 3.2 Conversion Flywheel/Presure Plate, Kennedy Pressure plate to mate 901 to 3.2 |
|
|
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
|
| earossi |
 Sep 17 2014, 07:10 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 210 Joined: 8-December 11 From: Chicago, Il Member No.: 13,878 Region Association: Upper MidWest  |
I've spent some time attempting to research my question and cannot find any information in the forum's archives; so,thought that I would ask my question on this forum.
I am doing a conversion project to install a 1987 3.2 motor into my 914. I plan on using the 901 transmission. In the process of researching parts to make this installation, I came upon a Kennedy pressure plate with a 225mm clutch disc that was essentially new. The owner stated that the part is what I needed to make the conversion mentioned above. So, I purchased the pressure plate and disc from him. When the hardware arrived, I found that the pressure plate included a ring gear for the starter. My confusion is in noting that the flywheel currently mounted to my 3.2 motor has an integral ring gear. So, do I have an incorrect flywheel or an incorrect pressure plate? The Kennedy design included a removable ring gear for the pressure plate. So, do I simply mount the pressure plate to the 3.2 flywheel WITHOUT the ring gear? Or, is the Kennedy ring gear positioned to mate up with the location of the starter motor on the 901 tranny? Sorry for the confusion, but I am just trying to understand what is required. Incidentally, the 225mm Kennedy clutch disc appears to be a perfect fit to the 3.2 flywheel installed on the motor. |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| DBCooper |
Sep 17 2014, 08:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
14's in the 13's with ATTITUDE Group: Members Posts: 3,079 Joined: 25-August 04 From: Dazed and Confused Member No.: 2,618 Region Association: Northern California |
Call KEP.
|
|
|
|
| earossi |
Sep 17 2014, 08:55 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 210 Joined: 8-December 11 From: Chicago, Il Member No.: 13,878 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
QUOTE(DBCooper @ Sep 17 2014, 09:53 PM)  Call KEP. Great Idea! |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
earossi 3.2 Conversion Flywheel/Presure Plate Sep 17 2014, 07:10 PM
wndsnd If it is same as the 2.7 I am doing, I had to get ... Sep 17 2014, 07:27 PM wndsnd Yeah you have a 9 bolt crank. Sep 17 2014, 07:44 PM earossi OK. Yes, the 3.2 has a 9 bolt flywheel. The flyw... Sep 17 2014, 08:39 PM
worn
OK. Yes, the 3.2 has a 9 bolt flywheel. The fly... Sep 17 2014, 08:50 PM
worn
So, my question becomes one of knowing if the st... Sep 17 2014, 08:52 PM earossi
So, my question becomes one of knowing if the s... Sep 17 2014, 09:06 PM Mark Henry :ttiwwp:
I need to see what you have...
My 3.0 ... Sep 17 2014, 08:53 PM Steve Call KEP. Back in 2000 when I did mine, they offe... Sep 17 2014, 09:50 PM Mike D. The sensor ring on the flywheel has square teeth, ... Sep 17 2014, 10:59 PM larryM I posted pics & part numbers a long time ago -... Sep 18 2014, 11:49 AM |
5 User(s) are reading this topic (5 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th December 2024 - 04:32 PM |
Invision Power Board
v9.1.4 © 2024 IPS, Inc.