![]() |
|
Thursday, 13 March 2025 |
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
stugray |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,825 Joined: 17-September 09 From: Longmont, CO Member No.: 10,819 Region Association: None ![]() |
Ok, so I bought the deck height measurement tools from the group buy.
But I cannot figure out exactly how the OP intended to use the middle plate. I have been trying to measure my deck height accurately for weeks now and I either am not doing it right, or I have a problem. I have the EMW AA cylinders & KB Hypereutectic pistons - brand new. I am measuring with no shims under the cyls. I bolt the holddown tool on two cyls with pistons installed and torque to spec (24 ft-lbs) I set TDC on the cyl I am about to measure with a mag base & dial indicator using the middle of the piston as reference. I then set a VERY straight edge across both cylinders and clamp it down. I then measure the top of the cylinder mating surface down to the very edge of the piston using a dial indicator/depth gauge. I repeat the measurement at least 5 times and average the results. I am getting measurements that vary from .022 to .032 and they can vary by up to .0067 across a single piston (front to rear). (IMG:style_emoticons/default/WTF.gif) (measurements at the same spot are repeateable within less than .001) When we are trying to get these deck heights to match to within a few thousandths, I cannot see how that can be done when the piston can be off by more than 5 thousandths front to rear. Does this mean I have bent rods or misaligned wrist pin bushings? I had the entire rotating assembly balanced, so I would hope they would have caught something bent. I guess my next steps will be to shuffle the pistons around and see if the measurements follow the pistons. If they dont, I might need to move rods. Can all 4 rods be removed & replaced without splitting the case again? Stu |
![]() ![]() |
stugray |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,825 Joined: 17-September 09 From: Longmont, CO Member No.: 10,819 Region Association: None ![]() |
ok, latest update.
I took all four rods off without splitting the case. They all measured the same from rod journal bearing surface to wrist pin bearing surface to within 0.001. So I measured the gap from the top of the crank-rod journal to the registers while the crank was at TDC. I zeroed the depth gauge using yeahmag's plate on cyl #1 and read: Cyl #2 - 0.000 Cyl #3 - +0.002 Cyl #4 - +0.007 So there is my ~8 thousandths on the deck height on cyl #4. Now how do I know if it is the crank or the case's fault? I guess it is time to send them both in for checks. Who should i contact for a deck height check that could also fix my crank (if that is the problem)? Stu |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th March 2025 - 04:36 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |