Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Unleaded Fuel, Did the 914/6 2.0 use Leaded Fuel?
Jeffs9146
post Sep 2 2003, 06:30 PM
Post #21


Ski Bum
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,062
Joined: 10-January 03
From: Discovery Bay, Ca
Member No.: 128



As it says above, does the original 2.0 914/6 use leaded fuel or is unleaded ok? The book says 98 octain but it doesn't say anything about Leaded or Unleaded. My 74 had an Unleaded Only sticker but the 6 doesn't!

Jeff
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
ArtechnikA
post Sep 2 2003, 06:44 PM
Post #22


rich herzog
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,390
Joined: 4-April 03
From: Salted Roads, PA
Member No.: 513
Region Association: None



QUOTE(Jeffs74~914 @ Sep 2 2003, 04:30 PM)
As it says above, does the original 2.0 914/6 use leaded fuel or is unleaded ok? The book says 98 octane but it doesn't say anything about Leaded or Unleaded. My 74 had an Unleaded Only sticker but the 6 doesn't!

the original 914.6 used leaded fuel because that's all there was in 1970 unless you were in one of the rare areas where Amoco 100 Clear was available. (i wasn't).

it is required in catalytic convertor cars, and possibly it's recommended for thermal reactor cars too; i don't know if your '74 is a cat car or not. (911's were, lots of other cars were too - but some weren't. BMW tried for a long time to get by with thermal reactors and avoid the unleaded requirement - and those last few cars were dogs...)

it was an issue for American muscle cars that were trying to run valve seats directly in their cast-iron heads. aircooled cars have always run very hard valve seat inserts and are unaffected by the absense of lead - usually, they're better off without it.

BTW - that 98 number was a Research number; it's approximately equivalent to the 92-94 "AntiKnock Index" Research-Motor average posted for conventional unleaded premium.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
Jeffs9146   Unleaded Fuel   Sep 2 2003, 06:30 PM
ArtechnikA     Sep 2 2003, 07:04 PM
ArtechnikA     Sep 2 2003, 07:07 PM
Andyrew  
QUOTE
  Sep 2 2003, 07:12 PM
Jeffs9146  
QUOTE
  Sep 2 2003, 07:14 PM
mikester   Just a note, check the method used to calculate th...   Sep 2 2003, 08:13 PM
ArtechnikA   <...   Sep 2 2003, 08:47 PM
mikester   Yeah, I went back to my reading and edited my post...   Sep 2 2003, 08:52 PM
drew365  
QUOTE
  Sep 3 2003, 09:17 AM
ArtechnikA     Sep 3 2003, 10:12 AM
Dave_Darling  

Reply to this topicStart new topic
5 User(s) are reading this topic (5 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 4th July 2024 - 12:52 PM