Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> V8 guys - what starter are you using?, Stock starter just groans
Cheapsnake
post Jan 17 2010, 03:20 PM
Post #1


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 15-November 07
From: Door County, WI
Member No.: 8,341



I tried to do a bench start on my Rover V8 yesterday. I'm using the stock 914 starter with the Kennedy adapter plate and flywheel. The starter engaged well, but just barely turned the engine over. My battery was freshly charged.

I'm going to take the starter in tomorrow to have it bench tested, but in the meantime, I'm wondering if the stock starter is just not up to the job of turning a V8. I know most of the V8's going into these things are SBC's, but what are you using for a starter?

Tom
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
codices
post Jan 17 2010, 03:45 PM
Post #2


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 9-October 08
From: Morrison, Colorado
Member No.: 9,626
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



I used the high-torque starter on my last 2.0. I will use the same type for my 215 conversion. Besides I like the neat sound that they make.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Phoenix-MN
post Jan 17 2010, 04:44 PM
Post #3


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 927
Joined: 23-January 04
From: ST. Bonifacius,MN
Member No.: 1,590



I'm using one of the high-torque geared starters, it works very good. You can listen to the startup at http://phoenixhobbies.com/html/first_drive.html and click on the embeded video. My application is a V6 with about 9.5:1 compression.

Paul
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
computers4kids
post Jan 17 2010, 05:02 PM
Post #4


Love these little cars!
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,443
Joined: 11-June 05
From: Port Townsend, WA
Member No.: 4,253
Region Association: None



High torgue...."gear reduction"
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cheapsnake
post Jan 17 2010, 05:12 PM
Post #5


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 15-November 07
From: Door County, WI
Member No.: 8,341



QUOTE(codices @ Jan 17 2010, 01:45 PM) *

I used the high-torque starter on my last 2.0. I will use the same type for my 215 conversion. Besides I like the neat sound that they make.

Dave

Are you sure the hi torque starter is up to the job on the 215?

Tom
(edit) oops, never mind. I should have read the previous posts.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
codices
post Jan 17 2010, 05:17 PM
Post #6


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 9-October 08
From: Morrison, Colorado
Member No.: 9,626
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



Should be. Seems like it was (some time ago since I bought it) double the torque of stock? Check it out and see what they claim.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
messix
post Jan 17 2010, 05:29 PM
Post #7


AKA "CLUTCH KILLER"!
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 6,995
Joined: 14-April 05
From: between shit kickers and pinky lifters/ puget sound wa.north of Seattle south of Canada
Member No.: 3,931
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



wasn't there something about the potential of bolt heads on the flywheel and the clutch disc interfering?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mike Bellis
post Jan 17 2010, 07:34 PM
Post #8


Resident Electrician
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,346
Joined: 22-June 09
From: Midlothian TX
Member No.: 10,496
Region Association: None



Hi torque 911 on my 283 V8
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
marks914
post Jan 18 2010, 06:08 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 845
Joined: 9-October 04
From: the motor city
Member No.: 2,912
Region Association: None



I have been using an IMI gear reduction starter on my 302 with 11:1 compression, no problems so far for about 8 years.
Mark
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
sean_v8_914
post Jan 18 2010, 08:18 AM
Post #10


Chingon 601
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,011
Joined: 1-February 05
From: San Diego
Member No.: 3,541



I have ued 911 starter and now I have IMI geared starter. it souds so honda....untill that 350 jumps to life

Paul, your car looks great, nice job!!! love the boxter muffler (boxter?)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bruce Hinds
post Jan 18 2010, 11:25 AM
Post #11


V-8 madness
***

Group: Members
Posts: 734
Joined: 27-December 06
From: Port Orchard, WA
Member No.: 7,391
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I don't think the gear reduction starter was available when I did my conversion and at the time I didn't want to pop for the reverse rotation chevy unit sold for the Rengade conversion and I think it was done by Kennedy.
The stock 914 starter worked slow but well for many years as I was only pushing about 9:1 compression, but the problem surfaced it's ugly head one day when I had to get somewhere. As I understand what happened is that the bearing at the output shaft is not up to the task and when it wears out the teeth start skipping and that will wear the teeth on the flywheel or chip them off.
I could put the car in high gear and push it just enough to move the flywheel and try it again and usually get it started, but every time it got to the broken tooth it would just spin.
Kennedy was able to put a new ring gear on my flywheel. Wish I'd done it right the first time. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/headbang.gif)
B
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Dr. Roger
post Jan 18 2010, 01:31 PM
Post #12


A bat out of hell.
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,944
Joined: 31-January 05
From: Hercules, California
Member No.: 3,533
Region Association: Northern California



IMI hi torque here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
wallys914
post Jan 18 2010, 11:52 PM
Post #13


In life you don't get what you want, you get what you negoia
**

Group: Members
Posts: 190
Joined: 10-October 08
From: Garden Grove,
Member No.: 9,631
Region Association: Southern California



I called pelican and renegade they both use IMI 101, just to let all the others know this is the same that they sell for vw's and it is about 75$ cheaper at a bug store than any other. I also tried to use a 911 starter, but it was just to slow, but I also had some troubles with ignition...

http://www.kustom1warehouse.net/ has new original IMI 101 and they ship for cheap.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
codices
post Jan 19 2010, 12:44 AM
Post #14


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 95
Joined: 9-October 08
From: Morrison, Colorado
Member No.: 9,626
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



e-bay under 914 Porsche parts has IMI 101 remanufactured starters from "hiperformanceusa" for $119.99 with free shipping.

Dave
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cheapsnake
post Jan 19 2010, 07:52 AM
Post #15


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 419
Joined: 15-November 07
From: Door County, WI
Member No.: 8,341



QUOTE(codices @ Jan 18 2010, 10:44 PM) *

e-bay under 914 Porsche parts has IMI 101 remanufactured starters from "hiperformanceusa" for $119.99 with free shipping.

Dave

Thanks Dave, ordered that one yesterday and I should be in business by the end of the week. Woohoo!!

Tom
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th December 2024 - 08:50 AM