Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> New 914 Driver - Clutch Feel
jclanin
post Nov 7 2019, 04:05 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 7-November 19
From: Atlanta
Member No.: 23,626
Region Association: South East States



Hi all,

I'm currently in the market for a 914. I've driven a few '75 2.0 cars (although it's been quite a while) and a '74 1.8 just today.

The '74 is a very well sorted car with a recent engine rebuild and a new clutch (reputable shop).

Engine sounds great and pulls strong (for a 914 1.8:). My question is about the clutch feel. The clutch is very light compared to my '87 911 3.2 which is not surprising. But starting off in 1st is a bit odd. It just seems like there's not much 'bite' to the clutch engagement point thus I feel like have have to keep the gas pedal down a good bit to confidently 'launch' the car. All other shifts seem fine. It's just starting off in 1st.

I realize there could be MANY factors to this 'feel' - but I'm really just here to find out if that 1st gear / clutch engagement is normal in these cars. I just don't have enough experience to tell.

I'll post many more details about the car if I go further with the sale.

thanks!

Jim Clanin
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
bobboinski
post Nov 7 2019, 08:07 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 23-April 16
From: Petaluma
Member No.: 19,929
Region Association: Northern California



I have 2 914's, a 1971 1.7 and a 1974 2.0. My 1971 is all original and the clutch feel is as you described. No real bite to the engagement of the clutch. The 2.0 is totally different, with a definite engagement point. The 1971 is my second 914 and after driving the 2.0 I just figured the clutch in the other car is close to needing replacement.
I know the clutch in the 2.0 is almost new as I have seen it. I'm just going to drive the other car until the clutch starts slipping, then replace it. But the difference in feel between the two cars is pretty amazing.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jamie
post Nov 7 2019, 08:24 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,074
Joined: 13-October 04
From: Georgetown,KY
Member No.: 2,939
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(bobboinski @ Nov 7 2019, 06:07 PM) *

I have 2 914's, a 1971 1.7 and a 1974 2.0. My 1971 is all original and the clutch feel is as you described. No real bite to the engagement of the clutch. The 2.0 is totally different, with a definite engagement point. The 1971 is my second 914 and after driving the 2.0 I just figured the clutch in the other car is close to needing replacement.
I know the clutch in the 2.0 is almost new as I have seen it. I'm just going to drive the other car until the clutch starts slipping, then replace it. But the difference in feel between the two cars is pretty amazing.

I suggest there are several factors that could cause variations in clutch engagement feel. When I replaced my master cylinder from 17mm original to available 19mm the clutch feel was quite different. Throw-out function, clutch adjustment, and other possibilities that are above my pay grade could also be factors.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bobboinski
post Nov 7 2019, 08:51 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 23-April 16
From: Petaluma
Member No.: 19,929
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Jamie @ Nov 7 2019, 07:24 PM) *

QUOTE(bobboinski @ Nov 7 2019, 06:07 PM) *

I have 2 914's, a 1971 1.7 and a 1974 2.0. My 1971 is all original and the clutch feel is as you described. No real bite to the engagement of the clutch. The 2.0 is totally different, with a definite engagement point. The 1971 is my second 914 and after driving the 2.0 I just figured the clutch in the other car is close to needing replacement.
I know the clutch in the 2.0 is almost new as I have seen it. I'm just going to drive the other car until the clutch starts slipping, then replace it. But the difference in feel between the two cars is pretty amazing.

I suggest there are several factors that could cause variations in clutch engagement feel. When I replaced my master cylinder from 17mm original to available 19mm the clutch feel was quite different. Throw-out function, clutch adjustment, and other possibilities that are above my pay grade could also be factors.


The clutch isn't hydraulic.... 914 not 993
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jamie
post Nov 8 2019, 12:31 PM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,074
Joined: 13-October 04
From: Georgetown,KY
Member No.: 2,939
Region Association: South East States



QUOTE(bobboinski @ Nov 7 2019, 06:51 PM) *

QUOTE(Jamie @ Nov 7 2019, 07:24 PM) *

QUOTE(bobboinski @ Nov 7 2019, 06:07 PM) *

I have 2 914's, a 1971 1.7 and a 1974 2.0. My 1971 is all original and the clutch feel is as you described. No real bite to the engagement of the clutch. The 2.0 is totally different, with a definite engagement point. The 1971 is my second 914 and after driving the 2.0 I just figured the clutch in the other car is close to needing replacement.
I know the clutch in the 2.0 is almost new as I have seen it. I'm just going to drive the other car until the clutch starts slipping, then replace it. But the difference in feel between the two cars is pretty amazing.

I suggest there are several factors that could cause variations in clutch engagement feel. When I replaced my master cylinder from 17mm original to available 19mm the clutch feel was quite different. Throw-out function, clutch adjustment, and other possibilities that are above my pay grade could also be factors.


The clutch isn't hydraulic.... 914 not 993

Ooops, yes the brakes felt different too!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd December 2024 - 10:00 AM