Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 914-6 finally gets it's dyno runs, The dyno raises more questions
RogerPihlaja
post Dec 8 2024, 02:45 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 23-December 20
From: Sanford, Michigan, USA 48657
Member No.: 25,013
Region Association: Upper MidWest



So, I finally found a chassis dyno that was willing to run my 1970 914-6. The 3.0 liter 911 SC engine had about 1000 break-in miles on it. The attached file has 3 hp & torque curves from 3 dyno pulls superimposed. A 6300 rpm redline was observed. As you can see, the engine is still pulling hard at 6300 rpm and would produce more power if it were spun faster. I have heard 3.0 liter 911 SC engines are safe to rev to 7000 rpm; but, I wanted to get confirmation before I tried it. The engine has a Clewett Engineering engine management system with MAP fuel injection, coil at plug electronic ignition, wide range oxygen sensor closed loop, 1-5/8" ID Billy Boat headers, and a twin outlet sport muffler. The valves, springs, pistons, connecting rods, and crankshaft are stock. There is a mild cam from WEBCAM (Grind #40) in it.

I was somewhat surprised at the shape of the torque vs rpm curve. The dip in the torque curve between about 2600 - 3600 rpm reminds me of the bad old days of emission controls with carburetors. The [Air]/[Fuel] ratio would often go lean just off idle resulting in a flat spot in engine response and driveability around town. Do I need to remap the fuel flow for more fuel in that rpm region? Or, what else might be causing this dip in torque? Also, the flat shape of the torque "curve" surprised me. Isn't there supposed to be more of a peak? This isn't some "tractor" engine?

By the way, the engine sounds great on the dyno! I have a video file with audio; but, it's ~31 mbytes. If someone has a way to deal with a big file on the website, please let me know and I'd be glad to share it.Attached File  TooSlo86_Racing_Dyno_Chart.pdf ( 599.22k ) Number of downloads: 97
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
flyer86d
post Dec 10 2024, 03:32 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 453
Joined: 12-January 11
From: Corea, Maine
Member No.: 12,585
Region Association: North East States



It looks like you are leaving a bunch of power on the table. As everyone said before, recheck the cam timing and ignition timing. It should be stronger. My old short stroke 3.2 with GE-80 cams made 320hp at 7500 rpm. We shifted it at 7500 and would take it to 8200 in a short burst if we had to get by someone. Stock rods…. Sue once mistakenly got 3rd gear instead of 5th on the back straight at Watkins Glen shifting out of 4th at 7000 rpm. Don’t know what it revved to but it wasn’t hurt and we did a lot of track events after that….. SC’s are very stout! Perhaps the best that Porsche produced.

Charlie
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
8 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th December 2024 - 11:36 AM