Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> compression numbers, how bad are these
mobymutt
post Oct 8 2017, 06:46 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 553
Joined: 16-December 13
From: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 16,770
Region Association: Canada



Just did a compression check, here's what I measured:

108, 120, 96, 85

I've got a stock 1.8L, but would like to build a 1911 or 2056 in the relatively near future. Hopefully I'll be ok for another year or so with the current setup.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
mobymutt
post Oct 8 2017, 08:31 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 553
Joined: 16-December 13
From: Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 16,770
Region Association: Canada



Full disclosure: I did just have the engine apart, but (for a number of reasons) I didn't replace the pistons, cylinders or rings.

There was actually a pretty big 'pocket' in one of the cylinder walls (looked like a casting void), so having at least one cylinder with low compression doesn't surprise me.

Is there an actual spec for what the compression numbers should be on a good engine?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
porschetub
post Oct 8 2017, 01:53 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,756
Joined: 25-July 15
From: New Zealand
Member No.: 18,995
Region Association: None



QUOTE(mobymutt @ Oct 9 2017, 03:31 AM) *

Full disclosure: I did just have the engine apart, but (for a number of reasons) I didn't replace the pistons, cylinders or rings.

There was actually a pretty big 'pocket' in one of the cylinder walls (looked like a casting void), so having at least one cylinder with low compression doesn't surprise me.

Is there an actual spec for what the compression numbers should be on a good engine?


Did you remove the pistons from the barrels and refit the old rings ?.
I always do the compression test as much as 3 times,surprizingly you can get a fair amount of difference,on the 3rd test put a little engine oil down the plug holes if you see a noticeable increase if your rings likely bad.
It really pays to check/reset the valve clearances (cold engine) first ,can make a real difference,also make sure your engine is up to normal running temp when testing.
I've never done a leak down test but it sure seems to be the best check to do.
Compression pressure depends on your compression ratio ,you could have dished low compression ,flat top,or raised top high compression pistons,deck height could have been changed if the heads have been flycut,these are all factors to take into account.
I would say 120 - 150psi would be a healthy engine.
Good luck.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th December 2024 - 12:18 AM