ordered as 914-6R or ren. "Ren...   Mar 4 2009, 12:36 PM
carr914   The Factory M-471 cars (George's and smg914...   Mar 4 2009, 12:12 PM
Lavanaut   The Factory M-471 cars (George's and smg914...   Mar 4 2009, 12:40 PM
Lavanaut   Put another way, perhaps more succinctly, I believ...   Mar 4 2009, 12:44 PM
SirAndy   Put another way, perhaps more succinctly, I belie...   Mar 4 2009, 01:03 PM
Gustl   Basically, there were 3 different types: 1. Fact...   Mar 4 2009, 01:46 PM
Gustl   form the factory, you could order 3 different type...   Mar 4 2009, 01:50 PM
sixnotfour   Why on the invoice I posted is it desinated as 914...   Mar 4 2009, 03:07 PM
Gustl   when the factory built the 914-6 race cars, they w...   Mar 4 2009, 03:38 PM
carr914   :agree: Also I believe that Homologation is the ...   Mar 4 2009, 03:45 PM
Lavanaut   This thread started off totally mundane and you al...   Mar 4 2009, 04:39 PM
Gustl   Althought I thought I knew what 'homologation...   Mar 5 2009, 03:21 AM
Lavanaut   By the way, what's driving all this is the epi...   Mar 4 2009, 04:56 PM
davep   The homologation process ratifies (makes legal) th...   Mar 4 2009, 05:01 PM
carr914   Back in the late 60s-early 70s, to race in World E...   Mar 4 2009, 05:18 PM
davep   So the Factory made 25 917s and lined them up for...   Mar 4 2009, 10:32 PM
Lavanaut   Dave, TC, thanks. I get it now, and Wolfgang...   Mar 4 2009, 06:19 PM
Gustl   So what I'm taking away from all of this is, ...   Mar 5 2009, 03:28 AM
9146986   I'm talking about a couple of MY'72 cars...   Mar 5 2009, 08:26 PM
Gustl   There are later VIN's than the '72 #260, ...   Mar 5 2009, 11:23 PM
SirAndy   what other 914-6 do you know with a higher VIN th...   Mar 6 2009, 12:06 AM
carr914   I think it is correct to call the Factory M-471 Ho...   Mar 4 2009, 09:58 PM
smg914   One of my favorite subjects. And thanks to all fo...   Mar 4 2009, 10:49 PM
carr914   So the Factory made 25 917s and lined them up fo...   Mar 5 2009, 09:25 AM
davep   [Questionable - According to Denis Jenkinson book...   Mar 5 2009, 12:01 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
25 User(s) are reading this topic (25 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 7th January 2025 - 11:32 PM