![]() |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
![]() |
930cabman |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,874 Joined: 12-November 20 From: Buffalo Member No.: 24,877 Region Association: North East States ![]() ![]() |
Looking at this technology from 60+ years ago
https://www.macsmotorcitygarage.com/secrets...-ram-induction/ wondering has anyone gone after another 10% give or take? |
![]() ![]() |
technicalninja |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,377 Joined: 31-January 23 From: Granbury Texas Member No.: 27,135 Region Association: Southwest Region ![]() ![]() |
Pretty much ALL of the OEMs went that way...
That is the REASON Tygaboy's Ferrari has the extra butterflys in the intake. In the 90s I saw a proliferation of variable length intake tracts. The MOST COMPLEX ones were on the Mazda Rotary engine. It had a rotating barrel in it and could vary the intake tract incrementally. Those were exotic as shit! Most set ups have a long (low speed) and a short position (high speed). VLIs are less common now but I still see them occasionally. I believe what happened is the OEMs figured out designing the intake for a specific range (1500-2500rpm is my guess) worked OK across all ranges but created the very best fuel economy without the complexity of the variable BS. The Lamborghini V10 that is also used in the Audis has a MONSTER complicated intake plenum because of this crap and that intake in the MOST COMMON failure point in that drive train. There are multiple YouTube vids on that intake and its repair. Edit: The modular intake for the type 4 I designed has long correctly tapered tubes with the largest radius I could fit into a 914 (improve torque in low to mid-range) to a central plenum with a single electronic T-body. The "injector mount" section would be super short and the flange in the DCOE pattern so that a guy building a high RPM motor could fit the butterflys closer to the valves that any other option. super short DCOE throttle bodies are available. https://www.jenvey.co.uk/throttle-bodies-an...m-vshort-tssxxi |
jd74914 |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Its alive ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,834 Joined: 16-February 04 From: CT Member No.: 1,659 Region Association: North East States ![]() |
Pretty much ALL of the OEMs went that way... Yep. But in modern day, you often see more gains (remember-the key is maximizing the area under the efficiency curve) with variable valve timing and valve lift controls. Throttle bodies and long intake runners have high pumping losses associated with them (think drinking through a small straw) and space contraints so the real control point is moving towards the valves. That's why some cars currently only have 2 position throttle bodies (think some BMWs). |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 5th February 2025 - 11:00 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |