Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Trailing Arm Re-inforcement Question
76-914
post Mar 22 2013, 11:59 AM
Post #1


Repeat Offender & Resident Subaru Antagonist
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,647
Joined: 23-January 09
From: Temecula, CA
Member No.: 9,964
Region Association: Southern California



I want to stiffen the trailing arms by adding the 1" tubes as outlined in another thread http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...p;#entry1831183 . Erc had some good info on this as did Andy (socalandy). This is my question. Should the tube wall be the same gauge as the trailing arm material? Andy stated the the tube he used is .125 wall and I thought that was overkill but I am a self admitted dumb ass and what do I know. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif) Also, should the tube be chromoloy? The only .125 I have is mid steel sch. 40 and thought I'd better ask those in the know, first. TIA, kent
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
McMark
post Mar 22 2013, 02:51 PM
Post #2


914 Freak!
***************

Group: Retired Admin
Posts: 20,179
Joined: 13-March 03
From: Grand Rapids, MI
Member No.: 419
Region Association: None



This is a guess - but I would imagine that any tube would be sufficient (within reason).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Mblizzard
post Mar 22 2013, 03:08 PM
Post #3


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,033
Joined: 28-January 13
From: Knoxville Tn
Member No.: 15,438
Region Association: South East States



Skipping any structural issues as I am sure others have more insight than I do. But it is always best to put the same types of steel together. I don't think the arm is chromoly so I think the mild steel might be the better as it will have similar expansion and contraction properties as the arm. But I don't know if the way that loads are carried through the makes a certain wall thickness a requirement but it would seem appropriate to try to match what was there and not go into overkill mode unless there is a clear benefit.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gms
post Mar 22 2013, 03:34 PM
Post #4


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,708
Joined: 12-March 04
From: Chicagoland
Member No.: 1,785
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(76-914 @ Mar 22 2013, 12:59 PM) *

I want to stiffen the trailing arms by adding the 1" tubes as outlined in another thread http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...p;#entry1831183 . Erc had some good info on this as did Andy (socalandy). This is my question. Should the tube wall be the same gauge as the trailing arm material? Andy stated the the tube he used is .125 wall and I thought that was overkill but I am a self admitted dumb ass and what do I know. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif) Also, should the tube be chromoloy? The only .125 I have is mid steel sch. 40 and thought I'd better ask those in the know, first. TIA, kent

Are you going to reinforce you suspension mounting ears?
Are you going racing or autocrossing with the car?
remember the trailing arms are designed to bend on impact and absorb energy, once they are stronger the energy will be transferred to the car body.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
76-914
post Mar 22 2013, 03:58 PM
Post #5


Repeat Offender & Resident Subaru Antagonist
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 13,647
Joined: 23-January 09
From: Temecula, CA
Member No.: 9,964
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(Mblizzard @ Mar 22 2013, 02:08 PM) *

Skipping any structural issues as I am sure others have more insight than I do. But it is always best to put the same types of steel together. I don't think the arm is chromoly so I think the mild steel might be the better as it will have similar expansion and contraction properties as the arm. But I don't know if the way that loads are carried through the makes a certain wall thickness a requirement but it would seem appropriate to try to match what was there and not go into overkill mode unless there is a clear benefit.

God point on similar metals. I would think the tube would be somewhat larger and that the shear strength of the tube would have to = the tensil strength of the metal on the trailing arms. If this is confusing I can re-explain it and confuse you again. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif)

QUOTE(gms @ Mar 22 2013, 02:34 PM) *

QUOTE(76-914 @ Mar 22 2013, 12:59 PM) *

I want to stiffen the trailing arms by adding the 1" tubes as outlined in another thread http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...p;#entry1831183 . Erc had some good info on this as did Andy (socalandy). This is my question. Should the tube wall be the same gauge as the trailing arm material? Andy stated the the tube he used is .125 wall and I thought that was overkill but I am a self admitted dumb ass and what do I know. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/lol-2.gif) Also, should the tube be chromoloy? The only .125 I have is mid steel sch. 40 and thought I'd better ask those in the know, first. TIA, kent

Are you going to reinforce you suspension mounting ears?
Are you going racing or autocrossing with the car?
remember the trailing arms are designed to bend on impact and absorb energy, once they are stronger the energy will be transferred to the car body.

No. No racing or autoX. I'm not saying the car won't develop a taste for an occasional rice rocket. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif) I've done the Engman kit going the suby 6 route. I'm keeping it narrow/4 lug/ 1 mirrored sleeper.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th December 2024 - 09:35 AM