Big Slice of Reality Pie., 2056 D-jet Dyno run |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Big Slice of Reality Pie., 2056 D-jet Dyno run |
Olympic 914 |
May 6 2021, 08:25 AM
Post
#21
|
Group: Members Posts: 1,699 Joined: 7-July 11 From: Pittsburgh PA Member No.: 13,287 Region Association: North East States |
Just got back from having the teener run on a Dyno.
Good and not as good as I expected. Was hoping for at least 100 Hp, didn't make it. This run was on a Mustang Dyno, allegedly a Dynojet Dyno reads from 12~15% higher. First the good. Runs were extremely consistent. the three runs printed pretty much right on top of each other. Torque was way up there above 95 tq from 3000 to 4500. with no real dips. HP numbers were very consistent with a nice smooth line from 2000 to over 4500 Now the bad Max HP was only read at 88 Hp and max torque was 100. If I add the 12-15% it comes to 100 Hp. But it is what it is. Build is 2056 D-jet, Heads by HAM RS+, 8.6 comp. Raby 9590 cam, SS HEs with Triad muffler. I Have adjusted the MPS to what seems to run best for this car. This car runs great and I just wanted to know what it was putting out, Not really planning to try to tune it for more power. Reliability is the key. and I am so far happy with that. Dyno sheet added (Date/time is wrong, 5/06/21 8:35am) |
iankarr |
May 7 2021, 06:05 AM
Post
#22
|
The wrencher formerly known as Cuddy_K Group: Members Posts: 2,512 Joined: 22-May 15 From: Heber City, UT Member No.: 18,749 Region Association: Intermountain Region |
I'm also in the torque over HP camp. And my current build seems to be very similar to yours...HAM heads, 9590 cam, 96mm KB pistons. Main difference is that I've decided to ditch (or try ditching at least) the D-jet and am going with the new turnkey EFI kit that PMB is developing. I've personally witnessed dyno results of that system installed on a stock 2.0 car getting north of 115 HP and 120 lb-ft of torque. The thing that tipped me over into going with modern EFI is the ability to dial things in with much greater precision. That, and the MPS is a mystery to me (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif). Hoping this system gives me every last ounce of power, better fuel economy and engine longevity. Will report back once it's in! Meantime, maybe @eric_shea can chime in with more info.
|
Montreal914 |
May 7 2021, 09:17 AM
Post
#23
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,675 Joined: 8-August 10 From: Claremont, CA Member No.: 12,023 Region Association: Southern California |
I'm also in the torque over HP camp. And my current build seems to be very similar to yours...HAM heads, 9590 cam, 96mm KB pistons. Main difference is that I've decided to ditch (or try ditching at least) the D-jet and am going with the new turnkey EFI kit that PMB is developing. I've personally witnessed dyno results of that system installed on a stock 2.0 car getting north of 115 HP and 120 lb-ft of torque. The thing that tipped me over into going with modern EFI is the ability to dial things in with much greater precision. That, and the MPS is a mystery to me (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif). Hoping this system gives me every last ounce of power, better fuel economy and engine longevity. Will report back once it's in! Meantime, maybe @eric_shea can chime in with more info. Are we talking MicroSquirt here, or some other EFI? |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 28th September 2024 - 04:28 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |