Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Emissions problems ....
jsteele22
post Sep 30 2005, 10:29 AM
Post #1


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 727
Joined: 24-August 05
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Member No.: 4,653





A few of my new friends in law enforcement convinced me to get my '76 2.0L registered, which means an emissions test. The PO had problems (back in '98) and the car hasn't been clean since then; that's one reason I had been putting this off.

I've already replaced points, rotor, cap, wires, and plugs. Adjusted dwell (which I feel pretty sure about) and timing (which I'm less sure about). For the timing, I used the handy template from Pelican Parts website, and put a visible mark on the impeller. But its so hard to work through that viewport that I might be off by a little either way.

Also, I ran 3 tanks of gas w/ injector cleaner (and *did* see some improvement during that time). I found that my decel valve did not work, and removed it. I had problems w/ the AAR wire shorting to ground, blowing a fuse, so I removed it. All of my vacuum hoses are new. And although my idle is still high (1146), I haven't been able to track down any leaks... The screw in the TB is all the way shut, and the knob on the FI box is all the way (oh jeez, which way was it ? - I think it was CW).

I adjusted the valves before the RRC (about 1000) mi of driving. That (simultaneously w/ timing) made a major improvement, as two exhaust valves were too tight. Towards the end of the RRC I did a little spirited driving (awesome) and on the trip home pushed kinda hard up a pass. Since then the engine has a slight roughness, so maybe valves need re-adjusting.

Anyway, the car idles at 1146 RPM, and the numbers there are : HC 1156 PPM (limit 600) and CO % 3.73 (limit 3.50). Of course, like an idiot, I didn't get the car fully warmed up before (it takes like 15 minutes of serious driving).





Anyway, my main goal right now is to get the thing to pass, fast and cheap. Failing that, if I put $75 into diagnosing the problem (at a legit business) I can get a waiver.
I won't need to do this again, as my county is cancelling its emissions program in Dec. '06

My other goal is to know what's wrong. I just got the car, and I know its burning a little oil (rings and/or valve guides) so I'm deciding how to proceed : I'm toying w/ a mild Subaru swap if I can do it cheap enough...


Any hints appreciated....


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
jsteele22
post Oct 19 2005, 10:46 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 727
Joined: 24-August 05
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Member No.: 4,653




For posterity, I just wanted to add a followup.

Since the original (failed) emmissions test, I made a few changes. One (huge) one was the timing. I think that the first time I set my timing, I actually set it at idle, rather than at 3500 RPM, which is where it is specified. Also, since I know the engine burns (and leaks) oil, I switched to a SAE 40 plus Lucas Oil Stabilizer (Bottle o' Snot). Engine's a little on the sluggish side when I start up cold, but runs fine when warm. I don't plan on driving on those -40 degree days... Also, following Cap'n's advice, I set the valves to .016". Afterwards the engine ran smoother (the valves were in need of adjusting) but I was suprised that there wasn't a horrible clatter from having the valves set so loose - sounded just like normal. I replaced the fuel filter, some old fuel line, nearly all of the FI hose in the engine bay (including the short stubs to the injectors, which were pinching a little) and the fuel injector seals. I don't have the tools for compression or leakdown, so I didn't know what these numbers were. And I did use 87 octane.

So I took the car in on Monday, and the HC problem was gone. The CO was somewhat above the limits ( I think it was 3%, and limit is 2.5%, but I don't have it here w/ me.) So I left it at the garage and let the guy do his thing. For $35 (including the $15 test fee) he tweaked the mixture, switched the retard line over to advance (which consensus here says is *not* the right place ...) and got the numbers low enough to pass. So I'm one step closer to being legal -- gonna go back to the DMV this afternoon (had to get a VIN verification).

A frosty virtual beer to all who helped...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
jsteele22   Emissions problems ....   Sep 30 2005, 10:29 AM
SLITS   One suggested method is to add 10% by volume of al...   Sep 30 2005, 10:37 AM
jsteele22     Sep 30 2005, 11:07 AM
lapuwali   The build date is right there on the VIN plate wit...   Sep 30 2005, 12:00 PM
Cap'n Krusty   You have to have an AAR to get the idle down, unle...   Sep 30 2005, 12:03 PM
dmenche914   Build date and year model in many states are diffe...   Sep 30 2005, 12:07 PM
brant   Jeff, any chance the timing marks are not accura...   Sep 30 2005, 12:11 PM
BMartin914   Jeff, Your car is burning quite a bit of oil. Lik...   Sep 30 2005, 12:51 PM
jsteele22   Wow, A lot to catch up with ! Yes, the car h...   Sep 30 2005, 02:11 PM
BMartin914   When you check your timing... YES - look toward t...   Sep 30 2005, 02:20 PM
lapuwali   The EGR is there to reduce NOx, which are rise as ...   Sep 30 2005, 02:22 PM
Gint   There's some really good theory being document...   Sep 30 2005, 05:23 PM
dmenche914   Good to have freinds noting oil smoke and valve no...   Sep 30 2005, 07:01 PM
dmenche914   PS if your EGR is not hooked up to the exhaust,and...   Sep 30 2005, 07:05 PM
Cap'n Krusty   The .016" adjustment is for testing puropses only....   Sep 30 2005, 07:11 PM
jsteele22     Oct 2 2005, 07:04 PM
Gint   ...   Oct 2 2005, 08:47 PM
jsteele22   For posterity, I just wanted to add a followup. S...   Oct 19 2005, 10:46 AM
BMartin914   Way to go Jeff! http://w...   Oct 19 2005, 12:20 PM
shelby/914   Sent you an email on this subject. I've got t...   Oct 19 2005, 12:58 PM
dmenche914   Be sure to set them valves back to .006 inch clear...   Oct 19 2005, 01:11 PM
brant   who is this Shelby guy? do we let just anyone on h...   Oct 19 2005, 01:27 PM
jsteele22   http://www.914world.com/bbs...   Oct 19 2005, 01:39 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic
3 User(s) are reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th June 2024 - 01:32 PM