2056 Timing, Looking for Analysis Of New Timing Values |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
2056 Timing, Looking for Analysis Of New Timing Values |
Mblizzard |
Nov 16 2017, 02:03 PM
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,033 Joined: 28-January 13 From: Knoxville Tn Member No.: 15,438 Region Association: South East States |
I have converted my 2.0 to a 2056 and added Micro Squirt fuel injection.
Ever since I did the 2056 conversion I have seen higher than norm cylinder head temperatures. In fact I cracked a set of heads from getting them too hot. I played around with the timing with in the suggested 2.0 limits of around 27 degrees. but was really never able to influence the CHTs that much with changes in the timing. Adding more fuel at the right times with the Micro Squirt certainly allowed me to control the CHT much better but I always felt it was still getting too high. Then I ran across this. This is certainly a lot more advance than I ever added to the engine. So based on that I revised my timing table to: Just love how easy it is to make changes with Micro Squirt. So I am looking to see what the thoughts are on 35 degrees of advance and what impacts it may have on CHT. I am going to load this and test tomorrow. |
Mark Henry |
Nov 24 2017, 03:35 PM
Post
#2
|
that's what I do! Group: Members Posts: 20,065 Joined: 27-December 02 From: Port Hope, Ontario Member No.: 26 Region Association: Canada |
I got to admit looking at those tables is so confusing, the main reason I've never embraced MS or other data overload systems.
It's a fricken timing curve, not rocket science! My SDS has one value per 250 rpm, that's it. Same could be said about a mechanical dizzy, sure springs but it's a simple curve. I agree with Jake and Mark, idle too low I run 10* and 30*+ is too much advance on a T4, I run 28*. If anything I'd consider retarding the timing a bit as I approached 6000 rpm. One of my tricks when tuning is I have a highway close by that has a long (10km) steady uphill grade and it's divided by a concrete barrier. When in the passing lane you are about 24" from the barrier and the sound bounces so you can really hear the engine mechanicly. I've tested 1.8, 2.0, 2056, 2270, and my 2600 T4's any time I push it to 30* I can hear the ping. I can also see head temps going up. Ping is about the equivalent of hitting your piston top with a ball-peen hammer. Sooner or later it will kill your engine. The chart above "Ideal 2056 Adavance Curve" that might work on a WC engine but I'd never consider it on an aircooled T4. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th November 2024 - 09:41 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |