Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Model Specific Information

914/4: 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 914/6: 70 71 72

> Ebay Phoenix Red 914 Questions
TKO
post May 24 2012, 03:18 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 2
Joined: 23-May 12
From: Coto de Caza, CA
Member No.: 14,473
Region Association: None



Can anyone share with me their thoughts on this 914? Seller says '73 2.0. The car has all black bumpers, no fog lights, etc. Is it possible it was original like this?

Many thanks!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/?cmd=ViewIt...RK%3AMEWAX%3AIT

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
sixerdon
post May 26 2012, 07:52 AM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 466
Joined: 23-May 03
From: Dartmouth, MA
Member No.: 731



Although late to this discussion, my own observations are that it is a 1.7 conversion to a 2.0. This car started as a Standard 1.7 without appearance group or sport group components. The conversion most likely would have taken place back 20 years ago, as the owner wrote, when the car received a repaint. The owner stated, ".... the wheels were changed to the painted / polished Fuchs type on it now." at that time replacing the standard 4-1/2" pressed steel wheel. My interpretation is that they are repro fuchs. It's apparent the 4-1/2" spare wheel was kept. (This is my only contention where I disagree with Tom's assessment of wheel type availability. The 4-1/2" wheel size is clearly noted in the sales brochure posted for MY '73 "standard models with the 5-1/2" pressed steel wheels as optional with the appearance group. The real fuchs was standard on the 2.0, optional on 1.7 at the time this car was built. The "star mag type" wheel was introduced for the MY '74 models as the new standard size replacing the two pressed steel wheels.) The owner further stated that, " The carpet is a newer loop..." which would have replaced the Standard felt carpet.

In any event, it seems the bidding continues to increase as of this writing despite these opinions. Only the new owner will know whether or not he/she is purchasing what they think is a REAL 2.0. The owner admitted he hasn't been around 914's for very long and was simply stating what the PO told him. The buyer is the one needing an education, IMHO.

BTW. Use of the word "unknowledgeable" is appropriate IMHO as used by both Pat & Tom with the alternate being fraudulent.

Don
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tom_T
post May 26 2012, 12:10 PM
Post #3


TMI....
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,318
Joined: 19-March 09
From: Orange, CA
Member No.: 10,181
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(sixerdon @ May 26 2012, 06:52 AM) *

Although late to this discussion, my own observations are that it is a 1.7 conversion to a 2.0. This car started as a Standard 1.7 without appearance group or sport group components. The conversion most likely would have taken place back 20 years ago, as the owner wrote, when the car received a repaint. The owner stated, ".... the wheels were changed to the painted / polished Fuchs type on it now." at that time replacing the standard 4-1/2" pressed steel wheel. My interpretation is that they are repro fuchs. It's apparent the 4-1/2" spare wheel was kept. (This is my only contention where I disagree with Tom's assessment of wheel type availability. The 4-1/2" wheel size is clearly noted in the sales brochure posted for MY '73 "standard models with the 5-1/2" pressed steel wheels as optional with the appearance group. The real fuchs was standard on the 2.0, optional on 1.7 at the time this car was built. The "star mag type" wheel was introduced for the MY '74 models as the new standard size replacing the two pressed steel wheels.) The owner further stated that, " The carpet is a newer loop..." which would have replaced the Standard felt carpet.

In any event, it seems the bidding continues to increase as of this writing despite these opinions. Only the new owner will know whether or not he/she is purchasing what they think is a REAL 2.0. The owner admitted he hasn't been around 914's for very long and was simply stating what the PO told him. The buyer is the one needing an education, IMHO.

BTW. Use of the word "unknowledgeable" is appropriate IMHO as used by both Pat & Tom with the alternate being fraudulent.

Don


I see that the 4.5 is on the 1.7 Specs Don. Thanx!

However, my 73 2.0 did have it's Fuchs pulled off by the dealer when new, & replaced by 4 Rivieras & 1 5.5" star "mag style" steelie spare (so they got 5 "free" Fuchs to resell at 100% profit). It was first sold on 11/9/72, so the mag style steeies were definitely available in the 73 MY, even if not the OE on the 1.7's.

Cheers! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
Tom
///////
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
TKO   Ebay Phoenix Red 914 Questions   May 24 2012, 03:18 PM
Tom_T   It's actually a 72 MY 914/4 1.7 originally - a...   May 24 2012, 03:30 PM
porbmw   I'm not getting this. The door jamb complianc...   May 24 2012, 04:34 PM
Pat Garvey   Well, well, well. This car is a true paradox, tho...   May 24 2012, 05:25 PM
Cracker   "I think the seller is just plain unknowled...   May 24 2012, 08:26 PM
1970 Neun vierzehn   [quote name='Pat Garvey' post='1681429' date='May...   May 24 2012, 09:58 PM
Pat Garvey   "I think the seller is just plain unknowle...   May 25 2012, 05:01 PM
Cracker   First, I really am dissapointed that you went to ...   May 25 2012, 05:18 PM
Pat Garvey   First, I really am dissapointed that you went to...   May 25 2012, 05:41 PM
eric9144   Hmmm <_< Like Pat said a bit of a paradox...   May 24 2012, 05:34 PM
Pat Garvey   Sent some questions to the seller. Let's see ...   May 24 2012, 07:02 PM
Tom_T   TKO - In short - now that the seller has pix of t...   May 25 2012, 11:11 AM
Cracker   Cracker - it's not that we're trying to b...   May 25 2012, 12:45 PM
SirAndy   Pat's remarks are not chided properly by Andy ...   May 25 2012, 01:09 PM
Cracker   Pat's remarks are not chided properly by Andy...   May 25 2012, 01:22 PM
Sarastro   Excellent analysis Tom, I really enjoyed reading y...   May 25 2012, 02:08 PM
SirAndy   C'mon Andy...my remarks elicit your response b...   May 25 2012, 02:39 PM
Tom_T   [quote name='Tom_T' post='1681847' date='May 25 2...   May 26 2012, 12:05 PM
Pat Garvey   In short - Nice research Tom, as usual. Pat   May 25 2012, 06:50 PM
Tom_T   FYI - I just posted the following to the evil-bay ...   May 25 2012, 11:24 AM
TKO   Thank you Tom T. for the great observations and im...   May 25 2012, 04:22 PM
Qarl   Douche Douche baby! Cracker... I've read ...   May 25 2012, 05:53 PM
jsayre914   I clicked on the link to ebay and WOW there are 2...   May 25 2012, 06:06 PM
Tom_T   I clicked on the link to ebay and WOW there are ...   May 26 2012, 12:20 PM
Cracker   Blah, blah, blah...making noise Pat to shift the f...   May 25 2012, 07:07 PM
Pat Garvey   Blah, blah, blah...making noise Pat to shift the ...   May 26 2012, 08:43 PM
dsmeyer   Nice job Tom... Another item for your extensive l...   May 25 2012, 08:55 PM
Tom_T   Nice job Tom... Another item for your extensive ...   May 26 2012, 12:15 PM
sixerdon   Although late to this discussion, my own observati...   May 26 2012, 07:52 AM
Tom_T   Although late to this discussion, my own observat...   May 26 2012, 12:10 PM
mepstein   Assuming the ebay bids are real...   May 26 2012, 09:03 AM
Pat Garvey   I've reopened this topic because it was necess...   May 29 2012, 06:23 PM
Tom_T   I've reopened this topic because it was neces...   May 29 2012, 06:52 PM
Qarl   That's a good thing. We all have things to co...   May 29 2012, 06:39 PM
Cracker   All this lovey-dovey stuff is making me :barf:   May 29 2012, 08:35 PM
Bleyseng   To me, its a obvious conversion of a 1.7 to a 2.0L...   Jun 2 2012, 04:00 PM
Pat Garvey   To me, its a obvious conversion of a 1.7 to a 2.0...   Jun 3 2012, 04:00 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd June 2024 - 08:46 PM