0-60 for a 914/6 with 3.2? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
0-60 for a 914/6 with 3.2? |
Tdskip |
Dec 22 2019, 01:45 PM
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,702 Joined: 1-December 17 From: soCal Member No.: 21,666 Region Association: None |
The numbers are secondary to the driving experience of course, but just curious if anyone’s ever benchmark to their conversion against a stopwatch?
|
SirAndy |
Dec 22 2019, 01:56 PM
Post
#2
|
Resident German Group: Admin Posts: 41,945 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Oakland, Kalifornia Member No.: 179 Region Association: Northern California |
The numbers are secondary to the driving experience of course, but just curious if anyone’s ever benchmark to their conversion against a stopwatch? I did some timed runs with my 3.6L and the biggest problem was getting the tires to hook and not spin. I don't use 1st gear at all and take off in 2nd and if i'm not careful i can still lay down 10 yards of rubber. That might look cool but it doesn't do you any good in terms of actually moving forward. The best time i got (that one time everything went perfect) was just under 4 seconds. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) |
Superhawk996 |
Dec 22 2019, 04:51 PM
Post
#3
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 6,599 Joined: 25-August 18 From: Woods of N. Idaho Member No.: 22,428 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
The numbers are secondary to the driving experience of course, but just curious if anyone’s ever benchmark to their conversion against a stopwatch? I did some timed runs with my 3.6L and the biggest problem was getting the tires to hook and not spin. I don't use 1st gear at all and take off in 2nd and if i'm not careful i can still lay down 10 yards of rubber. That might look cool but it doesn't do you any good in terms of actually moving forward. The best time i got (that one time everything went perfect) was just under 4 seconds. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/driving.gif) Not bad . . . but you need AWD! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) There is a reason the 959 had AWD. Tractive effort quickly becomes the limitation unless you're willing to run 18" wide rear rubber and to deal with the issues rubber that wide brings with it. Don't get me wrong guys, but, the reality is EV's have changed the game. Any 16 year old driving a Tesla Model S P100D AWD can do 0-60 in 2.5 seconds with absolutely zero drama and zero talent. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) Zero to sixty probably isn't the reason to own a 914. Just to be clear . . . no ill will meant for you guys with big engines. If I hit the lottery I just might build a 914 with a Singer engine but till then. The art of cornering is where the 914's strenth is at. |
Tdskip |
Dec 22 2019, 07:25 PM
Post
#4
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 3,702 Joined: 1-December 17 From: soCal Member No.: 21,666 Region Association: None |
Not bad . . . but you need AWD! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) There is a reason the 959 had AWD. Tractive effort quickly becomes the limitation unless you're willing to run 18" wide rear rubber and to deal with the issues rubber that wide brings with it. Don't get me wrong guys, but, the reality is EV's have changed the game. Any 16 year old driving a Tesla Model S P100D AWD can do 0-60 in 2.5 seconds with absolutely zero drama and zero talent. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/sad.gif) Zero to sixty probably isn't the reason to own a 914. Just to be clear . . . no ill will meant for you guys with big engines. If I hit the lottery I just might build a 914 with a Singer engine but till then. The art of cornering is where the 914's strenth is at. @Superhawk996 - I could care less what the actual zero-60 number is, it’s more the feel that I’m trying to get a sense of. I doubt I’ll be doing any violent acceleration in the car, it’s the sensation of the unburstable torque and how that moves the car along that I’m really after. It’s hard to describe what it feels like, but you guys get it The 3.2 L in the 74 911 has that feeling, trying to imagine that in the 914. I certainly didn’t need that white 914/6 to be any faster than it was, it was plenty fast but didn’t have the experience I was looking for. @mepstein - The engine in that white car felt like it was built for burst of acceleration rather than rolling-on power, if that makes sense. |
Superhawk996 |
Dec 23 2019, 03:15 AM
Post
#5
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 6,599 Joined: 25-August 18 From: Woods of N. Idaho Member No.: 22,428 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
it’s the sensation of the unburstable torque and how that moves the car along that I’m really after. It’s hard to describe what it feels like, but you guys get it @tdskip You're describing what comes with instantaneous torque. If you haven't driven a Tesla go drive one for a baseline. Don't get me wrong I'm not trying to put you in one but EV's have that instant torque and instant acceleration you're seeking. IMHO EV's have no soul and handle like pigs but that that is the nature of carrying around massive battery packs. Tesla supposedly working on a 3 motor Plaid mode with torque vectoring. That could become a handling game changer. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th December 2024 - 10:38 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |