Cross roads between a big /4 and a big/6, Share your experience |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Cross roads between a big /4 and a big/6, Share your experience |
Montreal914 |
Sep 5 2024, 08:31 AM
Post
#1
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,742 Joined: 8-August 10 From: Claremont, CA Member No.: 12,023 Region Association: Southern California |
I am at a cross road in my narrow body restoration project. This is not an original build, but rather a sleeper 914 with nice elements. The chassis will be reinforced with an inner kit and outer RD clamshell.
The car will be converted to 5 lugs using the right 3" 911 struts/hubs and drilled rear hubs. The braking system is Alfa Brembo calipers in the front and 914-6 reproduction rears with appropriate 19mm MC. Sport Bilstein all around and 140 rear springs. Front 19mm and std rear sway bar. Wheels will either be Fuchs 15" x 6" or 16" x 6". I have no intentions of shoehorning 7" wide wheels in the back, no fender stretching. My engine options are as follow: I have all the nice bits to build a 2.3 4 cylinder (HAM heads, Nickies, rods, crank, block with large studs, Tangerine headers, yadi yada...). I would setup a modern EFI to it and should conservatively get 150-160 HP out of it. I have an opportunity to get a 3.2 Motronic 6 cylinder, 200+ HP. I plan on using a 901 gearbox and I already have the Tarett heavy duty CV/shafts kit. Although it may seem obvious that the desired option would be to go with the six, again, this is a narrow body with 6" wide wheels. My concern is the drastic amount of power and the additional mass on this car's configuration. A while back I remember reading a comment from Pete Stout @horizontally-opposed , where I recall him saying somethnig like he felt the 914 has a better balance with a 4 cylinder engine, but he was willing to make that tradeoff to have the sound, smoothness and pleasure of a 6 cylinder. That being said, his beautiful car (reference narrow body in my book (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wub.gif) ) is equipped with a small 2.2 six. I have some engine weight data that looks like this: 4 cylinder: ~321lbs 2.4 six cylinder: ~400 3.2 six cylinder: ~485lbs I have never riden let alone driven a 6 cylinder powered 914, but I do have 10 years of daily California canyon driving mine (4 cylinder 2056). I know how the 4 cylinder car feels and I can probably picture how it would drive with a large /4. I would like to hear what people have experience with their narrow bodied 3.2 conversion (I am sure there must be some), and what they prefer, their old 4 or their new six. I appreciate and value all of your comments! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smilie_pokal.gif) Thank you, Eric |
Chris914n6 |
Sep 5 2024, 09:11 AM
Post
#2
|
Jackstands are my life. Group: Members Posts: 3,431 Joined: 14-March 03 From: Las Vegas, NV Member No.: 431 Region Association: Southwest Region |
First, I'd go 16 for the better tire choices. A 205/55-16 is stock Boxster front and they make just about every tire for that.
Is a 3.2 really that heavy? That's near SBC and I can tell you that feels heavy in a 914. Sounds like you would be happier with the -4. Your wallet would be too as you would still need the oil tank and exhaust and external oil cooler. That extra 50hp will cost a pretty penny. I've driven a couple big 4s and non-turbo subarus, they are spunky. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 15th January 2025 - 07:56 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |