D-Jet vacuum hose question, Which hose, or Both? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
D-Jet vacuum hose question, Which hose, or Both? |
Olympic 914 |
Feb 10 2017, 07:45 AM
Post
#1
|
Group: Members Posts: 1,706 Joined: 7-July 11 From: Pittsburgh PA Member No.: 13,287 Region Association: North East States |
Just finished up installing all the FI wiring harness and the vacuum hoses and now the engine compartment looks like a bowl of Spaghetti.
This engine started out as a 73 1.7 with the stock FI and I converted everything to a 2.0 system. I did use some of the original 1.7 parts as they were the same for both engines. But all the 2.0 FI parts ( throttle body, plenum, air filter housing ,etc.) where cobbled together from fleabay purchases and I am not sure what years those parts were from. Also used the original 73 1.7 FI wiring harness and ECU and had to make a couple extensions to get everything to hook up. Not much problem there, (except for trying to connect those ground wires under the plenum. ) Now to the question, I was using Bowlsby's vacuum diagram that is for a late 74 2.0 system and while hooking up the vacuum lines to the dizzy it seem that one line is no longer used. in the diagram above I have the green vacuum hose connected from the throttle body to the dizzy as shown by the Orange circles. I also have another vacuum port on my dizzy that I have connected to the second vacuum port on my throttle body shown by Blue circles. Should I have both of these hooked up? or do I disconnect the Black vacuum line as shown in Bowlsby's diagram and just plug the second port on the throttle body. This is what I have hooked up now. Is there a reason that the later versions did not have this second port hooked up? What benefits are there to using the second line to the dizzy vacuum canister? in picture below the green line from the throttle body is routed differently |
Stratfink |
Dec 4 2022, 02:14 PM
Post
#2
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 27-December 21 From: SoCal Member No.: 26,198 Region Association: Southern California |
Getting ready for a throttle body rebuild and planning to use a spare core, but noted a difference in my spare relative to the part installed in my 75 2.0L.
My installed throttle body has 2 vacuum ports which I understand are for the vacuum advance and retard (I actually found the advance line loose at the distribution vac can). I am looking to confirm that the best course of action is to retain the dual ported throttle body versus rebuilding the single port body and capping the retard line at the distributor. Pretty new to this so I appreciate the feedback to confirm. Pics of my installed and spare bodies are below. Installed on my ‘75 2.0L: Spare throttle body: |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 09:32 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |