![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
jeffdon |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,094 Joined: 24-October 06 From: oakland, ca Member No.: 7,087 Region Association: None ![]() |
I have been plagued by a series of issues over the last few years with getting my T4 running well. Some of it due to my screw ups, some just bad luck.
I keep thinking how nice it would be to have an engine that just starts and runs, and has more power. Subie maybe. But I sure like the couple of Honda V6 conversions I have seen. Anyone here that has done a conversion and regretted it? |
![]() ![]() |
McMark |
![]()
Post
#2
|
914 Freak! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Retired Admin Posts: 20,179 Joined: 13-March 03 From: Grand Rapids, MI Member No.: 419 Region Association: None ![]() |
A) Don't waste your money on Biral or Aluminum cylinders. A 2056 should run plenty cool without the expense.
B) I can do carb rebuilds, but I do a bunch to them and check everything, not just install gasket kits. So it's pricey and you may want to check around. C) Stock valves are fine for a 2056. D) I feel the Webcam 494 is a little aggressive for a street car. Sure it'll make more power, but 28 degrees of overlap will make tuning more difficult. Bigger HP numbers are usually all gained at the top end, and at the expense of low RPM performance. Smaller cams and stock valves increase port velocity at lower RPM and increase low end torque and drivability. I would pull back to a Webcam 86. It looks 'weaker' on paper and you'll probably notice a drop off in 4000+ rpm performance, but the increase in low end would make me happy if it were my car. |
jeffdon |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,094 Joined: 24-October 06 From: oakland, ca Member No.: 7,087 Region Association: None ![]() |
A) Don't waste your money on Biral or Aluminum cylinders. A 2056 should run plenty cool without the expense. B) I can do carb rebuilds, but I do a bunch to them and check everything, not just install gasket kits. So it's pricey and you may want to check around. C) Stock valves are fine for a 2056. D) I feel the Webcam 494 is a little aggressive for a street car. Sure it'll make more power, but 28 degrees of overlap will make tuning more difficult. Bigger HP numbers are usually all gained at the top end, and at the expense of low RPM performance. Smaller cams and stock valves increase port velocity at lower RPM and increase low end torque and drivability. I would pull back to a Webcam 86. It looks 'weaker' on paper and you'll probably notice a drop off in 4000+ rpm performance, but the increase in low end would make me happy if it were my car. Trying to avoid splitting the case. That said...if I do, anything else "while I'm in there?" |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th March 2025 - 12:47 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |