Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Proportioning valve needed for LS1 conversion?
mittelmotor
post Jul 24 2012, 12:32 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 21-May 12
From: SoCal
Member No.: 14,464
Region Association: None



Renegade Hybrids suggests doing away with the rear proportioning valve for their LS1 V-8 conversion, and replacing it with a T fitting. I know in stock configuration this could increase the likelihood of rear lockup. My car has the stock MC, stock 914-4 rear brakes and 911 "M" calipers & vented rotors up front. It'll also have a bit of tire stagger, 205s in front and 225s in rear. Will a T fitting be OK with this setup? Thanks!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
mittelmotor
post Aug 12 2012, 05:23 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 334
Joined: 21-May 12
From: SoCal
Member No.: 14,464
Region Association: None



Thanks for your input, Terry, but I have to disagree with your assessment of Renegade. Steve and Scott have been extremely helpful, returning phone calls and emails quickly, and providing additional photos when asked.

The quality of the parts I've received is absolutely top-notch...flawless welds on the radiator, a wonderful billet-machined bracket for the alternator, etc., etc. They may not make their stuff in-house, but they apparently pick excellent suppliers. Their cooling system comes highly recommended by many, and seems to be well thought out.

I think with my brake/tire setup, I'll be fine without the valve. That said, I'm not throwing it away either. I plan on doing some heavy straight-line and trail-brake tests to see how the car behaves in a lock-up or near lock-up situation.

--Doug
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stewteral
post Aug 15 2012, 09:38 PM
Post #3


Old Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 384
Joined: 4-December 07
From: Camarillo, CA
Member No.: 8,424
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(mittelmotor @ Aug 12 2012, 04:23 PM) *

Thanks for your input, Terry, but I have to disagree with your assessment of Renegade. Steve and Scott have been extremely helpful, returning phone calls and emails quickly, and providing additional photos when asked.

The quality of the parts I've received is absolutely top-notch...flawless welds on the radiator, a wonderful billet-machined bracket for the alternator, etc., etc. They may not make their stuff in-house, but they apparently pick excellent suppliers. Their cooling system comes highly recommended by many, and seems to be well thought out.

I think with my brake/tire setup, I'll be fine without the valve. That said, I'm not throwing it away either. I plan on doing some heavy straight-line and trail-brake tests to see how the car behaves in a lock-up or near lock-up situation.

--Doug


OK Doug,

I can only try to share my experience with Renegade. I hope your engine mount crossbar doesn't still bow in the middle from being under-designed as they did in the past.

Renegade aside, my info on braking was real. So I invite you to try some SERIOUS late braking and trail-braking into a 2nd or 3rd gear corner on a REAL race track (where you are pushing to front-wheel lock-up) and see what happens. Of course, wimp-braking will get you by, but you will also be passed by a number of real drivers.

It's all you choice.

Best of luck,
Terry
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th June 2024 - 05:40 AM