Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> OT: for Canadians only, Banned in Canada
davep
post Apr 7 2005, 07:35 AM
Post #1


914 Historian
*****

Group: Benefactors
Posts: 5,161
Joined: 13-October 03
From: Burford, ON, N0E 1A0
Member No.: 1,244
Region Association: Canada



CQ site

This site has a lot of info that is under publication ban in Canada. Info we are not supposed to know or let others know. Yeah right.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
GWN7
post Apr 7 2005, 11:13 AM
Post #2


King of Road Trips
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,280
Joined: 31-December 02
From: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Member No.: 56
Region Association: Northstar Region



Read the info a couple days ago when it was reported on the National News. Google search - Adscam/blogs gave me all the links I needed.

I wonder if the AG will go after my misspent $250,000,000 in tax money as hard as he will go after anyone who reports a link?

The liberals got caught with there hands deep in the cookie jar.

I wonder if the public will be as apathetic as they were in the satelite scandal a few years ago? (The former Prime Ministers son-in-law was VP of Power Corp. which owns one of the shitty satelite companies up here. No one was buying it because for less money (and no taxes) you could get better programing from a US supplier, so the government passed a new law (even tho several court cases said it wasn't illegal to watch US signals) making it illegal to watch US television unless you bought it from a approved Canadian supplier.)

This whole thing (the ban) is a stall tactic to allow more time for those involved to cover their tracks. Sort of like the Airbus scandal where a former PM had several months to clean out his Swiss Bank account. When he revealed the ballance in it he only had 2k in the account. He never revealed all the transactions that went thru that acount and then sued for defamation of character and won. Why he had one in the first place is my question?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th June 2024 - 11:10 PM