1976 2.0 on carburetors?, Good bye Fuel injection? |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
1976 2.0 on carburetors?, Good bye Fuel injection? |
Mr.Vman |
Dec 21 2024, 05:47 PM
Post
#1
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 1-October 24 From: Sierra Vista, AZ. Member No.: 28,388 Region Association: Southwest Region |
!976 2.0 barn find, been sitting for yearsn no rust, good condtion. Going through brakes and chassis rubber, struts, shocks make a nice driver. Have not driven the car yet, has fuel injection, idle varies, vacuum leak? What is going on with no carburetors on a stock 2.0? Because of the camshaft timing carburetors do poorly? Is this true or a tale? Seems carburetors would be simple. Is this a myth of no carburetors on a 2.0? Thanks for the time and information. Steve V.
|
dr914@autoatlanta.com |
Dec 21 2024, 05:51 PM
Post
#2
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 8,109 Joined: 3-January 07 From: atlanta georgia Member No.: 7,418 Region Association: None |
the 914 engine is built for fuel injection. Read my dissertation in the tech tips 700 about the evils of cave man fuel injection, CARBs. Really really bad
!976 2.0 barn find, been sitting for yearsn no rust, good condtion. Going through brakes and chassis rubber, struts, shocks make a nice driver. Have not driven the car yet, has fuel injection, idle varies, vacuum leak? What is going on with no carburetors on a stock 2.0? Because of the camshaft timing carburetors do poorly? Is this true or a tale? Seems carburetors would be simple. Is this a myth of no carburetors on a 2.0? Thanks for the time and information. Steve V. |
Superhawk996 |
Dec 21 2024, 10:51 PM
Post
#3
|
914 Guru Group: Members Posts: 6,592 Joined: 25-August 18 From: Woods of N. Idaho Member No.: 22,428 Region Association: Galt's Gulch |
!976 2.0 barn find, been sitting for yearsn no rust, good condtion. Going through brakes and chassis rubber, struts, shocks make a nice driver. Have not driven the car yet, has fuel injection, idle varies, vacuum leak? What is going on with no carburetors on a stock 2.0? Because of the camshaft timing carburetors do poorly? Is this true or a tale? Seems carburetors would be simple. Is this a myth of no carburetors on a 2.0? Thanks for the time and information. Steve V. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/welcome.png) Poor dude is 6 posts in and already the thread has gone sideways (IMG:style_emoticons/default/av-943.gif) “What is going on with no carburetors on a stock 2.0? Because of the camshaft timing carburetors do poorly?”. As noted the 2.0L four cylinder cars are fuel injected. As noted, due to the mild cam used with the OEM fuel injection the use of carbs with that cam leaves a bit to be desired when used with carbs. Will it run? Of course but it will run a lot better with a cam better suited to carbs. The problem of course is that the cam swap involves tearing the engine down and splitting the case. It also requires new lifters for the new cam. Not rocket science but also not for the faint of heart, non-wrenching types. Per suggestion by others, it’s worth keeping the stock Fuel Injection if at all possible. Good luck with the project (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd December 2024 - 09:20 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |