 de-acceleration valve, 914 2.0L |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| hookrah |
 Jul 27 2011, 03:01 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie  Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 2-August 10 From: Wa. Member No.: 12,005 Region Association: None  |
Does the 73 2.0 L need the de-accelerator valve to operate correctly? What problems, if any, may occur without it?
|
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Rand |
Jul 27 2011, 03:18 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Cross Member Group: Members Posts: 7,409 Joined: 8-February 05 From: OR Member No.: 3,573 Region Association: None |
No. It allows extra air into the intake on deceleration as an emissions control function. The 70-71 cars didn't even have one.
I've never ran with one and never had any problems, or noticeable differences in running. It eliminates one more thing that can go wrong. Some may argue that it is easier on the MPS diaphragm with one. |
|
|
|
| type47 |
Jul 27 2011, 08:12 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Viermeister Group: Members Posts: 4,254 Joined: 7-August 03 From: Vienna, VA Member No.: 994 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
QUOTE(Rand @ Jul 27 2011, 01:18 PM)  Some may argue that it is easier on the MPS diaphragm with one. I heard/read that too. Interesting that an L-jet also has a decel (and no diaphragm). |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
hookrah de-acceleration valve Jul 27 2011, 03:01 PM
jcd914
Some may argue that it is easier on the MPS diap... Jul 27 2011, 08:58 PM
SirAndy Does the 73 2.0 L need the de-accelerator valve to... Jul 27 2011, 08:54 PM 76-914 I pulled mine because it was leaking. No performan... Jul 27 2011, 09:50 PM |
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 07:23 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.