Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> 1972 GT Clone
MarkV
post Jul 3 2003, 01:21 AM
Post #1


Fear the Jack Stands
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,493
Joined: 15-January 03
From: Sunny Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 154
Region Association: None



No Reserve (IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool_shades.gif)

The URL is locked so you can't cut & paste. :finger2: :finger2:

Featured 32,000


Attached image(s)
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
krk
post Jul 3 2003, 08:49 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 997
Joined: 27-December 02
From: San Jose
Member No.: 22



Well, it's a nice enough car, and it would cost quite a bit to replicate. The 916 reference is probably spurious marketing-speak. I'm with Anton on this -- I don't see anything 916 about it -- the most obvious point is the front and rear bumpers are wrong. (But I prefer the gt look, so I actually like the front better anyway - the splitter is an interesting addition -- I wonder if the bumper is real or fg.) 916's all had pretty custom interiors as well. Often leather, or that cool paisley interior we saw recently.

The interior looks like the single place that the owner could have spent more money/time completing. It looks like a pretty stock 914 interior with a change out of seats, instruments and rollbar. The driver's door still has the screw holes in it for the stock door handle (sort of cheezy). The instruments you normally change out on a 6-conversion anyway -- I'm not personally a fan of the white face look, and I doubt that porsche was in '72, but I could be wrong. I can't see a gas gauge anywhere but there aren't a lot of pics of the interior. The 916's I've seen pics of used a stock gauge under the dash where the console would have been.

Basically, it looks like a pretty nicely done 6 conversion. Some parts are hard to tell, of course -- not much detail on the engine/tranny combo (a newly built 3.0 w/goodies can be a 10K - 15K toy) or the actual suspension/brake goodies. To get to call it something like "gt clone", you probably have to do more work tho, as a lot of the details are not very close. (dashboard should be felt, door panels, etc)

There are too many colors in the engine compartment.

I do like the koenig's. Dunno if I'd use red tho.

It would be interesting to see better pics of the back pad. It looks like they sectioned it to fit the seats. It looks like felt/carpet on the sides, but I can't quite make it out. There's a nice new screw above the interior light that probably polishes up real nice with chrome polish. lol.

As far as pricing, this would be interesting if I were considering building a car with specs pretty close to this one. Then it's a build or buy decision. But I'm not, so others will have to chime in about the 32K reality check.

kim.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
MarkV   1972 GT Clone   Jul 3 2003, 01:21 AM
914Timo   Nice car, but $32k ??? :o The direct link ...   Jul 3 2003, 02:35 AM
FlatSix   The car is advertised as a 1972 GT clone. NO WAY...   Jul 3 2003, 06:13 AM
Anton   For 32K one can get a lot of Porsche NOT being a f...   Jul 3 2003, 06:29 AM
tat2dphreak   you can have 12-16 decent 914's or this 1... 3...   Jul 3 2003, 08:08 AM
Bleyseng   How can you get 12-16 decent 914's the same as...   Jul 3 2003, 08:24 AM
tat2dphreak   I guess I should have specified 914/4s....   Jul 3 2003, 08:31 AM
Qarl   This car has been for sale for about 1 year at tha...   Jul 3 2003, 08:33 AM
krk   Well, it's a nice enough car, and it would cos...   Jul 3 2003, 08:49 AM
cha914   As mentioned above...the front splitter is a piece...   Jul 3 2003, 10:32 AM
Andyrew   From the looks of it, it looks custom made. I am c...   Jul 3 2003, 11:36 AM
silver six   I agree with Kim. I, more or less, like the car. ...   Jul 3 2003, 12:12 PM
anthony   You guys are hard on cars. Besides the marketing s...   Jul 3 2003, 12:47 PM
Lawrence914-6   I emailed the seller and asked him if he even knew...   Jul 3 2003, 12:56 PM
SirAndy     Jul 3 2003, 01:01 PM
krk   <...   Jul 3 2003, 01:01 PM
Lawrence914-6  
QUOTE
  Jul 3 2003, 01:13 PM
krk   <...   Jul 3 2003, 01:22 PM
Lawrence914-6   The salesman's reply: -----Original Message-...   Jul 3 2003, 01:32 PM
Lawrence914-6   My reply back: Sir, Porsche DID build a stock 91...   Jul 3 2003, 01:32 PM
Anton   Rusty, this is exactly the point: they are mislead...   Jul 3 2003, 02:15 PM
Mountain914   From the looks of the picture - it's a dealers...   Jul 3 2003, 02:17 PM
Lawrence914-6   It's a beautiful car. But I remember back whe...   Jul 3 2003, 02:52 PM
silver six   To me the real issue is not whether the car is nic...   Jul 3 2003, 02:56 PM
Anton   There's ...   Jul 3 2003, 03:31 PM
seanery   <...   Jul 3 2003, 04:26 PM
Qarl   Geez Rusty! Every time I correct someone in a...   Jul 3 2003, 04:27 PM
Lawrence914-6  
QUOTE
  Jul 3 2003, 04:31 PM
Cdn Teener   <...   Jul 3 2003, 04:34 PM
VegasRacer  
QUOTE
  Jul 3 2003, 06:45 PM
Frederickcr   THANK YOU VERY MUCH KIM !!!   Jul 3 2003, 06:48 PM
Jeroen   I don't get the b-ing and moaning about "false...   Jul 3 2003, 06:49 PM
MarkV   Frederick is abviously a stand-up kinda of guy. Yo...   Jul 3 2003, 06:49 PM
Frederickcr   THANK YOU VEGAS RACER! I will now ask for help...   Jul 3 2003, 06:50 PM
Frederickcr   That Car I only got to drive around in the parking...   Jul 3 2003, 06:53 PM
Lawrence914-6   Jeroen... I bitch and moan about almost anything....   Jul 3 2003, 06:54 PM
krk  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 28th June 2024 - 08:29 AM