Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages V  1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How does this target AFR table look?, VE table results after autotune
rwilner
post Mar 28 2012, 08:36 AM
Post #1


No Ghosts in the Machine
***

Group: Members
Posts: 953
Joined: 30-March 10
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 11,530
Region Association: North East States



I'm going to use the autotune feature of Microsquirt to set my fuel map (VE table). This system will automatically adjust the VE to achieve the mixture as defined by the target AFR table.

This is a 12x12 table. The Y axis is MAP reading (load), and the X axis is RPM. This table was auto-generated by this microsquirt calculator.

What do you guys think? Is this a solid target AFR table or are adjustments needed?

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gothspeed
post Mar 28 2012, 08:55 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,539
Joined: 3-February 09
From: SoCal
Member No.: 10,019
Region Association: None



Are you looking for max power or max economy? For basic all around use that is just about where you want it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

If the o2 sensor is responsible for most/all of the A/F measurements ....... make sure there are absolutely zero exhaust leaks before the o2 sensor.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
aircooledtechguy
post Mar 28 2012, 09:08 AM
Post #3


The Aircooledtech Guy
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,966
Joined: 8-November 08
From: Anacortes, WA
Member No.: 9,730
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



Disclaimer: I can barely program my cell phone. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/blink.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/biggrin.gif) I had someone much younger and MS savvy help me program my MS powered car. . .

If you're going for max power, then you will need an AFR in the high 11s low 12s where you are on the gas during hard WOT acceleration. My car leans out on cruise to 14-16 around 65-75 mph in high gear. Once I blip the gas it goes back into the 12s for power.

I've got more tuning to do on mine. Now that I have a CHT gauge installed I will be better able to lean out the mixture to go after better fuel economy w/o worrying about cooking the heads.

That table will get you started, but richening will give you power.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rwilner
post Mar 28 2012, 09:08 AM
Post #4


No Ghosts in the Machine
***

Group: Members
Posts: 953
Joined: 30-March 10
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 11,530
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(gothspeed @ Mar 28 2012, 10:55 AM) *

Are you looking for max power

Yes

QUOTE

or max economy?

Yes!

QUOTE

For basic all around use that is just about where you want it. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)


This is really my goal. I might buy some dyno time at some point to squeeze a little more power out.

QUOTE

If the o2 sensor is responsible for most/all of the A/F measurements ....... make sure there are absolutely zero exhaust leaks before the o2 sensor.


Hm...I believe I have no exhaust leaks...is there a way to check besides listening? Whenever i've heard exhaust leaks they have been obvious to me. If I put my foot over my tailpipe while the car is idling, the engine loads up and I don't hear any obvious leaks.

I'll make sure to warm up the engine/exhaust before doing the tuning to get everything expanded.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Andyrew
post Mar 28 2012, 09:20 AM
Post #5


Spooling.... Please wait
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,376
Joined: 20-January 03
From: Riverbank, Ca
Member No.: 172
Region Association: Northern California



You need to be low 12's high 11's for power. Especially with air cooled. Running lean will also create more heat...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mrbubblehead
post Mar 28 2012, 09:32 AM
Post #6


Twodollardoug
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,155
Joined: 17-December 10
From: calimesa ca.
Member No.: 12,492
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Andyrew @ Mar 28 2012, 08:20 AM) *

You need to be low 12's high 11's for power. Especially with air cooled. Running lean will also create more heat...


how do you figure?
(IMG:http://www.914world.com/bbs2/uploads_offsite/i722.photobucket.com-12492-1332948731.1.jpg)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
904svo
post Mar 28 2012, 09:48 AM
Post #7


904SVO
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,123
Joined: 17-November 05
From: Woodstock,Georgia
Member No.: 5,146



Air cooled engines use the AFR to help cool the engine thats why the like to run rich.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mrbubblehead
post Mar 28 2012, 09:52 AM
Post #8


Twodollardoug
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,155
Joined: 17-December 10
From: calimesa ca.
Member No.: 12,492
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(904svo @ Mar 28 2012, 08:48 AM) *

Air cooled engines use the AFR to help cool the engine thats why the like to run rich.


looks like rich of peak is the hottest to me. how do you know this?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Mar 28 2012, 09:56 AM
Post #9


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(904svo @ Mar 28 2012, 11:48 AM) *

Air cooled engines use the AFR to help cool the engine thats why the like to run rich.

Exactly!

My head temps would go up 75+ degrees when I tried similar AFR's and pulling long hills it was totally getting into the danger zone.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
JamesM
post Mar 28 2012, 10:13 AM
Post #10


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,958
Joined: 6-April 06
From: Kearns, UT
Member No.: 5,834
Region Association: Intermountain Region



QUOTE(rwilner @ Mar 28 2012, 06:36 AM) *

I'm going to use the autotune feature of Microsquirt to set my fuel map (VE table). This system will automatically adjust the VE to achieve the mixture as defined by the target AFR table.

This is a 12x12 table. The Y axis is MAP reading (load), and the X axis is RPM. This table was auto-generated by this microsquirt calculator.

What do you guys think? Is this a solid target AFR table or are adjustments needed?

Attached Image


I have mine set closer to 12-12.5 in the WOT range. I would guess you may get some pops on overrun where you have it leaned out to 15+
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Mar 28 2012, 10:19 AM
Post #11


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



The 13.5:1 AFR is fine, running stoich or higher is when temps start getting too high. One nice thing nice about SDS is the lean/rich mixture control knob. I've seen this first hand and have played with the AFR. Head temps increases were almost immediate when you leaned out the mix.
Seat of the pants best power was 12-12.5:1 AFR
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
underthetire
post Mar 28 2012, 10:42 AM
Post #12


914 Guru
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 5,062
Joined: 7-October 08
From: Brentwood
Member No.: 9,623
Region Association: Northern California



IMO your lean all the way through, except maybe decel. I tried 14.5-1 at cruise, engine not happy. 13.5 was ok for hwy, 12 for hard accel.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gothspeed
post Mar 28 2012, 10:47 AM
Post #13


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,539
Joined: 3-February 09
From: SoCal
Member No.: 10,019
Region Association: None



good chart mrbubblehead ............ that chart shows temps at ideal ignition timing ........ (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

if one's temps vary much beyond what the chart shows ......... it means the timing is not ideal for that given A/F ratio.


A/F ratio changes affect 'flame front speed', here;

http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/resources/myths.php


Here is a simple explanation on the rich vs lean heat issue;

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/eng99/eng99611.htm


Also:

http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/resources/rich.php
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rwilner
post Mar 28 2012, 10:53 AM
Post #14


No Ghosts in the Machine
***

Group: Members
Posts: 953
Joined: 30-March 10
From: Boston, MA
Member No.: 11,530
Region Association: North East States



I'm finding this table from the megamanual quite helpful.
Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mrbubblehead
post Mar 28 2012, 11:03 AM
Post #15


Twodollardoug
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,155
Joined: 17-December 10
From: calimesa ca.
Member No.: 12,492
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(gothspeed @ Mar 28 2012, 09:47 AM) *

good chart mrbubblehead ............ that chart shows temps at ideal ignition timing ........ (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

if one's temps vary much beyond what the chart shows ......... it means the timing is not ideal for that given A/F ratio.


A/F ratio changes affect 'flame front speed', here;

http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/resources/myths.php


Here is a simple explanation on the rich vs lean heat issue;

http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/eng99/eng99611.htm


Also:

http://www.innovatemotorsports.com/resources/rich.php


(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) (IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif)

there arnt many people that realize the relationship between a/f ratio and timing.... most just set the timing and tune to it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Mar 28 2012, 11:09 AM
Post #16


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



(IMG:style_emoticons/default/agree.gif) You're probably going to want something around the 12.5-13 in a lot of those bins. Gaining fuel economy can come from keeping your foot out of it and tuning the cruize mixture a little leaner. But I would play with that after the fact. Get it running strong and cool first.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Mar 28 2012, 12:19 PM
Post #17


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(McMark @ Mar 28 2012, 01:09 PM) *

You're probably going to want something around the 12.5-13 in a lot of those bins. Gaining fuel economy can come from keeping your foot out of it and tuning the cruize mixture a little leaner. But I would play with that after the fact. Get it running strong and cool first.

This is a good plan, the deceleration values can be left alone because in reality the number is meaningless. Most likely you have to enter a value just to keep the program happy, you will find your O2 meter will lean out off the chart. This is normal on deceleration since there is no load and you cut the fuel.
You will not hurt anything (except MPG) by running a little rich. Run lean and you can fuch things up PDQ.

As to timing I have programmable crankfire and I also played with this extensively. Important yes, but it's not rocket science.

As to all the articles linked they apply to watercooled engines not so much to aircooled. As 904svo stated the aircooled engines use the fuel charge to help cool the engine. This one of the main reasons aircooled engines couldn't meet later emission standards.

I've learned by doing, BTDT.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gothspeed
post Mar 28 2012, 12:26 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,539
Joined: 3-February 09
From: SoCal
Member No.: 10,019
Region Association: None



904 engines are carbureted
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mark Henry
post Mar 28 2012, 12:35 PM
Post #19


that's what I do!
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 20,065
Joined: 27-December 02
From: Port Hope, Ontario
Member No.: 26
Region Association: Canada



QUOTE(gothspeed @ Mar 28 2012, 02:26 PM) *

904 engines are carbureted

Hoe...kay (IMG:style_emoticons/default/rolleyes.gif)

Members name "904svo" post #7.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
polo classic
post Mar 28 2012, 12:52 PM
Post #20


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 32
Joined: 7-October 11
From: Oslo
Member No.: 13,650
Region Association: Scandinavia



it is also better to start tuning from slightly rich

Lean -> hole in pistons
Rich -> bore wash

Hole in pistons happens faster than bore wash (IMG:style_emoticons/default/wink.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

4 Pages V  1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 14th September 2024 - 01:19 PM