Spoilers, SCCA legal |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Spoilers, SCCA legal |
Randal |
May 22 2011, 09:38 AM
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 4,446 Joined: 29-May 03 From: Los Altos, CA Member No.: 750 |
Down at AAS yesterday. All the modified cars had huge spoilers. I thought 8" was the limit, but it looked more like a foot. Got to figure out what is legal and get one of those puppies on 222. |
PeeGreen 914 |
May 23 2011, 09:20 PM
Post
#2
|
Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol Group: Members Posts: 10,219 Joined: 21-September 06 From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett Member No.: 6,884 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
I know some use big ol airdams with splitters but why not just use an LE style with a splitter? Is it better if it is lower? I know the idea is to keep air out from the underside but wouldn't the benefit of the splitter be more beneficial? That way it would still be able to handle more roads, driveways, trailers...
|
jjackson |
May 24 2011, 05:20 AM
Post
#3
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 219 Joined: 5-October 10 From: maumelle, arkansas Member No.: 12,246 Region Association: None |
I know some use big ol airdams with splitters but why not just use an LE style with a splitter? Is it better if it is lower? I know the idea is to keep air out from the underside but wouldn't the benefit of the splitter be more beneficial? That way it would still be able to handle more roads, driveways, trailers... Air pushes down on splitter front and also creates negative air space under at backside-the further back you go the better.Test in mag did not adjust heights (from ground) of splitters. We went as low as we could-still being able to load-ramp extensions cost me 350. More than we had in the whole splitter,air dam, and hardware.Could have done it with boards but sometimes already look like the Clampetts. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sheeplove.gif) JJackson |
PeeGreen 914 |
May 24 2011, 11:19 AM
Post
#4
|
Just when you think you're done...wait, there is more..lol Group: Members Posts: 10,219 Joined: 21-September 06 From: Seattle, WA... actually Everett Member No.: 6,884 Region Association: Pacific Northwest |
I know some use big ol airdams with splitters but why not just use an LE style with a splitter? Is it better if it is lower? I know the idea is to keep air out from the underside but wouldn't the benefit of the splitter be more beneficial? That way it would still be able to handle more roads, driveways, trailers... Air pushes down on splitter front and also creates negative air space under at backside-the further back you go the better.Test in mag did not adjust heights (from ground) of splitters. We went as low as we could-still being able to load-ramp extensions cost me 350. More than we had in the whole splitter,air dam, and hardware.Could have done it with boards but sometimes already look like the Clampetts. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sheeplove.gif) JJackson I was thinking of taking a sheet of steel, taking it back to the belly pan, and attaching the struts of the splitter to the body of the car while the car rather than the airdam. Thoughts? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/confused24.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th January 2025 - 10:42 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |