First start after 25 years - problems |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
First start after 25 years - problems |
spencercanon |
Dec 16 2024, 12:27 PM
Post
#1
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 25-November 24 From: Bishop, California Member No.: 28,482 Region Association: Central California |
Hi all this is my first post here! I recently picked up a ’75 1.8 that was last registered in 2001! Pretty good barn find, in my opinion. It was up in the high desert of California, so no rust, great mechanicals, all the electrics work. Just flaking paint, decayed interior …and an engine that probably hasn’t run since the Clinton Administration.
The TLDR is the car has started and run for 10 seconds but now won’t start at all. A quick timeline of what I’ve done/tested: - Dropped the engine, adjusted valves (encountered something strange that I’ll ask about later) - Old starter could barely turn the engine over. Replaced it with a hi-torque. - good compression - Replaced the old broken bellows thermostat - New fuel lines, vac lines, spark plugs and wires - deleted EGR system - Fuel pump was getting power but dead - replaced it. - Coil’s good. Cap and rotor look good. Points gapped. - The L-Jet AFM had been opened and the adjustment wheel inside was so loose that it the flap wasn’t closing fully so the pump was running continuously. I rotated the wheel until there was enough tension to turn off the fuel pump. (I would have normally never touched the AFM!) Put the engine back in and the car started on the key immediately, ran for 10 seconds and died. I tried again, it started and ran for 5 seconds, then popped loudly back up the intake with enough force to blow the intake boot off the AFM. Since then, it hasn’t started. Couple notes: - after the pop, I felt like the intake pipe connector hoses were probably leaking, so I put hose clamps on them. With those clamped down and fresh vac lines everywhere, I’m pretty sure there aren’t any more leaks. - oil filler breather nipple broke so I’ve taped it off until I can get a new one. But I’m not sure how this affects the vacuum… should it be left open for now? - I don’t know the fuel pressure but it does have a new pump and lines so I’d be surprised if pressure is the problem. - tested injector ballasts and got correct ohm readings - It did start and run on its own spark and fuel, so I assume ECU and injectors are OK. - the AFM is obviously an issue … probably considerably off. But again, the car did at least start a few times. So now what? - I’d like to check/test anything I can before I start buying replacement components. - Are there baseline settings for idle speed screw, and at least a “best guess” AFM setup? - Should I just buy another AFM now, knowing this one may never be right again? - could the intake backfire have damaged something? Thanks in advance for your thoughts! Attached image(s) |
technicalninja |
Dec 18 2024, 09:48 AM
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 2,084 Joined: 31-January 23 From: Granbury Texas Member No.: 27,135 Region Association: Southwest Region |
3) I physically verified #1 TDC and the distributor is 180 off. Is it that easy to install the distributor drive shaft backwards?? Please excuse me if I'm reading this wrong..... But the piston is at TDC twice per power cycle, once on exhaust stroke and once on compression. If the piston is on TDC exhaust stroke the rotor button will be 180* out. If you put it in 180 out (this is 360 degrees crankshaft movement) and merely swap the wires two positions it will run just fine. WHOOOOSH! Right over his head @artfrombama Please let me know what I'm missing. For the OP. During top end tear down I'd be looking for evidence of exceptional VS evidence of ineptitude. Springs or shims on rocker arm shafts. Shims are better. Adjusters on rocker arms, single or two piece with elephants' foot (911 style). Two piece better Pushrods- aluminum VS steel. steel is better Gasket/fire ring between head and jug. Believe it or not, not having this part installed is better. Another commonly upgraded part is the studs which hold the rocker arms in. Bigger is better here. The stock stuff will work fine but you have to be damn careful to not over torque these as they are prone to pulling the threads out of the head. When head apart. Exhaust guide huge VS same size as intake. Same size better (at least more modern) That big ass exhaust guide also means sodium filled exhaust valve. You REALLY shouldn't machine sodium filled valves. The world has moved AWAY from sodium filled valves. It IS possible to have an explosion/fire machining sodium filled valves. All of the core heads I've torn down now (3 pairs) have had completely trashed exhaust valve guides. Valves are "floppy" loose in the guides. If you find a bunch of modern or improved parts, then it's possible that someone knowledgeable did the engine. If someone merely installed hydraulic lifters where solids were supposed to go, then both the cam and lifters are TRASH! Pulling a lifter will allow you to look into the lifter bore and view the cam lobe. The wear patterns on the lobes would "tell the tale" for me. Nice even wear with no flat spots or weird "ghosting" patterns on the lobes is what I'm looking for. Normally if someone just swaps in new lifters on an old camshaft it TRASHES the lobes, and you can see the damage easily. The face of the lifter can show damage as well. Good Luck Tell us what you find. |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st December 2024 - 08:29 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |