Bus 4 spd trans, Anybody done this |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Bus 4 spd trans, Anybody done this |
jwalters |
Jan 21 2005, 06:38 PM
Post
#1
|
Sooo Close....... Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 14-May 04 From: Huntsville, AL Member No.: 2,068 Region Association: Europe |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif)
Thought of an interesting topic---has anybody put a beefed up bus or t1 trans in the teener---- I loved the gear spacing on my old superbug--and first gear for my car,,well,,,sucks ass--and second is too tall for a good start off-- Would rather spend 650 bucks on a pro-streeter WITH a rhino case and super diff than thousands upgrading my 901-- Sand rail mid engine cable shifter should be able to be adapted rather easily and the trans install is a non-event... What you think???? (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/confused24.gif) |
jwalters |
Jan 23 2005, 07:55 AM
Post
#2
|
Sooo Close....... Group: Members Posts: 1,677 Joined: 14-May 04 From: Huntsville, AL Member No.: 2,068 Region Association: Europe |
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/biggrin.gif) Andys---I do admit I have not done this kind of math in a long time, and I do not have my cheat book auto math in front of me--but to kinda look at this from the other side of the coin:
Lets say that high gear is 1:1 + a 4.429:1 R&P , net ratio = 4.429 A .71 and .84 high gear is less than one--we are taking away--hence, subtraction, I do remember that much from the pre algebra course I took ( I am not a mathematician, and do not claim to be, I use cheat sheets all the time) So this is not a multiplication problem----A 4.429 R&P is being turned slightly more than per engine rotation, or, .29 times more or put into a % --29% more if the input shaft = 1, and it does. Due to the overdriven .71 gearset With high gear we have taken away tq multiplication--we are now subtracting tq from a 1:1 constant So now plug this into the equation-- 1 - .84 = .16 1 - .71 = .29 These are the difference of our 1:1 constant We then take these away from our R&P : Because it is being overdriven by this much with our constant of 1 : 3.88 - .16 = 3.72 Final drive The engine is turning 3.72 times per full revolution of the wheel. 4.429 - .29 = 4.139 final drive The engine is turning 4.139 times per full revolution of the wheel. This is a difference of .419 between the two, not much on paper, but a tremendous amount in practice. Remember, the high gear is overdriving the input shaft to the R&P, 1:1 is our base constant--if the high gear set was in fact 1:1, but because of the overdriven high gear we must take this difference away from the R&P. only when the cogs are of a greater value than 1 do they become a Division equation of underdrive, hence, a 12 tooth input meshed with a 27 tooth output you get a ratio, or division of 2.25:1, hence the 12 tooth one will turn 2.25 times for one turn of the 27 toothed one. We are discussing less than one, .71 & .84 This is a division equation of overdrive to be subtracted from the R&P. All underdrive equations are added to the R&P. The gear sets themselve only multiply torque, this is a theoretical value-they do not multiply themslves, they divide speed for speed. I hope this makes sense, the term torque multiplication is just that--theoretical tq--the gears are meshed in a multiplicative manner--whatever gear is driving the other it has a constant of 1, no matter how many teeth it has, it is still 1-but by mulitplying 1 you only get the same constant--- therefore-they always divide speed for speed. A division of a ratio of 12:27 is 2.25:1, this does in fact mean that the work output is multiplied by that same constant, 1 x 2.25 = 2.25, or 100 ftlb of tq x 2.25 = 225 ftlb of tq. But work is not tangible, you cannot hold horspower in your hands ( the numerical value) so this stays in theory only. But I also do admit that I could be wrong--as I stated I am no mathematician, and even I am staring at my avatar a little too much (IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/html/emoticons/wub.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th January 2025 - 06:31 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |