2.0 build to 2056 or 2270?, Which cam would be best ?? Going carburetorated, with 96mm pistons |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
2.0 build to 2056 or 2270?, Which cam would be best ?? Going carburetorated, with 96mm pistons |
zman914 |
Dec 20 2024, 06:02 PM
Post
#1
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 25-July 23 From: Vacaville, ca Member No.: 27,483 Region Association: Northern California |
Looking to do a 2056 or 2270 build from a stock 2.0. Changing over to carburetorated, with 96mm pistons.. Looking for good cam advise. I'm looking for more hp, but very reliable.
|
VaccaRabite |
Dec 23 2024, 06:58 AM
Post
#2
|
En Garde! Group: Admin Posts: 13,628 Joined: 15-December 03 From: Dallastown, PA Member No.: 1,435 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
I'm a big fan of the Web494 cam. Good torque, requires HD springs, isn't a total dog off the line. Lets you have a lot of fun with a stock redline, and you don't have to be in a super narrow powerband at the top of the rev range for it to make power. I ran one with carbs, and I ran one with modern fuel injection on a 2056 for about a decade.
Whatever you do, don't got with a cam advertised as a race cam. May make more peak power, but you will have nothing until 4000 rpm and it will be a total dog around town. Zach |
barefoot |
Dec 23 2024, 07:50 AM
Post
#3
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,335 Joined: 19-March 13 From: Charleston SC Member No.: 15,673 Region Association: South East States |
I'm a big fan of the Web494 cam. Good torque, requires HD springs, isn't a total dog off the line. Lets you have a lot of fun with a stock redline, and you don't have to be in a super narrow powerband at the top of the rev range for it to make power. I ran one with carbs, and I ran one with modern fuel injection on a 2056 for about a decade. Whatever you do, don't got with a cam advertised as a race cam. May make more peak power, but you will have nothing until 4000 rpm and it will be a total dog around town. Zach I'm using the 494 in a 2056 with Dell 40's I just kept the stock springs as I will not be revving past 5500 which the cam is rated for for max power. Good low end torque as I typically don't bother with 1st gear and pulls nicely from my 1000 idle rpm (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Barefoot |
VaccaRabite |
Dec 30 2024, 08:25 AM
Post
#4
|
En Garde! Group: Admin Posts: 13,628 Joined: 15-December 03 From: Dallastown, PA Member No.: 1,435 Region Association: MidAtlantic Region |
I'm using the 494 in a 2056 with Dell 40's I just kept the stock springs as I will not be revving past 5500 which the cam is rated for for max power. Good low end torque as I typically don't bother with 1st gear and pulls nicely from my 1000 idle rpm (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif) Barefoot That is the one downside of the 494. You are not going to have a 700 rpm idle. It wants to idle around 900-1000 rpm. I've had 2 versions of this camshaft (the Web494, and the Raby shaft that added a touch of exhaust duration to the 494 profile - but I can't recall the part number now). Both of them wanted to idle around 1000 rpm. Zach |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd January 2025 - 06:47 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |