Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> WOT: Landis Didn't Dope, Accurate Testing Procedures In Doubt?
Midtowner
post Jul 28 2006, 12:01 PM
Post #1


Ooooo!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 652
Joined: 21-December 04
From: Sunnyvale, CA
Member No.: 3,316
Region Association: None



Landis wouldn't be that stupid to dope. I don't believe what I read. Your thougths? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/huh.gif)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14059185/
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
michel richard
post Jul 28 2006, 02:01 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,291
Joined: 22-July 03
From: Longueuil, Québec
Member No.: 936



I don't buy the guilty until proven innocent complaint.
The guy gave a sample on July 17. A professional, independent, disinterested laboratory said that the sample contained evidence that Landis used illegal performance enhancing material.
The chances that the second sample (or rather the second half of the same sample) will yield different results are slim at best.
What remains are super-remote scenarios where there is another explanation. I don't know with 100% certainty whether the guy took illegal drugs or not, I am not his shadow. I do believe that it is highly likely that he did, and that we can't have a full jury trial every time something like this comes up.

Michel Richard
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
grantsfo
post Jul 28 2006, 02:13 PM
Post #3


Arrrrhhhh!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,327
Joined: 16-March 03
Member No.: 433
Region Association: None



QUOTE(michel richard @ Jul 28 2006, 01:01 PM) *

I don't buy the guilty until proven innocent complaint.
The guy gave a sample on July 17. A professional, independent, disinterested laboratory said that the sample contained evidence that Landis used illegal performance enhancing material.
The chances that the second sample (or rather the second half of the same sample) will yield different results are slim at best.
What remains are super-remote scenarios where there is another explanation. I don't know with 100% certainty whether the guy took illegal drugs or not, I am not his shadow. I do believe that it is highly likely that he did, and that we can't have a full jury trial every time something like this comes up.

Michel Richard

...and which material would that have been? Testing procedures and parameters set related to hormones in cycling have always been suspect.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th June 2024 - 12:40 AM