2024 Porsche 914?, Dall-E designed Options

[trylon]

[wonkipop]

from a critical artistic and technological point of view of view what is called AI is not intelligence.

for one reason. it is impossible for it to be original.

its merely recombining the past (stuff that already exists).

which is what all these images are.
this is what happened to architectural design in the 1980s.
it was called post modernism.

@JeffBowlsby knows what i mean.


--------

to get this into perspective.
it would be impossible for AI to conceive of the APOLLO project to land on the moon.
the entire apollo project was original.
never done before. there were no images to remix and reconfigure.
the APOLLO moon landing is the proof of just how powerful the human brain is.

mind you i am not discounting the idea there could truly be AI in the future.
but this gentleman is not it.

this is AS ----- >ARTIFICIAL STOOPIDITY.
check the view through the windscreen of these renderings.
the far side of the car in all the renderings does not match the visible near side.
there is a fricken quarter window behind the door. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif)

onwards into the future which has not arrived yet.
except in 1969 when the 914 was launched and looked original.
and neil armstrong planted his original design moonboot in the moon dust while wearing his original design moon suit having steered his original design moon vehicle down on to the surface. a new problem begats originality as a solution every time.
lets see if this BS version of AI could deliver those kinds of answers.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

[mate914]

from a critical artistic and technological point of view of view what is called AI is not intelligence.

for one reason. it is impossible for it to be original.

its merely recombining the past (stuff that already exists).

which is what all these images are.
this is what happened to architectural design in the 1980s.
it was called post modernism.

@JeffBowlsby knows what i mean.


--------

to get this into perspective.
it would be impossible for AI to conceive of the APOLLO project to land on the moon.
the entire apollo project was original.
never done before. there were no images to remix and reconfigure.
the APOLLO moon landing is the proof of just how powerful the human brain is.

mind you i am not discounting the idea there could truly be AI in the future.
but this gentleman is not it.

this is AS ----- >ARTIFICIAL STOOPIDITY.
check the view through the windscreen of these renderings.
the far side of the car in all the renderings does not match the visible near side.
there is a fricken quarter window behind the door. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beer.gif)

onwards into the future which has not arrived yet.
except in 1969 when the 914 was launched and looked original.
and neil armstrong planted his original design moonboot in the moon dust while wearing his original design moon suit having steered his original design moon vehicle down on to the surface. a new problem begats originality as a solution every time.
lets see if this BS version of AI could deliver those kinds of answers.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)

Sounds about right. It can not produce original design. It can only copy what man has done. Sometimes your wise also...
Matt