Hybrid Porsches, One 100 years old and one "new".... |
|
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG.
This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way. Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners. |
|
Hybrid Porsches, One 100 years old and one "new".... |
neo914-6 |
Nov 13 2007, 12:08 AM
Post
#1
|
neo life Group: Members Posts: 5,086 Joined: 16-January 03 From: Willow Glen (San Jose) Member No.: 159 |
Electric "hybrid" Porsche
Tesla's comparison to their new roadster, Porschius. Not sure what the aircraft above it represents... |
byndbad914 |
Nov 14 2007, 06:47 PM
Post
#2
|
shoehorn and some butter - it fits Group: Members Posts: 1,547 Joined: 23-January 06 From: Broomfield, CO Member No.: 5,463 Region Association: None |
If pollution is the issue, electric cars are NOT the answer. Look what it takes to make the electricity... CO still uses coal to generate power, I mean, c'mon. Until this country rethinks power generation and begins converting all power generation to nuclear, I wouldn't waste a dime on an electric car from a pollution standpoint.
Then, cost-wise, they are not worth it either. Let alone run time/distance between charges and how friggin' small the cars are (smaller is better in that arena). A turbo, high pressure lean-burn diesel hybrid on the other hand... now we are talking. You could make a huge F250 diesel get close to 30mpg pretty easy with a hybrid option for cruising speed. The 4x4 crew cab long bed monsters get 18-20mpg on the highway as is, so working the technology to a leaner mix, or considering a valved 2-stroke with separately compressed charge (technology that is out there in the works that burns very lean and clean), etc with a hybrid setup could really be amazing. Cars averaging 75mpg pretty easily and don't have to be little shit-boxes like the Prius (my friend has one; couldn't give it to me). I am talking the 40mpg Audis and so forth getting around 75mpg. Then invade and take over Canada (would be an easier fight than in the mid-East) and drill like crazy (Canada has a lot of untapped oil) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/ph34r.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) |
smontanaro |
Nov 14 2007, 09:13 PM
Post
#3
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,190 Joined: 3-June 05 From: Evanston, IL Member No.: 4,197 Region Association: Upper MidWest |
If pollution is the issue, electric cars are NOT the answer. Look what it takes to make the electricity... CO still uses coal to generate power, I mean, c'mon. Until this country rethinks power generation and begins converting all power generation to nuclear, I wouldn't waste a dime on an electric car from a pollution standpoint. Maybe in Colorado they use a lot of coal, but it's hardly the only source of energy to create electricity, and in some states, like California, it generates well under half the electricity, according to Tesla's website. In Illinois I think about half the electricity is generated using coal. While electricity generated from coal isn't the final answer, it's certainly a step in the right direction and you have the option of improving your electricity generation mix as time goes on. That's not likely to happen to a great degree with the internal combustion engine, in diesel or gasoline form. Skip |
racunniff |
Nov 15 2007, 12:23 PM
Post
#4
|
volt914 Group: Members Posts: 172 Joined: 21-August 06 From: Fort Collins, CO Member No.: 6,705 Region Association: Rocky Mountains |
If pollution is the issue, electric cars are NOT the answer. Look what it takes to make the electricity... CO still uses coal to generate power, I mean, c'mon. Until this country rethinks power generation and begins converting all power generation to nuclear, I wouldn't waste a dime on an electric car from a pollution standpoint. ... While electricity generated from coal isn't the final answer, it's certainly a step in the right direction and you have the option of improving your electricity generation mix as time goes on. That's not likely to happen to a great degree with the internal combustion engine, in diesel or gasoline form. Skip Yes, exactly. It is much easier to scrub one large plant of pollutants than millions of auto engines. Electro Auto (where I got my kit) has a FAQ entry on this: http://www.electroauto.com/info/poll.shtml |
swl |
Nov 15 2007, 04:30 PM
Post
#5
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1,409 Joined: 7-August 05 From: Kingston,On,Canada Member No.: 4,550 Region Association: Canada |
If pollution is the issue, electric cars are NOT the answer. Look what it takes to make the electricity... CO still uses coal to generate power, I mean, c'mon. Until this country rethinks power generation and begins converting all power generation to nuclear, I wouldn't waste a dime on an electric car from a pollution standpoint. ... While electricity generated from coal isn't the final answer, it's certainly a step in the right direction and you have the option of improving your electricity generation mix as time goes on. That's not likely to happen to a great degree with the internal combustion engine, in diesel or gasoline form. Skip Yes, exactly. It is much easier to scrub one large plant of pollutants than millions of auto engines. Electro Auto (where I got my kit) has a FAQ entry on this: http://www.electroauto.com/info/poll.shtml Did you catch the part that said "Out of the 100% total potential energy in the crude oil, only 11% is left to turn the wheels of the car"? The electical generation cycle is supposedly in the 55% efficency range - 5 times more efficient than the oil cycle. I agree that todays batteries are not the way to go for large scale relief from oil. But the electric car/hybrid is a great way of easing in electrical technology. Manufacturers can realisticly put technology into the cars without a drastic departure from their existing technology. Do their research - get experience in the field. Then when generation/storage issues have been resolved they will be ready to jump to oilless. At the risk of being banished to the sandbox... Did you see the report from the Democrats that has their estimates of the true cost of the war in the middle east? Over $1trillion! Imagine if that money had been invested in NASA style research on energy self sufficiency 10 years ago. Americans wouldn't need the middle east - or Canada! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/hide.gif) |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th June 2024 - 05:35 AM |
All rights reserved 914World.com © since 2002 |
914World.com is the fastest growing online 914 community! We have it all, classifieds, events, forums, vendors, parts, autocross, racing, technical articles, events calendar, newsletter, restoration, gallery, archives, history and more for your Porsche 914 ... |