Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 1.7 rockers with swivel foot?, Opinions needed from those who have done the modification...
mtndawg
post Feb 5 2017, 12:28 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 414
Joined: 26-January 09
From: Granite Bay, Ca
Member No.: 9,985
Region Association: None



I currently have pauter rockers on my 2.0 L motor that I acquired. I'm considering going back to stock rockers or doing the 1.7 modification to the swivel foot. What is the benefit of using the 1.7?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
RenoRoger
post Feb 5 2017, 03:10 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 11-November 10
From: Reno, NV
Member No.: 12,370
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(mtndawg @ Feb 5 2017, 10:28 AM) *

I currently have pauter rockers on my 2.0 L motor that I acquired. I'm considering going back to stock rockers or doing the 1.7 modification to the swivel foot. What is the benefit of using the 1.7?


I bought a VW Beetle engine with swivel foot rockers. Two of them failed within 5.000 miles. They were junk. I went back to originals.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Montreal914
post Feb 5 2017, 03:30 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,725
Joined: 8-August 10
From: Claremont, CA
Member No.: 12,023
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(RenoRoger @ Feb 5 2017, 01:10 PM) *

QUOTE(mtndawg @ Feb 5 2017, 10:28 AM) *

I currently have pauter rockers on my 2.0 L motor that I acquired. I'm considering going back to stock rockers or doing the 1.7 modification to the swivel foot. What is the benefit of using the 1.7?


I bought a VW Beetle engine with swivel foot rockers. Two of them failed within 5.000 miles. They were junk. I went back to originals.


That is because they were cheap chinese parts. Use original 911 swivel.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Feb 5 2017, 05:25 PM
Post #4


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



The reason for using them is they are needed on Stainless Steel valves, because the stem face is so soft the stock adjuster will mushroom the the valve stem/face.
Even a stockish engine with a carb cam or SS valves should have them.
They are not needed on a bone stock engine with factory valves.

QUOTE(Montreal914 @ Feb 5 2017, 04:30 PM) *

QUOTE(RenoRoger @ Feb 5 2017, 01:10 PM) *

QUOTE(mtndawg @ Feb 5 2017, 10:28 AM) *

I currently have pauter rockers on my 2.0 L motor that I acquired. I'm considering going back to stock rockers or doing the 1.7 modification to the swivel foot. What is the benefit of using the 1.7?


I bought a VW Beetle engine with swivel foot rockers. Two of them failed within 5.000 miles. They were junk. I went back to originals.


That is because they were cheap chinese parts. Use original 911 swivel.


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) The china swivel feet are junk, so are the ford copy swivel ball (used on T1's) adjusters.

Gene Berg used to have good swivel foot copies, but I don't know if they sell them any more.
The best are the real 911 adjusters, but new they are not cheap for a set of 8.

I don't care for the Paulter rockers, in my book they have very poorly designed oiling.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th December 2024 - 11:42 AM