Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> ? Long or short intakes for dual carbs
ETMracing
post Sep 23 2014, 08:58 AM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 37
Joined: 22-August 13
From: frederick md
Member No.: 16,288
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



I am currently running a 2.0/4 with a cam and dual 44idf webers on Tangerine cable linkage and short intake manifolds. My question is what are the benefits/downsides on the taller intake manifolds? I have the option to run both
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bruce Hinds
post Sep 23 2014, 02:28 PM
Post #2


V-8 madness
***

Group: Members
Posts: 734
Joined: 27-December 06
From: Port Orchard, WA
Member No.: 7,391
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



I was really hoping someone would chime in on this, I've wondered the same thing myself.

I know some of the high performance SBC heads have longer intake runners. I have noticed that some of the intakes used for higher RPM will be taller and some designed for torque will be shorter.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SirAndy
post Sep 23 2014, 02:37 PM
Post #3


Resident German
*************************

Group: Admin
Posts: 41,943
Joined: 21-January 03
From: Oakland, Kalifornia
Member No.: 179
Region Association: Northern California



QUOTE(Bruce Hinds @ Sep 23 2014, 01:28 PM) *
I have noticed that some of the intakes used for higher RPM will be taller and some designed for torque will be shorter.

You got that backwards!


Taller intakes give you a bit more low end torque, shorter intakes will give you a bit more high rpm power.
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Triaddave
post Sep 23 2014, 02:59 PM
Post #4


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 244
Joined: 31-December 03
From: olympia,wa
Member No.: 1,478



I installed the tallest manifolds that would fit (with the carbe and filter) under the deck lid
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Bruce Hinds
post Sep 23 2014, 03:08 PM
Post #5


V-8 madness
***

Group: Members
Posts: 734
Joined: 27-December 06
From: Port Orchard, WA
Member No.: 7,391
Region Association: Pacific Northwest



QUOTE

You got that backwards!



What else is new! (IMG:style_emoticons/default/dry.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
URY914
post Sep 23 2014, 06:38 PM
Post #6


I built the lightest 914 in the history of mankind.
****************************************************************************************************

Group: Members
Posts: 124,247
Joined: 3-February 03
From: Jacksonville, FL
Member No.: 222
Region Association: None



Depends on your cam and the entire combo.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
stugray
post Sep 23 2014, 08:56 PM
Post #7


Advanced Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,825
Joined: 17-September 09
From: Longmont, CO
Member No.: 10,819
Region Association: None



I know that on my other NA boxer engine there is an aftermarket part (crawford billet power blocks) that extends the intake manifold runner length over stock.

This results in an almost perfect shift of the torque curve downwards in the RPM range.
So if even remotely apples to apples:
longer runners = higher torque at lower RPM
shorter runners = higher torque at higher RPM
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th December 2024 - 12:25 PM