Not worth the $$$ .. ?, Building up the T4 VS the extra $$$ & work for a 6cyl |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Not worth the $$$ .. ?, Building up the T4 VS the extra $$$ & work for a 6cyl |
Beakster |
Aug 8 2018, 10:04 AM
Post
#1
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 121 Joined: 13-August 15 From: Calgary,AB Canada Member No.: 19,055 Region Association: None |
There seems to be an ongoing debate about putting the money into building up a T4 4cyl engine to investing the extra time $$$ and the extra work involved in putting in a 6cyl in a 914 .. These 914's need enough basic restoring just to keep them road worthy then looking to add extra cost in non stock or easy engine swaps .. Every swap that isn't a type 4 seems to be a lot of extra $$$ .... Time....and Big Time WORK .. There are NO easy and affordable swaps on these cars .. (That I have ran into SO FAR ) It is getting harder and More expensive to track down good used parts for 914s especially the 2.0 heads .. Like a member had told me before I got the car Quote : There is no way you can budget in fixing up a 914 you will be always be battling $$$ VS Being satisfied ...
So it's (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png) I guess ... LOL |
mepstein |
Aug 8 2018, 01:22 PM
Post
#2
|
914-6 GT in waiting Group: Members Posts: 19,587 Joined: 19-September 09 From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE Member No.: 10,825 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
Raby charges ~ $20K for one of his engines. Just buy the car and drop in a 3.2. Then you have something.
I wonder if that “912” has a 901 trans or they left in the 915. |
ClayPerrine |
Aug 8 2018, 01:31 PM
Post
#3
|
Life's been good to me so far..... Group: Admin Posts: 15,896 Joined: 11-September 03 From: Hurst, TX. Member No.: 1,143 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille |
I wonder if that “912” has a 901 trans or they left in the 915. All 911/912e cars had a 915 trans starting 1972. The 912E has a bastardized 915 that will hook to the 215MM clutch used on the 914 2.0 motor. Different input shaft and throwout bearing arm. The rest is the same as any other 915. And it still shifts like (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stromberg.gif) |
nditiz1 |
Aug 8 2018, 02:42 PM
Post
#4
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,202 Joined: 26-May 15 From: Mount Airy, Maryland Member No.: 18,763 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
I wonder if that “912” has a 901 trans or they left in the 915. All 911/912e cars had a 915 trans starting 1972. The 912E has a bastardized 915 that will hook to the 215MM clutch used on the 914 2.0 motor. Different input shaft and throwout bearing arm. The rest is the same as any other 915. And it still shifts like (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stromberg.gif) Are you saying the 915 shifts like (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stromberg.gif) or the 901? |
ClayPerrine |
Aug 8 2018, 03:50 PM
Post
#5
|
Life's been good to me so far..... Group: Admin Posts: 15,896 Joined: 11-September 03 From: Hurst, TX. Member No.: 1,143 Region Association: NineFourteenerVille |
I wonder if that “912” has a 901 trans or they left in the 915. All 911/912e cars had a 915 trans starting 1972. The 912E has a bastardized 915 that will hook to the 215MM clutch used on the 914 2.0 motor. Different input shaft and throwout bearing arm. The rest is the same as any other 915. And it still shifts like (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stromberg.gif) Are you saying the 915 shifts like (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stromberg.gif) or the 901? The 901 shifts fine. But it can't handle the horsepower of a big motor. The 915 handles the horsepower better, but it shifts terrible. I hate driving a car with one. The G-50 is much better, but you can't flip the differential on them so they will work in a 914. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif) |
phillstek |
Aug 8 2018, 04:24 PM
Post
#6
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 350 Joined: 19-May 10 From: Byron Bay, Australia Member No.: 11,741 Region Association: None |
I wonder if that “912” has a 901 trans or they left in the 915. All 911/912e cars had a 915 trans starting 1972. The 912E has a bastardized 915 that will hook to the 215MM clutch used on the 914 2.0 motor. Different input shaft and throwout bearing arm. The rest is the same as any other 915. And it still shifts like (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stromberg.gif) Are you saying the 915 shifts like (IMG:style_emoticons/default/stromberg.gif) or the 901? The 901 shifts fine. But it can't handle the horsepower of a big motor. The 915 handles the horsepower better, but it shifts terrible. I hate driving a car with one. The G-50 is much better, but you can't flip the differential on them so they will work in a 914. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif) Converting my car to a 915 has been one the upgrades that has made driving my car such a pleasure. The difference is chalk and cheese. Sure it requires a firm hand sometimes and getting 1st is a little stubborn but always downshifting through 2nd when coming to a stop solves that. The 901 linkage was vague and the dog leg first gear made it a chore in traffic. The only issue with the 915 for me is the 4-5 shift when really driving it hard, it feels like the linkage is binding a bit. I put this down to the long rod flexing at speed. Knowing that the transmission can handle the hp and having the right ratios is a big plus. The 915 is not so good with small displacement 6s, had mine hooked up to my 2.2 and the ratios sucked. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 12th November 2024 - 04:22 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |