1.7 rockers with swivel foot?, Opinions needed from those who have done the modification... |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
1.7 rockers with swivel foot?, Opinions needed from those who have done the modification... |
mtndawg |
Feb 5 2017, 12:28 PM
Post
#1
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 414 Joined: 26-January 09 From: Granite Bay, Ca Member No.: 9,985 Region Association: None |
I currently have pauter rockers on my 2.0 L motor that I acquired. I'm considering going back to stock rockers or doing the 1.7 modification to the swivel foot. What is the benefit of using the 1.7?
|
RenoRoger |
Feb 5 2017, 03:10 PM
Post
#2
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 95 Joined: 11-November 10 From: Reno, NV Member No.: 12,370 Region Association: Northern California |
I currently have pauter rockers on my 2.0 L motor that I acquired. I'm considering going back to stock rockers or doing the 1.7 modification to the swivel foot. What is the benefit of using the 1.7? I bought a VW Beetle engine with swivel foot rockers. Two of them failed within 5.000 miles. They were junk. I went back to originals. |
Montreal914 |
Feb 5 2017, 03:30 PM
Post
#3
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,725 Joined: 8-August 10 From: Claremont, CA Member No.: 12,023 Region Association: Southern California |
I currently have pauter rockers on my 2.0 L motor that I acquired. I'm considering going back to stock rockers or doing the 1.7 modification to the swivel foot. What is the benefit of using the 1.7? I bought a VW Beetle engine with swivel foot rockers. Two of them failed within 5.000 miles. They were junk. I went back to originals. That is because they were cheap chinese parts. Use original 911 swivel. |
Mark Henry |
Feb 5 2017, 05:25 PM
Post
#4
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
The reason for using them is they are needed on Stainless Steel valves, because the stem face is so soft the stock adjuster will mushroom the the valve stem/face.
Even a stockish engine with a carb cam or SS valves should have them. They are not needed on a bone stock engine with factory valves. I currently have pauter rockers on my 2.0 L motor that I acquired. I'm considering going back to stock rockers or doing the 1.7 modification to the swivel foot. What is the benefit of using the 1.7? I bought a VW Beetle engine with swivel foot rockers. Two of them failed within 5.000 miles. They were junk. I went back to originals. That is because they were cheap chinese parts. Use original 911 swivel. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) The china swivel feet are junk, so are the ford copy swivel ball (used on T1's) adjusters. Gene Berg used to have good swivel foot copies, but I don't know if they sell them any more. The best are the real 911 adjusters, but new they are not cheap for a set of 8. I don't care for the Paulter rockers, in my book they have very poorly designed oiling. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th December 2024 - 11:42 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |