Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V < 1 2  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> What size rear springs for an LS1?, worried that the 100 lb-ers may be too soft.
dadaDaveed
post Jan 18 2012, 10:22 AM
Post #21


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 111
Joined: 19-February 09
From: San Antonio, TX
Member No.: 10,071
Region Association: Southwest Region



For brakes, I'm using PMB restored M calipers and a new 19mm MC on vented rotors front and back. I may go bigger ultimately, but I think I should try these first to see how well they perform.

For stiffening, I have the GT kit and the Engman long kit installed. No plans for anything else yet.


With 914 A-arms the smallest option I've come across is 21mm. So from what I'm hearing, maybe 21 front and 200 rear would be a good combo to start with. And then upgrade to an adjustable front sway bar up front. Sound like a reasonable plan?


@pdlightning: I was planning to use the Renegade setup, which moves the trans back some, I think. I'm using 944 CV's and a rebuilt 901 box with a flipped H.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Jan 18 2012, 11:06 AM
Post #22


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



Yes that sounds like a good combo, but from your first post it sounded like you were going to keep everything else stock... Which is why I suggested 140's....

However I would still say stick with stock A arms and just have the upgraded sway bar up front...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
andys
post Jan 18 2012, 11:22 AM
Post #23


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,165
Joined: 21-May 03
From: Valencia, CA
Member No.: 721
Region Association: None



QUOTE(shoguneagle @ Jan 18 2012, 07:36 AM) *


These characteristics were not the problem of the suspension I used but because the engine gave a higher center of gravity that the stock -4 or -6 engines.



IMO, this is where the fundamental handling issue lies. The high rear CG plays havoc with weight transfer when trying to get the chassis to handle on the track. Rear spring rates need to be pretty high, and a rear sway (given you have LSD) will help settle down the rear. This of course is only part of what's necessary for the track.

The OP is building a street car, so ride comfort would be the preferred goal (if it were me), along with decent stability and balance. His proposed starting point seems reasonable (in post #21). If there's a trait he doesn't like, he can make subsequent changes.

Andys
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dadaDaveed
post Jan 18 2012, 12:07 PM
Post #24


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 111
Joined: 19-February 09
From: San Antonio, TX
Member No.: 10,071
Region Association: Southwest Region



Initially, I was hoping to keep the stock front to save some $$. But, it sounds like I need to go more aggressive.

Considering the significant added horsepower, weight, and the higher CG, I'm leaning towards the heavier 21/ 200 combo and adjustable sway. I want the ride to be firm and sporty but reasonably comfortable. Of course, comfort is a relative term. For perspective... I'm 33, lean and fairly fit. And let's face it... this car is all about going fast... so if the ride is firm (but not harsh) I'll be very happy.

Thanks for the input guys! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/beerchug.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jimkelly
post Jan 18 2012, 12:18 PM
Post #25


Delaware USA
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,969
Joined: 5-August 04
From: Delaware, USA
Member No.: 2,460
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



renegade no longer sells heavy duty springs.

they offer something like this now.

http://www.ground-control-store.com/produc...ption.php/II=76

jim
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
andys
post Jan 18 2012, 12:26 PM
Post #26


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,165
Joined: 21-May 03
From: Valencia, CA
Member No.: 721
Region Association: None



Dave,

If you wish to keep expenses down and use the stock front (with 911 brakes/5 lug/sway), I don't see much issue with this. Now perhaps some may disagree, but the stock torsion bars should be adequate for the street (and give you a better ride)........there's that comfort thing again, but I am twice your age so it figures.

Andys
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jmmotorsports
post Jan 18 2012, 12:41 PM
Post #27


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 308
Joined: 15-August 06
From: Kelso,Wa.
Member No.: 6,658
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



When I first built my car with the SBC I ran 21 mm torsion bars. 22 mm sway bar and 200 lb springs. When I put the LS1 in,I changed the rear to 180,front back to stock torsion bars. Still have the 22 mm sway in front with a stock bar in back.
This setup works for me for street and the 2 or 3 autox I do a year.

Jerry
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V < 1 2
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th June 2024 - 08:46 PM