Stolen 914 on Ebay, Purchased from Camp 914 a year ago and then stolen. |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Stolen 914 on Ebay, Purchased from Camp 914 a year ago and then stolen. |
ConeDodger |
Jun 8 2007, 04:35 PM
Post
#1
|
Apex killer! Group: Members Posts: 23,799 Joined: 31-December 04 From: Tahoe Area Member No.: 3,380 Region Association: Northern California |
Have you guys heard about the stolen 914 on Ebay? Purchased from Camp914 a year and a half ago and then stolen from the new owner. Ebay seller has been informed and is NOT stopping the auction. Claims he bought it legally! That actually sounds familiar. Orange and nice. This guy should seriously stop this auction before this plie of stromberg gets deeper...
|
ConeDodger |
Jul 1 2007, 05:02 PM
Post
#2
|
Apex killer! Group: Members Posts: 23,799 Joined: 31-December 04 From: Tahoe Area Member No.: 3,380 Region Association: Northern California |
Ok, so if I follow your logic (which is difficult since I can hardly follow your spelling) then the following scenario should work for me given the if A then B logic model:
My neighbor owns a beautiful '59 Chev' pickup. He is in Iraq. If someone unknown to me rolls the car over on to my property and I notify DMV that I found a '59 Chev' pickup abandoned on the property that I own. I then apply for a title. DMV follows their process and checks the data base only to find the vehicle is no longer on the data base because my neighbor has not registered the vehicle in years, it is also not stolen since my neighbor is in Iraq and wouldn't know the car was gone. DMV issues the title. I own it. CHP will even say I own it. The moral problem is that I know it isn't mine, my neighbor knows it isn't mine. So even if some idiot at DMV says I own it, it doesn't make it right. The problem that people are trying to help you see is that while you may have a valid claim since you specifically didn't steal it you also aren't standing on moral high ground since you know it was stolen and that a screw up on the part of our amazing DMV which is known for such things allowed you to have a valid claim. On another site the owner (you know, the one who does have the moral high ground) has said that you came to a deal to sell it to him for what you have in it. I believe that figure was around $2000. A figure I am guessing to be bogus as well since your other moral lapses make you somewhat transparent. Have you contacted him to see why he hasn't gotten back to you? Bottom line is he offered to make you whole which he shouldn't have to do considering he owns it. To paraphrase your own words when I pointed out to you that the car was stolen, we no longer need you here to explain. Do everyone a favor. Back away from the computer, knock it off the desk, go back to communicating in grunts. You are a bit behind the evolutionary curve. |
ConeDodger |
Jul 1 2007, 10:25 PM
Post
#3
|
Apex killer! Group: Members Posts: 23,799 Joined: 31-December 04 From: Tahoe Area Member No.: 3,380 Region Association: Northern California |
Ok, so if I follow your logic (which is difficult since I can hardly follow your spelling) then the following scenario should work for me given the if A then B logic model: My neighbor owns a beautiful '59 Chev' pickup. He is in Iraq. If someone unknown to me rolls the car over on to my property and I notify DMV that I found a '59 Chev' pickup abandoned on the property that I own. I then apply for a title. DMV follows their process and checks the data base only to find the vehicle is no longer on the data base because my neighbor has not registered the vehicle in years, it is also not stolen since my neighbor is in Iraq and wouldn't know the car was gone. DMV issues the title. I own it. CHP will even say I own it. The moral problem is that I know it isn't mine, my neighbor knows it isn't mine. So even if some idiot at DMV says I own it, it doesn't make it right. The problem that people are trying to help you see is that while you may have a valid claim since you specifically didn't steal it you also aren't standing on moral high ground since you know it was stolen and that a screw up on the part of our amazing DMV which is known for such things allowed you to have a valid claim. On another site the owner (you know, the one who does have the moral high ground) has said that you came to a deal to sell it to him for what you have in it. I believe that figure was around $2000. A figure I am guessing to be bogus as well since your other moral lapses make you somewhat transparent. Have you contacted him to see why he hasn't gotten back to you? Bottom line is he offered to make you whole which he shouldn't have to do considering he owns it. To paraphrase your own words when I pointed out to you that the car was stolen, we no longer need you here to explain. Do everyone a favor. Back away from the computer, knock it off the desk, go back to communicating in grunts. You are a bit behind the evolutionary curve. Gee Smokey, Why didn't you respond to my post? Too many words? |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 07:23 PM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |